J Physiol Boston Smyposia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 544, Number 1, 137-147, October 1, 2002 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.025254
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
544/1/137    most recent
2002.025254v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Black, J. D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Black, J. D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, E. D.
Journal of Physiology (2002), 544.1, pp. 137-147
© Copyright 2002 The Physiological Society
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.025254

A 2 week routine stretching programme did not prevent contraction-induced injury in mouse muscle

Jonathon D. J. Black, Marcus Freeman and E. Don Stevens

Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

Most athletes stretch as part of their training regimen and it is commonly believed that this practice prevents muscle injury. We tested this belief using an animal model, in situ mouse extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle. One lower hindlimb was slowly stretched for 1 min on alternate days for 12 days; the other leg served as a control. The mouse was lightly anaesthetized during the stretching protocol (isofluorane). Both legs were tested in situ by measuring maximum isometric force and maximum work before and after an eccentric contraction that was designed to cause a contraction-induced injury. The difference between a contraction before and after (i.e. the deficit) was used as a measure of damage caused by the eccentric contraction. There was a threshold for force deficit at a peak to peak eccentric excursion amplitude of 19.5 % (i.e. Lo ± 9.75 %, where Lo is muscle length at peak isometric force). There was a significant increase in force deficit, work deficit, and curve shift with an increase in eccentric excursion amplitude above the threshold. There was no statistical difference in the force deficit, work deficit, or curve shift between the stretched leg and the control leg (P > 0.05). A routine stretching programme, at least at the intensities employed in this experiment, did not prevent contraction-induced injury in the in situ mouse EDL muscle.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
N. C. Lockhart and S. V. Brooks
Protection from contraction-induced injury provided to skeletal muscles of young and old mice by passive stretch is not due to a decrease in initial mechanical damage.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2006; 61(6): 527 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 The Physiological Society.