J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 513, Number 3, 629-, December 15, 1998
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Searl, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Silinsky, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Searl, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Silinsky, E. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Perspectives
The Journal of Physiology (1998), 513.3 pp. 629
© Copyright 1998 The Physiological Society

Cross-talk between apparently independent receptors

Timothy J. Searl and Eugene M. Silinsky

Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Northwestern University Medical School, 303 E Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

Nicotinic receptors and P2X ATP receptors both incorporate transmembrane cation channels as part of the receptor moiety. However, the nicotinic and P2X ATP receptors are regarded as entirely independent molecular entities and the receptor subunits have distinctly different transmembrane topologies. Given this difference, it is of interest that recent papers (Searl et al. 1998; and two papers appearing in this issue of The Journal of Physiology: Zhou & Galligan, 1998; Barajas-Lopez et al. 1998) have confirmed earlier findings (Nakazawa et al. 1991; Silinsky & Gerzanich, 1993) that co-application of nicotinic agonists and P2X ATP receptor agonists produce less than the additive responses predicted by independent receptor activation. These papers, when taken together, suggest that such interdependent, mutually occlusive interactions are: (i) receptor mediated (as antagonists reveal full responses of the unaffected agonist); (ii) not mediated by soluble second messengers (as non-additivity is also seen in excised patches); and (iii) not due to pH changes produced by high concentrations of agonist (Wildman et al. 1997).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. S. Khakh, J. A. Fisher, R. Nashmi, D. N. Bowser, and H. A. Lester
An Angstrom Scale Interaction between Plasma Membrane ATP-Gated P2X2 and {alpha}4{beta}2 Nicotinic Channels Measured with Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer and Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy
J. Neurosci., July 20, 2005; 25(29): 6911 - 6920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
R. A. North
Molecular Physiology of P2X Receptors
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2002; 82(4): 1013 - 1067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 The Physiological Society.