J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 538, Number 2, 341-, January 15, 2002 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013599
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Perspectives
Journal of Physiology (2002), 538.2, p. 341
© Copyright 2002 The Physiological Society
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013599

How do veins talk to arteries?

John M. Johnson

Department of Physiology, University of Texas, Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive-MSC 7756, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA

Acute venous congestion of a limb leads to localized vasoconstriction (Skagen, 1983; Henriksen, 1991; Vissing & Secher, 1997). This response exists in all tissues of the limbs, including subcutaneous adipose, muscle and skin. The general nature suggests similar mechanisms. Graded lowering of the limb from above to below heart level has little effect on blood flow until veins are no longer collapsed and venous pressure and volume rise. At that time there is a sharp increase in vascular resistance and a frank reduction in blood flow (Henriksen, 1991). Myogenic mechanisms probably explain the constant flow phase but not the period of significantly reduced blood flow.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 The Physiological Society.