J Physiol Boston Smyposia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 559, Number 2, 519-533, September 1, 2004 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.069096
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
559/2/519    most recent
jphysiol.2004.069096v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barclay, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barclay, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, C. L.

Slow skeletal muscles of the mouse have greater initial efficiency than fast muscles but the same net efficiency

C. J. Barclay and C. L. Weber

School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science and Heart Foundation Research Centre, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

The aim of this study was to determine whether the net efficiency of mammalian muscles depends on muscle fibre type. Experiments were performed in vitro (35°C) using bundles of muscle fibres from the slow-twitch soleus and fast-twitch extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of the mouse. The contraction protocol consisted of 10 brief contractions, with a cyclic length change in each contraction cycle. Work output and heat production were measured and enthalpy output (work + heat) was used as the index of energy expenditure. Initial efficiency was defined as the ratio of work output to enthalpy output during the first 1 s of activity. Net efficiency was defined as the ratio of the total work produced in all the contractions to the total, suprabasal enthalpy produced in response to the contraction series, i.e. net efficiency incorporates both initial and recovery metabolism. Initial efficiency was greater in soleus (30 ± 1%; n = 6) than EDL (23 ± 1%; n = 6) but there was no difference in net efficiency between the two muscles (12.6 ± 0.7% for soleus and 11.7 ± 0.5% for EDL). Therefore, more recovery heat was produced per unit of initial energy expenditure in soleus than EDL. The calculated efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation was lower in soleus than EDL. The difference in recovery metabolism between soleus and EDL is unlikely to be due to effects of changes in intracellular pH on the enthalpy change associated with PCr hydrolysis. It is suggested that the functionally important specialization of slow-twitch muscle is its low rate of energy use rather than high efficiency.

(Received 27 May 2004; accepted after revision 7 July 2004; first published online 8 July 2004)
Corresponding author C. J. Barclay: School of Physiotherapy & Exercise Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. Email: c.barclay{at}griffith.edu.au




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Y. Endo, M. Kobayakawa, R. Kinugasa, S. Kuno, H. Akima, H. B. Rossiter, A. Miura, and Y. Fukuba
Thigh muscle activation distribution and pulmonary VO2 kinetics during moderate, heavy, and very heavy intensity cycling exercise in humans
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): R812 - R820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. Widen and C. J. Barclay
ATP splitting by half the cross-bridges can explain the twitch energetics of mouse papillary muscle
J. Physiol., May 15, 2006; 573(1): 5 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
M. A Osborne and D. A Schneider
Muscle glycogen reduction in man: relationship between surface EMG activity and oxygen uptake kinetics during heavy exercise
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 179 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 The Physiological Society.