J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 519, Number 1, 47-56, August 15, 1999
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cottrell, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cottrell, G. A.
The Journal of Physiology (1999), 519.1, pp. 47-56
© Copyright 1999 The Physiological Society

Block of the Helix FMRFamide-gated Na+ channel by FMRFamide and its analogues

Kevin A. Green and Glen A. Cottrell

School of Biological and Medical Sciences, Bute Medical Building, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK


In Helix neurones high doses of Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-NH2 (FMRFamide) often evoke biphasic inward whole-cell currents with brief application, and suppression of the current with prolonged application. With outside-out patches, a transient early suppression of the unitary current amplitude was seen following application of high doses of FMRFamide.


Continuous application of a concentration of FMRFamide from 30 µM to 1 mM resulted in a reduction in the amplitude of the unitary currents and an increase in open state noise. There was also an increase in the occurrence of smaller, 'subconductance' currents with the higher concentrations of FMRFamide. Similar effects were seen with FMRFamide on FaNaC expressed in oocytes. The FMRFamide analogues FLRFamide and WnLRFamide were more effective in evoking the lower conductance state. These effects of agonist at high concentrations were voltage dependent suggesting channel block.


A similar effect was seen when one of the related peptides FKRFamide, FM(D)RFamide, nLRFamide or N-AcFnLRFamide was co-applied with a low FMRFamide concentration. However, the non-amidated peptides FKRF, FLRF and nLRF and also WMDFamide did not have this effect.


The inhibition of unitary currents induced by amiloride was qualitatively different from that produced by FMRFamide analogues with no obvious occurrence of subconductance levels. FMRFamide-gated channels were also blocked by guanidinium, but only at very high concentrations.


The results strongly suggest a partial inhibition of current flow through the FMRFamide- gated channel by some part of the agonist or the related antagonist peptide molecules.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. Kellenberger and L. Schild
Epithelial Sodium Channel/Degenerin Family of Ion Channels: A Variety of Functions for a Shared Structure
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2002; 82(3): 735 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 The Physiological Society.