HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 538/1/279    most recent 2001.013200v1 Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McNulty, P. A. Articles by Hallett, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McNulty, P. A. Articles by Hallett, M.

Cortically evoked neural volleys to the human hand are increased during ischaemic block of the forearm

P. A. McNulty, V. G. Macefield, J. L. Taylor and M. Hallett *

Reorganisation of the motor cortex may occur after limb amputation or spinal cord injury. In humans, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) shows expansion of motor cortical representations of muscles proximal to the injury. Similarly, ischaemic block of the hand can increase acutely the representation of the biceps muscle, measured by increased biceps motor potentials evoked by TMS. It is thought that this increase occurs at the expense of the cortical representation of the paralysed and deafferented hand muscles but this has never been investigated. To study what changes occur in the cortical representation of the hand muscles during ischaemic block, a tungsten microelectrode was inserted into the ulnar or median nerve above the elbow and the size of the neural potential elicited by TMS in fascicles supplying the hand was measured in seven subjects. Prior to ischaemia, TMS evoked EMG responses in the intrinsic hand muscles. In the nerve, a brief motor potential preceded the response in the muscle and was followed by a contraction-induced sensory potential. During 40 min of ischaemia produced by a blood pressure cuff inflated around the forearm to 210 mmHg, the EMG response to TMS and the sensory potential from the hand were progressively blocked. However, the motor neural evoked potential showed a significant increase in amplitude during the ischaemic period (30.5 %, P = 0.005). The increase in the neural potential suggests that output to the hand evoked from the cortex by TMS was not decreased by ischaemic block. Thus, we conclude that the increased response of biceps to TMS during distal ischaemia is not accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the motor cortical representation of the hand.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Bretzner and T. Drew Changes in Corticospinal Efficacy Contribute to the Locomotor Plasticity Observed After Unilateral Cutaneous Denervation of the Hindpaw in the Cat J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2911 - 2927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Ziemann, G. F. Wittenberg, and L. G. Cohen Stimulation-Induced Within-Representation and Across-Representation Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex J. Neurosci., July 1, 2002; 22(13): 5563 - 5571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Werhahn, J. Mortensen, A. Kaelin-Lang, B. Boroojerdi, and L. G. Cohen Cortical excitability changes induced by deafferentation of the contralateral hemisphere Brain, June 1, 2002; 125(6): 1402 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]