HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pizarro, G Articles by Ríos, E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pizarro, G Articles by Ríos, E

Department of Physiology, Rush University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612.

1. Intramembrane charge movements and changes in intracellular calcium concentration were recorded simultaneously in voltage clamped cut skeletal muscle fibres of the frog in the presence and absence of tetracaine. 2. Extracellular application of 20 microM tetracaine reduced the increase in myoplasmic [Ca2+]. The effect on the underlying calcium release flux from the sarcoplasmic reticulum was to suppress the peak of the release while sparing the steady level attained at the end of 100 ms clamp depolarizations. 3. While the peak of the release flux at corresponding voltages was reduced by 62% after the addition of tetracaine, the rate of inactivation was the same when the pulses elicited release fluxes of similar amplitude. 4. Higher concentrations of tetracaine, 0.2 mM, abolished the calcium signal in stretched fibres whereas in slack fibres this concentration left a non-inactivating calcium release flux. 5. Lowering the extracellular pH antagonized the effect of the drug both on charge movements and on calcium signals. The permanently charged analogue tetracaine methobromide lacked effects on excitation-contraction coupling. 6. These results imply that the two kinetic components of calcium release flux have very different tetracaine sensitivities. They are also consistent with an intracellular site of action of the drug at low concentration. Taken together they strongly suggest that the inactivating and non-inactivating components of calcium release correspond to different pathways: one that inactivates, is sensitive to tetracaine and is controlled by calcium, and another that does not inactivate, is much less sensitive to tetracaine and is directly controlled by voltage.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Rios, J. Zhou, G. Brum, B. S. Launikonis, and M. D. Stern Calcium-dependent Inactivation Terminates Calcium Release in Skeletal Muscle of Amphibians J. Gen. Physiol., March 31, 2008; 131(4): 335 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Brum, N. Piriz, R. DeArmas, E. Rios, M. Stern, and G. Pizarro Differential Effects of Voltage-Dependent Inactivation and Local Anesthetics on Kinetic Phases of Ca2+ Release in Frog Skeletal Muscle Biophys. J., July 1, 2003; 85(1): 245 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. McCarron, J. W. Craig, K. N. Bradley, and T. C. Muir Agonist-induced phasic and tonic responses in smooth muscle are mediated by InsP3 J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2002; 115(10): 2207 - 2218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Yano, R. El-Hayek, and N. Ikemoto Role of Calcium Feedback in Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Isolated Triads J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 1995; 270(34): 19936 - 19942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]