HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 545/3/1041    most recent 2002.025049v2 2002.025049v1 Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Loram, I. D. Articles by Lakie, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Loram, I. D. Articles by Lakie, M.

Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: the intrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability

Ian D. Loram and Martin Lakie

During quiet standing the human 'inverted pendulum' sways irregularly. In previous work where subjects balanced a real inverted pendulum, we investigated what contribution the intrinsic mechanical ankle stiffness makes to achieve stability. Using the results of a plausible model, we suggested that intrinsic ankle stiffness is inadequate for providing stability. Here, using a piezo-electric translator we applied small, unobtrusive mechanical perturbations to the foot while the subject was standing freely. These short duration perturbations had a similar size and velocity to movements which occur naturally during quiet standing, and they produced no evidence of any stretch reflex response in soleus, or gastrocnemius. Direct measurement confirms our earlier conclusion; intrinsic ankle stiffness is not quite sufficient to stabilise the body or pendulum. On average the directly determined intrinsic stiffness is 91 ± 23 % (mean ± S.D.) of that necessary to provide minimal stabilisation. The stiffness was substantially constant, increasing only slightly with ankle torque. This stiffness cannot be neurally regulated in quiet standing. Thus we attribute this stiffness to the foot, Achilles' tendon and aponeurosis rather than the activated calf muscle fibres. Our measurements suggest that the triceps surae muscles maintain balance via a spring-like element which is itself too compliant to guarantee stability. The implication is that the brain cannot set ankle stiffness and then ignore the control task because additional modulation of torque is required to maintain balance. We suggest that the triceps surae muscles maintain balance by predictively controlling the proximal offset of the spring-like element in a ballistic-like manner.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Masani, A. H. Vette, N. Kawashima, and M. R. Popovic Neuromusculoskeletal Torque-Generation Process Has a Large Destabilizing Effect on the Control Mechanism of Quiet Standing J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1465 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Z. Z. Chew, S. C. Gandevia, and R. C. Fitzpatrick Postural control at the human wrist J. Physiol., March 1, 2008; 586(5): 1265 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D. Loram, C. N. Maganaris, and M. Lakie The passive, human calf muscles in relation to standing: the non-linear decrease from short range to long range stiffness J. Physiol., October 15, 2007; 584(2): 661 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D. Loram, C. N. Maganaris, and M. Lakie The passive, human calf muscles in relation to standing: the short range stiffness lies in the contractile component J. Physiol., October 15, 2007; 584(2): 677 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Johannsen, A. M. Wing, and V. Hatzitaki Effects of Maintaining Touch Contact on Predictive and Reactive Balance J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2686 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.-L. Hsu, J. P. Scholz, G. Schoner, J. J. Jeka, and T. Kiemel Control and Estimation of Posture During Quiet Stance Depends on Multijoint Coordination J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3024 - 3035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Guigon, P. Baraduc, and M. Desmurget Computational Motor Control: Redundancy and Invariance J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 331 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lakie and I. D. Loram Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 403 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D. Loram, P. J. Gawthrop, and M. Lakie The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 417 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C Fitzpatrick and S. C Gandevia Paradoxical muscle contractions and the neural control of movement and balance J. Physiol., April 1, 2005; 564(1): 2 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D Loram, C. N Maganaris, and M. Lakie Human postural sway results from frequent, ballistic bias impulses by soleus and gastrocnemius J. Physiol., April 1, 2005; 564(1): 295 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D Loram, C. N Maganaris, and M. Lakie Active, non-spring-like muscle movements in human postural sway: how might paradoxical changes in muscle length be produced? J. Physiol., April 1, 2005; 564(1): 281 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Maurer and R. J. Peterka A New Interpretation of Spontaneous Sway Measures Based on a Simple Model of Human Postural Control J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 189 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Jeka, T. Kiemel, R. Creath, F. Horak, and R. Peterka Controlling Human Upright Posture: Velocity Information Is More Accurate Than Position or Acceleration J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2368 - 2379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D. Loram, C. N. Maganaris, and M. Lakie Paradoxical muscle movement in human standing J. Physiol., May 1, 2004; 556(3): 683 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]