J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 548, Number 3, 667-675, May 1, 2003 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.035469
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
548/3/667    most recent
2002.035469v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, S.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, S.-Y.
J Physiol (2003), 548.3, pp. 667-675
© Copyright 2003 D 2003 The Physiological Society
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.035469

Veratridine block of rat skeletal muscle Nav1.4 sodium channels in the inner vestibule

Ging Kuo Wang and Sho-Ya Wang

Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA and Department of Biology, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY, USA

Veratridine (VTD) is an alkaloid toxin found in Liliaceae plants. VTD causes persistent opening of the voltage-gated Na+ channel and reduces its single-channel conductance by 75 %. The mechanisms for these different VTD actions are unknown. Recent reports indicate that the VTD receptor aligns closely with the local anaesthetic (LA) receptor, which resides at D1S6, D3S6 and D4S6 of the Na+ channel alpha-subunit. To study this alignment, we created a mutant with cysteine substitutions at three S6 residues (rNav1.4-N434C/L1280C/F1579C). Under voltage-clamp conditions, amitriptyline and bupivacaine remained as potent blockers of this mutant channel when expressed in human embryonic kidney cells, whereas VTD completely failed to cause persistent opening. Unexpectedly, VTD at 100 µM progressively blocked mutant currents by 90.4 ± 1.6 % (n = 5), as assayed at 0.1 Hz for 15 min. This VTD block was reversed little during wash-off: ~70 % of mutant currents did not return in 30 min. An increase in channel opening either by repetitive pulses at 1 Hz or by the inhibition of the fast inactivation hastened the VTD block. Co-application of amitriptyline or bupivacaine, which targeted the LA receptor, prevented this VTD block. Our data suggest that (a) the VTD receptor and the LA receptor overlap extensively, (b) receptor-bound VTD lies in the inner vestibule, and (c) VTD blocks this mutant channel as a bona fide Na+ channel blocker. We propose that VTD likewise blocks the wild-type open Na+ channel, albeit partially, to decrease the unitary conductance and to stabilize the open conformation for persistent opening.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
W. Ulbricht
Sodium Channel Inactivation: Molecular Determinants and Modulation
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2005; 85(4): 1271 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.