J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 559, Number 2, 535-542, September 1, 2004 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.067611
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
559/2/535    most recent
jphysiol.2004.067611v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pun, R. Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kleene, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pun, R. Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kleene, S. J.

An estimate of the resting membrane resistance of frog olfactory receptor neurones

Raymund Y. K. Pun1 and Steven J. Kleene2

1 Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
2 Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA

The ability of a frog olfactory receptor neurone (ORN) to respond to odorous molecules depends on its resting membrane properties, including membrane resistance and potential. Quantification of these properties is difficult because of a shunt conductance at the membrane–pipette seal that is in parallel with the true membrane conductance. In physiological salines, the sum of these two conductances averaged 235 pS. We used ionic substitution and channel blockers to reduce the membrane conductance as much as possible. This yielded a lower limit for the membrane conductance of 158 pS. The upper limit of resting membrane resistance, then, is 6 G{Omega}. The membrane is permeable to K+ and, to a lesser extent, other cations. No resting Cl conductance was detectable. Correcting measured zero-current potentials for distortion by the shunt suggests that the resting membrane potential is no more negative than –75 mV. The present results help to explain why frog ORNs are excitable at rest.

(Received 3 May 2004; accepted after revision 8 July 2004; first published online 22 July 2004)
Corresponding author R. Y. K. Pun: Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 670576, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0576, USA. Email: raymund.pun{at}uc.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. J. Kleene
The Electrochemical Basis of Odor Transduction in Vertebrate Olfactory Cilia
Chem Senses, August 14, 2008; (2008) bjn048v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. W Newell and L. C Schlichter
Integration of K+ and Cl- currents regulate steady-state and dynamic membrane potentials in cultured rat microglia
J. Physiol., September 15, 2005; 567(3): 869 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
F. Vogalis, C. C Hegg, and M. T Lucero
Ionic conductances in sustentacular cells of the mouse olfactory epithelium
J. Physiol., February 1, 2005; 562(3): 785 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 The Physiological Society.