J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 554, Number 1, 13-21, January 1, 2004 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049494
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
554/1/13    most recent
jphysiol.2003.049494v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, W. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, W. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Review articles

TOPICAL REVIEW

Moving forward with chemical mutagenesis in the mouse

Timothy P. O'Brien and Wayne N. Frankel

The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA

The study of genetic variation in mice offers a powerful experimental platform for understanding gene function. Complex trait analysis, gene-targeting and gene-trapping technologies, as well as insertional and chemical mutagenesis approaches are becoming increasingly sophisticated and provide a variety of options for cataloguing gene activities and interactions. In this review we discuss fundamental and practical concepts related to chemical mutagenesis and we highlight the growing list of strategies for performing mutagenesis screens in mice. Gene-driven and diverse types of phenotype-driven screens provide several options for the recovery of the invaluable variety of alleles generated by chemical mutagenesis. The unique advantages offered using chemical mutagenesis compare favourably to and complement the spectrum of approaches available for functional annotation of the mammalian genome.

(Received 17 June 2003; accepted after revision 16 October 2003; first published online 17 October 2003)
Corresponding author T. P. O'Brien: The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.  Email: tpo{at}jax.org




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Liu, G.A. Wood, L. Morikawa, R. Ayearst, C. Fleming, and C. McKerlie
Restoration of fertility by orthotopic transplantation of frozen adult mouse ovaries
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 122 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. M. G. Smits, T. A. Peters, J. D. Mul, H. J. Croes, J. A. M. Fransen, A. J. Beynon, V. Guryev, R. H. A. Plasterk, and E. Cuppen
Identification of a Rat Model for Usher Syndrome Type 1B by N-Ethyl-N-nitrosourea Mutagenesis-Driven Forward Genetics
Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1887 - 1896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. L. Youngentob
A Method for the Rapid Automated Assessment of Olfactory Function
Chem Senses, March 1, 2005; 30(3): 219 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 The Physiological Society.