|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Pharmacology 2 Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan 3 Department of Neurophysiology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Systemic or intraventricular administration of cannabinoids causes analgesic effects, but relatively little is known for their cellular mechanism. Using brainstem slices with the mandibular nerve attached, we examined the effect of cannabinoids on glutamatergic transmission in superficial trigeminal caudal nucleus of juvenile rats. The exogenous cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (WIN), as well as the endogenous agonist anandamide, hyperpolarized trigeminal caudal neurones and depressed the amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) or currents (EPSCs) monosynaptically evoked by stimulating mandibular nerves in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory action of WIN was blocked or fully reversed by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A. WIN had no effect on the amplitude of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) recorded in the presence of tetrodotoxin or cadmium. The inhibitory effect of WIN on EPSCs was greater for those with longer synaptic latency, suggesting that cannabinoids have a stronger effect on C-fibre EPSPs than on A
-fibre EPSPs. Ba2+ (100 µM) blocked the hyperpolarizing effect of cannabinoids, but did not affect their inhibitory effect on EPSPs. The N-type Ca2+ channel blocker
-conotoxin GVIA (
-CgTX) occluded the WIN-mediated presynaptic inhibition, whereas the P/Q-type Ca2+ channel blocker
-agatoxin TK (
-Aga) had no effect. These results suggest that cannabinoids preferentially activate CB1 receptors at the nerve terminal of small-diameter primary afferent fibres. Upon activation, CB1 receptors may selectively inhibit presynaptic N-type Ca2+ channels and exocytotic release machinery, thereby attenuating the transmitter release at the trigeminal nociceptive synapses.
(Received 17 October 2003;
accepted after revision 9 December 2003;
first published online 12 December 2003)
Corresponding author K.-S. Hsu: Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, Ta-Hsiue Road, Tainan City 701, Taiwan. Email: richard{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Sanchez-Pastor, X. Trujillo, M. Huerta, and F. Andrade Effects of Cannabinoids on Synaptic Transmission in the Frog Neuromuscular Junction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 439 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fisyunov, V. Tsintsadze, R. Min, N. Burnashev, and N. Lozovaya Cannabinoids Modulate the P-Type High-Voltage-Activated Calcium Currents in Purkinje Neurons J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1267 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Rusakov, F. Saitow, K. P. Lehre, and S. Konishi Modulation of Presynaptic Ca2+ Entry by AMPA Receptors at Individual GABAergic Synapses in the Cerebellum J. Neurosci., May 18, 2005; 25(20): 4930 - 4940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Brown, P. K. Safo, and W. G. Regehr Endocannabinoids Inhibit Transmission at Granule Cell to Purkinje Cell Synapses by Modulating Three Types of Presynaptic Calcium Channels J. Neurosci., June 16, 2004; 24(24): 5623 - 5631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |