J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 535, Number 2, 619-623, September 1, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mekjavic, I. B.
Right arrow Articles by Eiken, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mekjavic, I. B.
Right arrow Articles by Eiken, O.
Journal of Physiology (2001), 535.2, pp. 619-623
© Copyright 2001 The Physiological Society

Motion sickness potentiates core cooling during immersion in humans


Igor B. Mekjavic *, Michael J. Tipton *, Mikael Gennser † and Ola Eiken


Department of Aviation Medicine, Swedish Defence Research Establishment, Karolinska Institutet, Berzelius v. 13, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden, * Institute of Biomedical & Biomolecular Sciences, Department of Sports and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DT, UK and † Department of Naval Medicine, Swedish Defence Research Establishment, SE-13061 Hårsfjärden, Sweden

  1. The present study tested the hypothesis that motion sickness affects thermoregulatory responses to cooling in humans.
  2. Ten healthy male volunteers underwent three separate head-out immersions in 28 °C water after different preparatory procedures. In the 'control' procedure immersion was preceded by a rest period. In the 'motion sickness' procedure immersion was preceded by provocation of motion sickness in a human centrifuge. This comprised rapid and repeated alterations of the gravitational (G-) stress in the head-to-foot direction, plus a standardized regimen of head movements at increased G-stress. In the 'G-control' procedure, the subjects were exposed to similar G-stress, but without the motion sickness provocation.
  3. During immersion mean skin temperature, rectal temperature, the difference in temperature between the forearm and 3rd digit of the right hand (DeltaTforearm-fingertip), oxygen uptake and heart rate were recorded. Subjects provided ratings of temperature perception, thermal comfort and level of motion sickness discomfort at regular intervals.
  4. No differences were observed in any of the variables between control and G-control procedures. In the motion sickness procedure, the DeltaTforearm-fingertip response was significantly attenuated, indicating a blunted vasoconstrictor response, and rectal temperature decreased at a faster rate. No other differences were observed.
  5. Motion sickness attenuates the vasoconstrictor response to skin and core cooling, thereby enhancing heat loss and the magnitude of the fall in deep body temperature. Motion sickness may predispose individuals to hypothermia, and have significant implications for survival time in maritime accidents.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
I. B. Mekjavic and O. Eiken
Contribution of thermal and nonthermal factors to the regulation of body temperature in humans
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2006; 100(6): 2065 - 2072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 The Physiological Society.