J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 464 pp 361-378
Copyright © 1993 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flament, D
Right arrow Articles by Lemon, R N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flament, D
Right arrow Articles by Lemon, R N

Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man.

D Flament, P Goldsmith, C J Buckley and R N Lemon

Department of Anatomy, Cambridge University.

1. The response of the first dorsal interosseous (1DI) muscle to non-invasive magnetic and scalp electrical stimulation of the brain have been investigated during performance of different manual tasks. 2. The six tasks tested required activation of the 1DI muscle, either in isolation (during abduction of the index finger) or as part of a more complex pattern of muscle synergies (e.g. during power grip). The level of 1DI EMG activity across tasks was kept constant by providing subjects with visual feedback of their muscle activity. 3. In every subject (n = 14) magnetic stimulation produced larger responses during performance of complex tasks than during the simple index abduction task. The pooled results from all subjects showed that four of the five complex tasks were associated with significantly larger 1DI responses (paired t test, P < 0.05). 4. These results were confirmed at the single motor unit level for nine motor units recorded from six subjects. Subjects were requested to produce a steady discharge of the same motor unit during performance of different tasks. The probability of motor unit discharge in response to magnetic stimulation was significantly greater during complex tasks (rotation or pincer grips) than during abduction. 5. Scalp electrical stimulation was performed in three subjects with the cathode at the vertex and the anode over the contralateral motor cortex. The pattern of response amplitudes in the different tasks tended to parallel that obtained for magnetic stimulation, but the task-related differences were smaller. 6. These results suggest that during performance of the different tasks, the corticospinal volleys evoked by magnetic stimulation may vary in amplitude. The task-related cortical mechanisms that may contribute to this variability are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Davare, R. Lemon, and E. Olivier
Selective modulation of interactions between ventral premotor cortex and primary motor cortex during precision grasping in humans
J. Physiol., June 1, 2008; 586(11): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. A. Perez and L. G. Cohen
Mechanisms Underlying Functional Changes in the Primary Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to an Active Hand
J. Neurosci., May 28, 2008; 28(22): 5631 - 5640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. V. Sale and J. G. Semmler
Age-related differences in corticospinal control during functional isometric contractions in left and right hands
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1483 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Schneider, B. A. Lavoie, H. Barbeau, and C. Capaday
Timing of cortical excitability changes during the reaction time of movements superimposed on tonic motor activity
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2004; 97(6): 2220 - 2227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. Woldag, S. Lukhaup, C. Renner, and H. Hummelsheim
Enhanced Motor Cortex Excitability During Ipsilateral Voluntary Hand Activation in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2556 - 2559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
U. Ziemann, T. V. Ilic, H. Alle, and F. Meintzschel
Cortico-motoneuronal excitation of three hand muscles determined by a novel penta-stimulation technique
Brain, August 1, 2004; 127(8): 1887 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. M. Stinear and W. D. Byblow
Impaired Modulation of Intracortical Inhibition in Focal Hand Dystonia
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2004; 14(5): 555 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. M. Stinear and W. D. Byblow
Role of Intracortical Inhibition in Selective Hand Muscle Activation
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 2014 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
K. M. Rosler
Transcranial Magnetic Brain Stimulation: a Tool to Investigate Central Motor Pathways
Physiology, December 1, 2001; 16(6): 297 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Capaday, B. A. Lavoie, H. Barbeau, C. Schneider, and M. Bonnard
Studies on the Corticospinal Control of Human Walking. I. Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. G. Semmler and M. A. Nordstrom
Hemispheric Differences in Motor Cortex Excitability During a Simple Index Finger Abduction Task in Humans
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1998; 79(3): 1246 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 The Physiological Society.