J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 503, Issue Pt 3 pp 673-689
Copyright © 1997 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, C W
Right arrow Articles by Kirkwood, P A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, C W
Right arrow Articles by Kirkwood, P A

Evidence from motoneurone synchronization for disynaptic pathways in the control of inspiratory motoneurones in the cat.

C W Vaughan and P A Kirkwood

Sobell Department of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

1. Motoneurone synchronization was measured by cross-correlation between paired inspiratory discharges in external and internal intercostal nerves or their intramuscular branches (T3 to T8) or in the phrenic nerve (C5 root or both C5 and C6 roots independently) in anaesthetized, paralysed cats. 2. All cross-correlation histograms showed central peaks, for which the durations at half-amplitude (half-widths) from internal nerve pairs in adjacent segments were all less than for external nerve pairs in adjacent segments or within a segment (means, 1.6 ms vs. 3.4 ms for adjacent segments). Values for external-internal pairs covered the ranges for both these two. Lowest values came from two phrenic pairs (1.2 and 1.4 ms). 3. The peaks from ipsisegmental external-internal pairs were usually asymmetric and the maximum of the peak was often displaced to a lag of about -1 ms (external nerve providing the reference spikes), whereas peaks from external-external pairs were always symmetrical and centred on zero. Phrenic-internal peaks gave maxima with lags about 1 ms less than for phrenic-external peaks from the same segments. 4. Two explanations were considered possible for the differences in duration and timing: an extra synapse on the pathway to the external nerve motoneurones, or a correlation kernel for a monosynaptic connection to the external nerve motoneurones that had a slower time course than that for the internal or phrenic nerve motoneurones. Computer simulations, assuming the extra synapse, gave a good fit to the observed time courses of the correlation peaks for all categories of nerve pairs using single values of parameters (e.g. EPSP rise time) consistent with those in the literature. This could not be achieved with the different correlation kernel model. The timing of high-frequency oscillation (HFO), which was sometimes present in the correlations, was also better predicted with the extra synapse model. 5. It is concluded that most of the synchronization between external nerve motoneurones is derived from disynaptic common inputs and that any motoneurone synchronization peak with a half-width greater than about 2.2 ms should be assumed to be likely to contain di- or oligosynaptically derived components.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Takei and K. Seki
Spinomuscular Coherence in Monkeys Performing a Precision Grip Task
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 2012 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 The Physiological Society.