J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Physiol Volume 513, Number 2, 611-619, December 1, 1998
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cauquil, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cauquil, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. L.
The Journal of Physiology (1998), 513.2, pp. 611-619
© Copyright 1998 The Physiological Society

Galvanic vestibular stimulation modulates voluntary movement of the human upper body

Alexandra Séverac Cauquil and Brian L. Day

MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK


We have investigated whether vestibular information plays a role in the control of voluntary movement of the upper body. Movement consisted of a lateral tilt of the upper body in the frontal plane through an angle of about 8 deg. The influence of vestibular input was assessed from the effect of long duration (3-6 s), low-intensity (0·7 mA) galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) applied at different times relative to the movement.


GVS always produced a tilt of the body in the frontal plane but the response was larger and more prolonged when the onset of stimulation coincided with the cue to start moving compared with when it was applied some seconds after movement onset (i.e. while the subject was stationary in a tilted posture).


When the stimulus began 2 s before the voluntary movement the response consisted of two distinct components separated in time, one that was linked to the onset of GVS and another that was linked to onset of the voluntary movement. The large response observed when GVS onset coincided with the movement cue resembled the sum (after realignment in time) of these two separate components.


We suggest that these two components of the response to GVS relate to two different uses of vestibular information for whole-body control: first, to help maintain balance of the body, and second, to help guide and improve the accuracy of voluntary movements involving motion of the head in space.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
C. J. Dakin, G. M. L. Son, J. T. Inglis, and J.-S. Blouin
Frequency response of human vestibular reflexes characterized by stochastic stimuli
J. Physiol., September 15, 2007; 583(3): 1117 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J F Marsden, D E Playford, and B L Day
The vestibular control of balance after stroke
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2005; 76(5): 670 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. R. Bent, J. T. Inglis, and B. J. McFadyen
When is Vestibular Information Important During Walking?
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1269 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
B. L. Day and J. Cole
Vestibular-evoked postural responses in the absence of somatosensory information
Brain, September 1, 2002; 125(9): 2081 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 The Physiological Society.