J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 551, Number 2, 649-660, September 1, 2003 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.043752
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
551/2/649    most recent
jphysiol.2003.043752v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenkranz, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rothwell, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenkranz, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rothwell, J. C.
J Physiol (2003), 551.2, pp. 649-660
© Copyright 2003 The Physiological Society
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.043752

Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans

Karin Rosenkranz and John C. Rothwell

Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, London, UK

Low amplitude muscle vibration (0.5 ms; 80 Hz; duration 1.5 s) was applied in turn to each of three different intrinsic hand muscles (first dorsal interosseus, FDI; abductor pollicis brevis, APB; and abductor digiti minimi, ADM) in order to test its effect on the EMG responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Recordings were also taken from flexor and extensor carpi radialis (FCR and ECR, respectively). We evaluated the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by a single TMS pulse, short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation (SICI and ICF) and long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). TMS pulses were applied 1 s after the start of vibration with subjects relaxed throughout. Vibration increased the amplitude of MEPs evoked in the vibrated muscle (162 ± 6 % of MEP with no vibration; mean ± S.E.M.), but suppressed MEPs in the two non-vibrated hand muscles (72 ± 9 %). Compared with no vibration (test response reduced to 51 ± 5 % of control), there was less SICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 92 ± 28 % of control) and more in the non-vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 27 ± 5 % of control). The opposite occurred for LICI: compared with the no vibration condition (test response reduced to 33 ± 6 % control), there was more LICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 17 ± 3 % control) than in the non-vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 80 ± 11 % control) even when the intensity of the test stimulus was adjusted to compensate for the changes in baseline MEP. There was no effect on ICF. Cutaneous stimulation of the index finger (80 Hz, 1.5 s duration, twice sensory threshold) had no consistent differential effect on any of the parameters. We conclude that vibratory input from muscle can differentially modulate excitability in motor cortical circuits.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Duque and R. B. Ivry
Role of Corticospinal Suppression during Motor Preparation
Cereb Cortex, January 6, 2009; (2009) bhn230v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
K. N. Mileva, J. L. Bowtell, and A. R. Kossev
Effects of low-frequency whole-body vibration on motor-evoked potentials in healthy men
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2009; 94(1): 103 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. M. Schabrun, C. M. Stinear, W. D. Byblow, and M. C. Ridding
Normalizing Motor Cortex Representations in Focal Hand Dystonia
Cereb Cortex, December 12, 2008; (2008) bhn224v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
F. D. Roy and M. A. Gorassini
Peripheral sensory activation of cortical circuits in the leg motor cortex of man
J. Physiol., September 1, 2008; 586(17): 4091 - 4105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. Rosenkranz, K. Butler, A. Williamon, C. Cordivari, A. J. Lees, and J. C. Rothwell
Sensorimotor reorganization by proprioceptive training in musician's dystonia and writer's cramp
Neurology, January 22, 2008; 70(4): 304 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Reis, O. B. Swayne, Y. Vandermeeren, M. Camus, M. A. Dimyan, M. Harris-Love, M. A. Perez, P. Ragert, J. C. Rothwell, and L. G. Cohen
Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control
J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 325 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Rosenkranz, A. Kacar, and J. C. Rothwell
Differential Modulation of Motor Cortical Plasticity and Excitability in Early and Late Phases of Human Motor Learning
J. Neurosci., October 31, 2007; 27(44): 12058 - 12066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. P. Coxon, C. M. Stinear, and W. D. Byblow
Intracortical Inhibition During Volitional Inhibition of Prepared Action
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3371 - 3383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. Rosenkranz, A. Williamon, K. Butler, C. Cordivari, A. J. Lees, and J. C. Rothwell
Pathophysiological differences between musician's dystonia and writer's cramp
Brain, April 1, 2005; 128(4): 918 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
K. Rosenkranz and J. C Rothwell
The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex
J. Physiol., November 15, 2004; 561(1): 307 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.