J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 529, Number 3, 579-597, December 15, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lester, R. A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lester, R. A. J.
The Journal of Physiology (2000), 529.3, pp. 579-597
© Copyright 2000 The Physiological Society

Regulation of the sensitivity of acetylcholine receptors to nicotine in rat habenula neurons

John H. Hicks, John A. Dani* and Robin A. J. Lester

Department of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294 and *Division of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA

  1. Time-dependent changes in nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) function were studied in acutely isolated medial habenula neurons during whole-cell perfusion.

  2. The peak amplitude of inward currents induced by 1 s pulses of nicotinic agonists, applied at 30 s intervals, gradually increased over the first several minutes of whole-cell recording. The ratio of response amplitudes at 1 and 15 min (t15/t1) was 1·9. Run-up of responses occurred independently of channel activation and was specific to nAChRs.

  3. The channel blocker chlorisondamine (30 µM), co-applied with nicotine, was used to irreversibly block the majority (91 %) of the nAChRs that opened in the first 2 min of recording. Run-up in the remaining 9 % unblocked channels assessed at 15 min (t15/t2 = 3·4) was similar to that in control cells not exposed to nicotine and chlorisondamine simultaneously, implying that run-up is not due to the incorporation of new receptors.

  4. A marked alteration in the sensitivity of nAChRs to extracellular Ca2+ was also observed during whole-cell perfusion. The ratio of current amplitudes obtained in 0·2 and 4·0 mM Ca2+ changed from 0·54 (t = 5 min) to 0·82 (t = 30 min).

  5. Inward rectification of nicotine-induced responses was reduced during internal dialysis. Voltages for half-maximal conductance were -23·0 and -13·8 mV at 2 and 15 min, respectively. Inclusion of either free Mg2+ (~2 mM) or spermine (100 µM) in the internal solution counteracted the change in rectification, but did not prevent run-up.

  6. The period of run-up was followed by a use-dependent run-down phase. Little run-down in peak current amplitude was induced provided that agonist was applied infrequently (5 min intervals), whereas applications at 30 s intervals produced a loss of channel function after ~15 min whole-cell perfusion. The time at which run-down began (~5-30 min) was correlated with the initial rate of nAChR desensitization (~200-4000 ms); slowly desensitizing nicotinic currents demonstrated delayed run-down.

  7. We suggest that run-up of nAChR-mediated responses does not require receptor activation and may result from a change in channel open probability. We also hypothesize that channel run-down reflects accumulation of nAChRs in long-lived desensitized/inactivated states.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 The Physiological Society.