J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 536, Number 1, 167-187, October 1, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhodes, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Llinás, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rhodes, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Llinás, R. R.
Journal of Physiology (2001), 536.1, pp. 167-187
© Copyright 2001 The Physiological Society

Apical tuft input efficacy in layer 5 pyramidal cells from rat visual cortex


Paul A. Rhodes and Rodolfo R. Llinás


Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, New York University Medical School, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA

  1. The integration of synaptic inputs to the apical dendrite of layer 5 neocortical pyramidal cells was studied using compartment model simulations. The goal was to characterize the generation of regenerative responses to synaptic inputs under two conditions: (a) where there was an absence of background synaptic input, and (b) when the entire cell surface was subjected to a uniform blanket of synaptic background conductance such that somatic input resistance was reduced 5-fold.
  2. Dendritic morphology corresponded to a layer 5 thick-trunked pyramidal cell from rat primary visual cortex at postnatal day 28 (P28), with distribution of dendritic active currents guided by the electrophysiological characteristics of the apical trunk reported in this cell type. Response characteristics for two dendritic channel distributions were compared, one of which supported Ca2+ spikes in the apical dendrite.
  3. In the absence of background, synaptic input to the apical tuft was surprisingly effective in eliciting somatic firing when compared with input to apical oblique branches. This result obtained even when the tuft membrane was the least excitable in the dendritic tree.
  4. The special efficacy of tuft input arose because its electrotonic characteristics favour development of a sustained depolarization which charged the apex of the apical trunk to its firing threshold; once initiated in the distal trunk, firing propagated inward to the soma. This mechanism did not depend upon the presence of depolarizing channels in tuft membrane, but did require an excitable apical trunk.
  5. Rather than disconnect the tuft, background synaptic conductance enhanced the efficacy advantage enjoyed by input arriving there. This counterintuitive result arose because background reduced the subthreshold spread of voltage, and so diminished the ability of the excitation of various individual oblique branches to combine to charge the relatively thick adjacent trunk. In contrast, drive from the depolarized tuft is exerted at a single critical point, the apex of the distal trunk, and so was relatively undiminished by the background. Further, once initiation at the apex occurred, background had little effect on inward propagation along the trunk.
  6. We conclude that synaptic input to the apical tuft of layer 5 cells may be unexpectedly effective in triggering cell firing in vivo. The advantage in efficacy was not dependent upon the characteristics of tuft membrane excitability, but rather stemmed from the geometry of the tuft and its junction with the distal apical trunk. The efficacy of tuft input was, however, critically dependent upon inward propagation, suggesting that modulation of membrane currents which affect propagation in the apical trunk might sensitively control the efficacy of tuft input.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. E. Larkum, S. Watanabe, N. Lasser-Ross, P. Rhodes, and W. N. Ross
Dendritic Properties of Turtle Pyramidal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 683 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. T. Schaefer, M. Helmstaedter, A. C. Schmitt, D. Bar-Yehuda, M. Almog, H. Ben-Porat, B. Sakmann, and A. Korngreen
Dendritic voltage-gated K+ conductance gradient in pyramidal neurones of neocortical layer 5B from rats
J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 737 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Santamaria, P. G. Tripp, and J. M. Bower
Feedforward Inhibition Controls the Spread of Granule Cell-Induced Purkinje Cell Activity in the Cerebellar Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 248 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Rhodes
The properties and implications of NMDA spikes in neocortical pyramidal cells.
J. Neurosci., June 21, 2006; 26(25): 6704 - 6715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Izquierdo, C. L. Wellman, and A. Holmes
Brief Uncontrollable Stress Causes Dendritic Retraction in Infralimbic Cortex and Resistance to Fear Extinction in Mice
J. Neurosci., May 24, 2006; 26(21): 5733 - 5738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Keren, N. Peled, and A. Korngreen
Constraining Compartmental Models Using Multiple Voltage Recordings and Genetic Algorithms
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3730 - 3742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. A. Hossain, S. D. Antic, Y. Yang, M. N. Rasband, and D. K. Morest
Where Is the Spike Generator of the Cochlear Nerve? Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in the Mouse Cochlea
J. Neurosci., July 20, 2005; 25(29): 6857 - 6868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. D. Traub, D. Contreras, M. O. Cunningham, H. Murray, F. E. N. LeBeau, A. Roopun, A. Bibbig, W. B. Wilent, M. J. Higley, and M. A. Whittington
Single-Column Thalamocortical Network Model Exhibiting Gamma Oscillations, Sleep Spindles, and Epileptogenic Bursts
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2194 - 2232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Santamaria and J. M. Bower
Background Synaptic Activity Modulates the Response of a Modeled Purkinje Cell to Paired Afferent Input
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 237 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Y. Wang, M. Toledo-Rodriguez, A. Gupta, C. Wu, G. Silberberg, J. Luo, and H. Markram
Anatomical, physiological and molecular properties of Martinotti cells in the somatosensory cortex of the juvenile rat
J. Physiol., November 15, 2004; 561(1): 65 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Crochet, P. Fuentealba, I. Timofeev, and M. Steriade
Selective Amplification of Neocortical Neuronal Output by Fast Prepotentials InVivo
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2004; 14(10): 1110 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. E. Larkum, W. Senn, and H.-R. Luscher
Top-down Dendritic Input Increases the Gain of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2004; 14(10): 1059 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Berger, W. Senn, and H.-R. Luscher
Hyperpolarization-Activated Current Ih Disconnects Somatic and Dendritic Spike Initiation Zones in Layer V Pyramidal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2428 - 2437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Rudolph and A. Destexhe
A Fast-Conducting, Stochastic Integrative Mode for Neocortical Neurons InVivo
J. Neurosci., March 15, 2003; 23(6): 2466 - 2476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. E. Larkum and J. J. Zhu
Signaling of Layer 1 and Whisker-Evoked Ca2+ and Na+ Action Potentials in Distal and Terminal Dendrites of Rat Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons In Vitro and In Vivo
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2002; 22(16): 6991 - 7005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 The Physiological Society.