J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 492, Issue Pt 1 pp 307-314
Copyright © 1996 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berendschot, T T
Right arrow Articles by van Norren, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berendschot, T T
Right arrow Articles by van Norren, D

Foveal cone mosaic and visual pigment density in dichromats.

T T Berendschot, J van de Kraats and D van Norren

Department of Ophthalmology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

1. Optical reflectance spectra of the fovea were measured in ten subjects with normal colour vision, ten protanopes and seven deuteranopes. Four conditions were used: perpendicular and oblique angle of incident and reflected light on the retina, both in a dark-adapted and a fully bleached state. 2. The spectra were analysed to assess the effects of dichromacy on the cone mosaic. A replacement model, i.e. one where the total number of cones remains unchanged and all cones are filled with a single type of pigment, was found to fit our data best. 3. The analysis of the spectral fundus reflectance also provided estimates for densities of photo-labile and photo-stable retinal pigments and fraction of long wavelength-sensitive (LWS) cones. Visual pigment density was 0.39 for protanopes and 0.42 for deuteranopes, significantly lower than the 0.57 found for colour normals. Macular pigment density was 0.54 for colour normals, 0.46 for protanopes and 0.42 for deuteranopes. 4. For colour normals the LWS cone fraction was 0.56, in agreement with psychophysical literature. The LWS cone fraction for protanopes was -0.04, and for deuteranopes 0.96, consistent with their Rayleigh matches.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 The Physiological Society.