J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 544, Number 2, 617-629, October 15, 2002 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.028670
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
544/2/617    most recent
2002.028670v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sailer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sailer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, R.
Journal of Physiology (2002), 544.2, pp. 617-629
© Copyright 2002 The Physiological Society
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.028670

Effects of peripheral sensory input on cortical inhibition in humans

Alexandra Sailer, Gregory F. Molnar, Danny I. Cunic and Robert Chen

Division of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital and Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Cortical inhibitory systems play an important role in motor output. The motor cortex can be inhibited by intracortical mechanisms and by peripheral sensory inputs. We examined whether cortical inhibition from peripheral sensory input is mediated through previously identified intracortical inhibitory systems and how these inhibitory systems interact. Two types of intracortical inhibition were assessed by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was determined with a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (CS) followed by a test stimulus 2 ms later and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) with suprathreshold conditioning and test stimuli 100 ms apart. Cortical inhibition from peripheral sensory input was induced by median nerve stimulation (MNS) of the right hand and followed by a suprathreshold TMS over the left motor cortex 200 ms later. The first set of experiments tested the effects of different test stimulus intensities on SICI, LICI and cortical inhibition induced by median nerve stimulation (MNSI). With higher test stimulus intensities, LICI and MNSI decreased whereas SICI showed a trend towards an increase. The extent of SICI, LICI and MNSI did not correlate. The second experiment assessed the interaction between MNSI and LICI. The results of applying MNSI and LICI simultaneously were compared with MNSI and LICI alone. MNSI was virtually abolished in the presence of LICI and LICI was also significantly decreased in the presence of MNSI. Thus, the effects of MNSI and LICI when applied together were much less than their expected additive effects when applied alone. The degree of interaction between MNSI and LICI was related to the combined strength of MNSI and LICI but not to the strength of LICI alone. The third experiment investigated the interaction between SICI and MNSI. MNSI and SICI were applied together and the results were compared with MNSI and SICI alone. SICI remained unchanged in the presence of MNSI. We conclude that MNSI is mediated by circuits distinct from those mediating LICI or SICI. The MNSI circuits seem to have an inhibitory interaction with the LICI circuits, whereas the SICI and MNSI circuits do not seem to interact.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
F. D. Roy and M. A. Gorassini
Peripheral sensory activation of cortical circuits in the leg motor cortex of man
J. Physiol., September 1, 2008; 586(17): 4091 - 4105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Reis, O. B. Swayne, Y. Vandermeeren, M. Camus, M. A. Dimyan, M. Harris-Love, M. A. Perez, P. Ragert, J. C. Rothwell, and L. G. Cohen
Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control
J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 325 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. P. Coxon, C. M. Stinear, and W. D. Byblow
Intracortical Inhibition During Volitional Inhibition of Prepared Action
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3371 - 3383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Voller, A. St Clair Gibson, M. Lomarev, S. Kanchana, J. Dambrosia, N. Dang, and M. Hallett
Long-Latency Afferent Inhibition During Selective Finger Movement
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1115 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Kukaswadia, A. Wagle-Shukla, F. Morgante, C. Gunraj, and R. Chen
Interactions between long latency afferent inhibition and interhemispheric inhibitions in the human motor cortex
J. Physiol., March 15, 2005; 563(3): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Sailer, G. F. Molnar, G. Paradiso, C. A. Gunraj, A. E. Lang, and R. Chen
Short and long latency afferent inhibition in Parkinson's disease
Brain, August 1, 2003; 126(8): 1883 - 1894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 The Physiological Society.