J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 545, Number 1, 313-319, November 15, 2002 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.027938
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
545/1/313    most recent
2002.027938v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorist, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zijdewind, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorist, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zijdewind, I.
Journal of Physiology (2002), 545.1, pp. 313-319
© Copyright 2002 The Physiological Society
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.027938

Motor fatigue and cognitive task performance in humans

Monicque M. Lorist *†, Daniel Kernell *, Theo F. Meijman† and Inge Zijdewind *

Departments of *Medical Physiology and †Experimental and Work Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

During fatiguing submaximal contractions a constant force production can be obtained at the cost of an increasing central command intensity. Little is known about the interaction between the underlying central mechanisms driving motor behaviour and cognitive functions. To address this issue, subjects performed four tasks: an auditory choice reaction task (CRT), a CRT simultaneously with a fatiguing or a non-fatiguing submaximal muscle contraction task, and a fatiguing submaximal contraction task alone. Results showed that performance in the single-CRT condition was relatively stable. However, in the fatiguing dual-task condition, performance levels in the cognitive CRT deteriorated drastically with time-on-task. Moreover, in the fatiguing dual-task condition the rise in force variability was significantly larger than during the fatiguing submaximal contraction alone. Thus, our results indicate a mutual interaction between cognitive functions and the central mechanisms driving motor behaviour during fatigue. The precise nature of this interference, and at what level this interaction takes place is still unknown.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. L. Smith, J. E. Butler, P. G. Martin, R. A. McBain, and J. L. Taylor
Increased ventilation does not impair maximal voluntary contractions of the elbow flexors
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1674 - 1682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. M. Enoka and J. Duchateau
Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function
J. Physiol., January 1, 2008; 586(1): 11 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. P. Regnaux, D. David, O. Daniel, D. B. Smail, M. Combeaud, and B. Bussel
Evidence for Cognitive Processes Involved in the Control of Steady State of Walking in Healthy Subjects and after Cerebral Damage
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2005; 19(2): 125 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 The Physiological Society.