J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 548, Number 2, 336-337, April 15, 2003 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.040394
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Original Classic Paper
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
548/2/336    most recent
2003.040394v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roddie, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roddie, I. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Classical Perspectives
J Physiol (2003), 548.2, pp. 336-337
© Copyright 2003 D 2003 The Physiological Society
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.040394

Sympathetic vasodilatation in human skin

Email: icroddie@mercuryin.es

Professor Emeritus, The Queen's University of Belfast, UK

In the decades preceding and following the Second World War, knowledge about the human peripheral circulation increased rapidly. A number of factors contributed. One was the increasing interest in the field and the analytical techniques used initially by Sir Thomas Lewis at the Department of Medicine, University College London, and spread by some of his colleagues, G. W. Pickering, R. T. Grant and R. S. B. Pearson. Another was the increased use of venous occlusion plethysmography for non-invasive measurements of blood flow in human limbs (Lewis & Grant, 1925; Grant & Pearson, 1938; Barcroft & Edholm, 1943; Greenfield, 1954). Subjects suffered little discomfort with this technique so it was relatively easy to recruit students and colleagues as volunteers for experiments. Before the advent of 'Research Ethical Committees' in the 1960s, there were fewer constraints on working with human subjects. Experimenters, most of whom had medical qualifications, conformed to their own (usually high) ethical standards. They were familiar with clinical procedures and the risks involved but controversy did arise from time to time (Roddie, 1977). Such work might be more difficult to do today because of ethical, medico-legal and bureaucratic considerations but it does continue despite these problems (Joyner & Halliwill, 2000). It is important that it does so if we are to understand how new molecular information might or might not operate in whole humans.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. L. Kellogg Jr., G. J. Hodges, C. R. Orozco, T. M. Phillips, J. L. Zhao, and J. M. Johnson
Cholinergic mechanisms of cutaneous active vasodilation during heat stress in cystic fibrosis
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 963 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. L. Kellogg Jr
In vivo mechanisms of cutaneous vasodilation and vasoconstriction in humans during thermoregulatory challenges
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2006; 100(5): 1709 - 1718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. G. Crandall, D. M. Meyer, S. L. Davis, and S. M. Dellaria
Palmar Skin Blood Flow and Temperature Responses Throughout Endoscopic Sympathectomy
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 277 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.