J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 482, Issue Pt 3 pp 623-640
Copyright © 1995 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quevedo, J
Right arrow Articles by Rudomin, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quevedo, J
Right arrow Articles by Rudomin, P

Raphe magnus and reticulospinal actions on primary afferent depolarization of group I muscle afferents in the cat.

J Quevedo, J R Eguibar, I Jiménez and P Rudomin

Department of Physiology, Biophysics and Neurosciences, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Evanzados del IPN, México DF, México.

1. In the anaesthetized cat, electrical stimulation of the bulbar reticular formation produced a short latency (2.1 +/- 0.3 ms) positive potential in the cord dorsum. In contrast, stimulation of the nucleus raphe magnus with strengths below 50 microA evoked a slow negative potential with a mean latency of 5.5 +/- 0.6 ms that persisted after sectioning the contralateral pyramid and was abolished by sectioning the ipsilateral dorsolateral funiculus. 2. The field potentials evoked by stimulation of the bulbar reticular formation and of the nucleus raphe magnus had a different intraspinal distribution, suggesting activation of different sets of segmental interneurones. 3. Stimulation of these two supraspinal nuclei produced primary afferent depolarization (PAD) in single Ib fibres and inhibited the PAD elicited by group I volleys in single Ia fibres. The inhibition of the PAD of Ia fibres produced by reticulospinal and raphespinal inputs appears to be exerted on different interneurones along the PAD pathway. 4. It is concluded that, although reticulospinal and raphespinal pathways have similar inhibitory effects on PAD of Ia fibres, and similar excitatory effects on the PAD of Ib fibres, their actions are conveyed by partly independent pathways. This would allow their separate involvement in the control of posture and movement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Bosco, A. Rankin, and R. E. Poppele
Modulation of Dorsal Spinocerebellar Responses to Limb Movement. I. Effect of Serotonin
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3361 - 3371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. D. Wall and M. Lidierth
Five Sources of a Dorsal Root Potential: Their Interactions and Origins in the Superficial Dorsal Horn
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 860 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 The Physiological Society.