J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 522, Number 1, 137-145, January 1, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aimonetti, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Pagni, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aimonetti, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Pagni, S.
The Journal of Physiology (2000), 522.1, pp. 137-145
© Copyright 2000 The Physiological Society

Mechanical cutaneous stimulation alters Ia presynaptic inhibition in human wrist extensor muscles: a single motor unit study

Jean-Marc Aimonetti, Jean-Pierre Vedel, Annie Schmied and Simone Pagni

Laboratoire de Physiologie et Physiopathologie Neuromusculaire Humaine, CNRS-UPR Neurobiologie et Mouvements, 31 chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402 Marseille CEDEX 20, France

  1. Reflex responses were evoked by radial nerve stimulation in 25 single motor units in the extensor carpi radialis muscles of seven subjects during voluntary isometric wrist extension. The responses consisted of narrow peaks in the post-stimulus time histograms with latencies compatible with monosynaptic activation.

  2. When the skin of the palm and finger tips was continuously swept using a soft rotating brush, the purely monosynaptic components of the motor unit responses, as assessed from the contents of the first two 0·25 ms bins of the peak, were found to increase. This increase did not affect the motoneurone net excitatory drive, as assessed by measuring the mean duration of the inter-spike intervals. The cutaneous inputs activated by the brush may have reduced the tonic presynaptic inhibition exerted on the Ia afferents homonymous to the extensor motor units tested.

  3. To further investigate whether Ia presynaptic inhibition was involved, the responses of the extensor motor units were conditioned by stimulating the median nerve 20 ms earlier, using a protocol which is known to induce Ia extensor presynaptic inhibition originating from flexor Ia afferents. The median nerve stimulation did not affect the motoneurone excitatory drive, but led to a decrease in the responses of the extensor motor units to the radial nerve stimulation, especially in the purely monosynaptic components. This decrease was consistent with the Ia presynaptic inhibition known to occur under these stimulation conditions.

  4. The cutaneous inputs activated by the brush were found to reduce the Ia presynaptic inhibition generated by the median nerve stimulation, without affecting the distribution of the Ia presynaptic inhibition among the various types of motor units tested.

  5. The present data suggest that cutaneous inputs from the palm and finger tips may relieve the Ia presynaptic inhibition exerted on the wrist extensor motor nuclei, and thus enhance the proprioceptive assistance to fit the specific requirements of the ongoing motor task.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Menard, H. Leblond, and J.-P. Gossard
Sensory Integration in Presynaptic Inhibitory Pathways During Fictive Locomotion in the Cat
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. C. Gandevia
Spinal and Supraspinal Factors in Human Muscle Fatigue
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1725 - 1789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 The Physiological Society.