J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 530, Number 3, 507-519, February 1, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Narusawa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Narusawa, M.
Journal of Physiology (2001), 530.3, pp. 507-519
© Copyright 2001 The Physiological Society

Effects of joint immobilization on firing rate modulation of human motor units


Kazuhiko Seki, Yuko Taniguchi and Mitsuo Narusawa


Department of Exercise Physiology, International Budo University, 841 Shinkan, Katsuura, Chiba 299-52, Japan

  1. We investigated the effects of 6 weeks of immobilization on firing rate modulation in motor units in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) of human volunteers. The middle finger, index finger and thumb were immobilized for a period of 6 weeks in a fibre-glass cast, which kept FDI in a shortened position.

  2. During isometric contraction at 20, 40, 60 and 80 % of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) (index finger abduction), motor unit action potentials were recorded from the FDI using a tungsten microelectrode, and the relationship between voluntary force and mean firing rate (MFR) was obtained by plotting the MFR of each motor unit action potential train as a function of voluntary force. Four recording sessions were held for each subject: before immobilization, after 3 and 6 weeks of immobilization, and after a 6 week recovery period.

  3. As a result of immobilization, FDI volume (as measured by computerized tomography (CT) scanning) decreased, with an accompanying reduction in aggregate EMG activity per day (P < 0.01). The force measured during MVC also decreased (P < 0.05).

  4. The slope of the relationship between voluntary force and MFR was significantly decreased after immobilization, as was the range of firing rate modulation (P < 0.01). Maximal MFR, estimated from the relationship between voluntary force and MFR, was decreased (P < 0.05).

  5. MFR was also plotted against voluntary force without being normalized with respect to MVC, and the slope of the regression line was decreased (P < 0.05). Voluntary force when the MFR was 15 Hz was estimated from regression equations for the absolute force-MFR relationship, and it was increased after immobilization (P < 0.05).

  6. These results suggest that firing rate modulation shows two different adaptations to joint immobilization: a restriction of motoneurone firing to the lower rates and an enhancement of the voluntary force exerted when the MFR is relatively low.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Lundbye-Jensen and J. B. Nielsen
Immobilization induces changes in presynaptic control of group Ia afferents in healthy humans
J. Physiol., September 1, 2008; 586(17): 4121 - 4135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. C. Clark, T. M. Manini, S. J. Bolanowski, and L. L. Ploutz-Snyder
Adaptations in human neuromuscular function following prolonged unweighting: II. Neurological properties and motor imagery efficacy
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 264 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 The Physiological Society.