J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 533, Number 3, 903-919, June 15, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicolas, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pierrot-Deseilligny, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicolas, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pierrot-Deseilligny, E.
Journal of Physiology (2001), 533.3, pp. 903-919
© Copyright 2001 The Physiological Society

Corticospinal excitation of presumed cervical propriospinal neurones and its reversal to inhibition in humans


Guillaume Nicolas, Véronique Marchand-Pauvert, David Burke and Emmanuel Pierrot-Deseilligny


Rééducation, Neurophysiologie Clinique, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France

  1. This study addresses whether in human subjects indirect corticospinal excitation of upper limb motoneurones (MNs) relayed through presumed cervical propriospinal neurones (PNs) is paralleled by corticospinal activation of inhibitory projections to these premotoneurones.
  2. The responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), whether assessed as the compound motor-evoked potential (MEP) or the peak of corticospinal excitation elicited in the post-stimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of single motor units, were conditioned by weak volleys to musculo-cutaneous, ulnar and superficial radial nerves.
  3. Afferent volleys, which hardly modified the H reflex, significantly facilitated the corticospinal response produced by weak TMS. In PSTHs, the central delay of the peripheral facilitation of the peak of corticospinal excitation in MNs located at either end of the cervical enlargement was longer the more caudal the MN pool, suggesting an interaction in premotoneurones located rostral to the tested MNs.
  4. Small increases in the strength of TMS (~2-5 % of the maximal stimulator output) caused the facilitation to disappear and then to be reversed to inhibition. The facilitatory and inhibitory effects had the same latencies and spared the initial 0.5-1 ms of the corticospinal excitatory response. Both effects were more readily demonstrable when there was a co-contraction of the target muscle and the muscle innervated by nerve used for the conditioning stimulus.
  5. The above features suggest that the inhibition resulted from disfacilitation due to suppression of corticospinal excitation passing through the presumed premotoneuronal relay. The reversal of the facilitation to inhibition by stronger corticospinal volleys is consistent with a well-developed system of 'feedback inhibitory interneurones' activated by corticospinal and afferent inputs inhibiting the presumed propriospinal excitatory premotoneurones.
  6. It is argued that these findings might explain why simply stimulating the pyramidal tract or the motor cortex would fail to demonstrate this indirect corticospinal projection in the macaque monkey and in humans.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
K. Stecina, E. Jankowska, A. Cabaj, L.-G. Pettersson, B. A. Bannatyne, and D. J. Maxwell
Premotor interneurones contributing to actions of feline pyramidal tract neurones on ipsilateral hindlimb motoneurones
J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 557 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. Iglesias, V. Marchand-Pauvert, G. Lourenco, D. Burke, and E. Pierrot-Deseilligny
Task-related changes in propriospinal excitation from hand muscles to human flexor carpi radialis motoneurones
J. Physiol., August 1, 2007; 582(3): 1361 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. G. Martin, S. C. Gandevia, and J. L. Taylor
Muscle fatigue changes cutaneous suppression of propriospinal drive to human upper limb muscles
J. Physiol., April 1, 2007; 580(1): 211 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Isa, Y. Ohki, K. Seki, and B. Alstermark
Properties of Propriospinal Neurons in the C3-C4 Segments Mediating Disynaptic Pyramidal Excitation to Forelimb Motoneurons in the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3674 - 3685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. Mazevet, S. Meunier, P. Pradat-Diehl, V. Marchand-Pauvert, and E. Pierrot-Deseilligny
Changes in propriospinally mediated excitation of upper limb motoneurons in stroke patients
Brain, April 1, 2003; 126(4): 988 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Olivier, S. N. Baker, K. Nakajima, T. Brochier, and R. N. Lemon
Investigation Into Non-Monosynaptic Corticospinal Excitation of Macaque Upper Limb Single Motor Units
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 1573 - 1586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 The Physiological Society.