J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 526, Number 1, 195-202, July 1, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrell, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrell, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, L.
The Journal of Physiology (2000), 526.1, pp. 195-202
© Copyright 2000 The Physiological Society

The respiratory response to inspiratory resistive loading during rapid eye movement sleep in humans

Mary J. Morrell*, Helen A. K. Browne and Lewis Adams

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstans Road, London W6 8RP and *Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK

  1. We investigated the respiratory response to an added inspiratory resistive load (IRL) during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in humans and compared this with those in non-REM (NREM) sleep and wakefulness.

  2. Results were obtained from 7 out of 15 healthy subjects (n = 7; 32 ± 9 years, mean ± s.d.). Linearised IRLs (4 and 12 cmH2O l-1 s-1) were applied for five breaths during NREM sleep (4-10 trials per subject; total 101), REM sleep (2-5 trials; total 46) and wakefulness (2-3 trials; total 40). Respiratory variables were compared, between unloaded breathing (UL: mean of 5 breaths preceding IRL) and the 1st (B1) and 5th (B5) loaded breaths in each state.

  3. During wakefulness, 12 cmH2O l-1 s-1 IRL produced an immediate respiratory compensation with prolongation of inspiratory time (TI; UL: 2·0 ± 0·6; B1: 2·6 ± 0·7 s) and an increase in tidal volume (VT; UL: 0·49 ± 0·12; B1: 0·52 ± 0·12 l). During REM sleep, TI was prolonged (UL: 2·0 ± 0·3; B1: 2·2 ± 0·5 s), although VT fell (UL: 0·27 ± 0·15; B1: 0·22 ± 0·10 l). For both wakefulness and REM sleep the TI response was significantly greater than seen in NREM sleep (UL: 1·9 ± 0·3; B1: 1·9 ± 0·3 s.). For VT, only the wakefulness response was significantly different from NREM sleep (UL: 0·31 ± 0·14; B1: 0·21 ± 0·10 l). The B5 responses were not significantly different between states for any of the variables.

  4. REM sleep is associated with partial respiratory load compensation suggesting that exacerbation of sleep disordered breathing in REM (compared to NREM) sleep is unlikely to be secondary to an inability to overcome increases in upper airway resistance.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. F. Bailey, K. W. Fridel, and A. D. Rice
Sleep/Wake Firing Patterns of Human Genioglossus Motor Units
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3284 - 3291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
G. Isaev, K. Murphy, A. Guz, and L. Adams
Areas of the brain concerned with ventilatory load compensation in awake man
J. Physiol., March 15, 2002; 539(3): 935 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 The Physiological Society.