J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 489, Issue Pt 3 pp 885-894
Copyright © 1995 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nordin, M
Right arrow Articles by Fagius, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nordin, M
Right arrow Articles by Fagius, J

Effect of noxious stimulation on sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow to human muscles.

M Nordin and J Fagius

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

1. In fifteen healthy volunteers, muscle nerve sympathetic activity (MSA) was recorded from the peroneal nerve using microneurography. Blood pressure and electrocardiogram were also recorded. 2. Painful stimuli, adjusted to the subject's tolerance level, were delivered over 30-60 s via (a) pressure to the nail-bed of different digits, and to the trigeminal region, (b) electrical stimulation (5 Hz) of digital nerves and of the supraorbital nerve, or (c) instillation of soap solution into one eye. Non-painful ocular pressure was also applied. 3. All procedures except electrical stimulation of digital nerves caused a marked increase in MSA (mean, 160-248%) with preserved pulse synchrony and a rise in blood pressure. Stimulation of digits induced tachycardia, whereas stimulation of the trigeminal region tended to cause bradycardia. 4. Despite similar pain ratings, electrical stimulation of digital nerves caused a smaller MSA response than the other stimuli (mean increase, 40%). 5. It is concluded that sustained noxious stimulation in awake humans evokes a generalized MSA increase; the activity is still under baroreflex control, but the inhibitory level is reset. Both spinal and brainstem reflexes may contribute; a defence reaction is an unlikely explanation. It is suggested that the number of afferent C fibres activated by electrical stimulation of digital nerves was insufficient to induce any marked MSA response. 6. The non-painful oculo-cardiac reflex is associated with a strong increase in MSA.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
B. P.M. Imholz, W. Wieling, G. A. van Montfrans, and K. H. Wesseling
Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring:: assessment of the technology
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 1998; 38(3): 605 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 The Physiological Society.