HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Holthusen, H Articles by Arndt, J O Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holthusen, H Articles by Arndt, J O

Department of Experimental Anaesthesiology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany.

1. Nitric oxide (NO) evokes pain on intracutaneous application, apparently by exciting cutaneous nociceptors. To look for similarities in the responsiveness and sensitivity of other nociceptive systems to NO we determined pain intensity-concentration relations for NO applied to paravascular tissue and veins in humans. 2. NO solutions (0.4-2.0 mM) were either injected paravascularly or perfused through a vascularly isolated hand vein segment. The subjects rated pain continuously with the help of an electronically controlled visual analog scale, which made it possible to determine both the time course (latency, duration) and the intensity of NO-evoked pain. 3. Regardless of where it was applied, at concentrations above 0.7 mM NO always evoked pain of similar time course and concentration dependence. Pain increased proportionally to the concentration of applied NO, reaching subjects' tolerance maximum at four to five times the threshold concentration. 4. Pain intensity-NO concentration relations were congruent, indicating that the respective nociceptive systems are equally sensitive to NO. 5. Our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that NO is a chemical link in peripheral nociception.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Levy and A. M. Strassman Modulation of Dural Nociceptor Mechanosensitivity by the Nitric Oxide-Cyclic GMP Signaling Cascade J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 766 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]