J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 492, Issue Pt 1 pp 155-162
Copyright © 1996 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van der Kloot, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van der Kloot, W

Spontaneous and uniquantal-evoked endplate currents in normal frogs are indistinguishable.

W Van der Kloot

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794-8661, USA.

1. A recent paper concludes that the shapes of spontaneous and uniquantal-evoked signals are different. The signals were recorded with extracellular electrodes, often in the presence of neostigmine. Differences were reported between the voltage-time integrals, and between the decay times of spontaneous and evoked signals. 2. These results disagree with earlier studies using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique. 3. We recorded miniature-endplate currents (MEPCs) and uniquantal-endplate currents (u-EPCs) in a low-Mg(2+)-Ca2+ solution, sometimes with neostigmine present. Evoked quantal outputs were estimated by the method of failures, so we could reject the appropriate number of the largest evoked releases. The twenty-nine experiments showed that there were no consistent differences between the current-time integrals or half-decay times (t1/2), regardless of whether or not neostigmine was present. 4. When recording simultaneously with intracellular and extracellular electrodes, on average about 25% of the miniatures were seen in both recordings. On average, 63% of the endplate potentials were also seen in both recordings. Extracellular recording may not give the precise localization generally assumed. 5. We again conclude that quanta released by nerve stimulation and spontaneously are indistinguishable at normal frog neuromuscular junctions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Atasoy, M. Ertunc, K. L. Moulder, J. Blackwell, C. Chung, J. Su, and E. T. Kavalali
Spontaneous and Evoked Glutamate Release Activates Two Populations of NMDA Receptors with Limited Overlap
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 28(40): 10151 - 10166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Glitsch
Selective Inhibition of Spontaneous But Not Ca2+-Dependent Release Machinery by Presynaptic Group II mGluRs in Rat Cerebellar Slices
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 86 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 The Physiological Society.