J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Physiol Vol 483, Issue Pt 3 pp 747-758
Copyright © 1995 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Treede, R D
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, J N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Treede, R D
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, J N

Evidence for two different heat transduction mechanisms in nociceptive primary afferents innervating monkey skin.

 R D Treede, R A Meyer, S N Raja and J N Campbell

Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

1. Mechano- and heat-sensitive A fibre nociceptors (AMHs) and C fibre nociceptors (CMHs) in hairy skin (forty-six AMHs and twenty-one CMHs) and in glabrous skin (fifty-nine AMHs and ten CMHs) of anaesthetized monkeys were tested with a 30 s, 53 degrees C heat stimulus, delivered by a laser thermal stimulator (0.1 s rise time, 7.5 mm diameter). 2. Two types of heat response were observed in hairy skin AMHs. Type I AMHs had a peak discharge towards the end of the stimulus, response latencies to heat of up to several seconds, a median heat threshold greater than 53 degrees C, and a mean conduction velocity of 25 m s-1 (n = 33). Type II AMHs had a peak discharge within 1-3 s, a mean response latency of 120 ms, a median heat threshold of 46 degrees C, and a mean conduction velocity of 15 m s-1 (n = 13). Type I AMH fibres were sensitized to heat, whereas heat responses of type II AMHs were suppressed following the intense heat stimulus. 3. In glabrous skin, only type I AMHs were found. The absence of type II AMHs is consistent with the absence of first pain to heat in glabrous skin. 4. C fibre nociceptors in hairy skin had a peak discharge near stimulus onset, a mean response latency of 100 ms and a median heat threshold of 41 degrees C. Heat responses of CMHs in glabrous skin were not significantly different from those in hairy skin. 5. Only type II AMHs had response latencies that were short enough to explain first pain to heat. Heat thresholds of type II AMHs were significantly higher than those of CMHs. 6. These results suggest two different heat transduction mechanisms in nociceptive afferents. For one, heat energy is quickly transduced into action potentials, and the peak discharge is reached soon after stimulus onset. For the other, the transduction of heat is distinctly slower, and the peak discharge occurs near the end of the stimulus. Chemically mediated sensitization may be involved in the second transduction mechanism.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. D. Iannetti, N. P. Hughes, M. C. Lee, and A. Mouraux
Determinants of Laser-Evoked EEG Responses: Pain Perception or Stimulus Saliency?
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 815 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. K. Rau, N. Jiang, R. D. Johnson, and B. Y. Cooper
Heat Sensitization in Skin and Muscle Nociceptors Expressing Distinct Combinations of TRPV1 and TRPV2 Protein
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2651 - 2662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 The Physiological Society.