J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 560, Number 1, 207-217, October 1, 2004 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.067686
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
560/1/207    most recent
jphysiol.2004.067686v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by He, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by He, J.

Effects of cortical stimulation on auditory-responsive thalamic neurones in anaesthetized guinea pigs

Ying Xiong1,3, Yan-Qin Yu1, Ying-Shing Chan2 and Jufang He1

1 Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
2 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
3 Laboratory of Neural Plasticity, Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

In the present study, we investigated neuronal responses to acoustic stimuli and cortical stimulation in the medial geniculate body (MGB) through in vivo intracellular recordings in anaesthetized guinea pigs. Of the 54 neurones examined with acoustic stimuli, 36 showed excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) responses and 19 showed inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) responses to acoustic stimuli. Of the 36 EPSP neurones examined with corticofugal modulation, 29 received corticofugal depolarization, 3 corticofugal inhibition, and 4 showed no effect. Of the 19 IPSP neurones, 17 received corticofugal inhibition and 2 were not affected. The mean amplitude of the EPSPs evoked by acoustic stimuli was similar to that evoked by the electrical cortical stimulation (9.19 ± 5.55 mV versus 9.22 ± 5.16 mV). There was a significant correlation between the parameters of the EPSPs evoked by an acoustic stimulus and those evoked by cortical stimulation. The mean amplitude of the IPSP evoked by electrical cortical stimulation was significantly greater than that evoked by acoustic stimuli (11.6 ± 3.8 mV versus 9.1 ± 3.7 ms, P < 0.05). Seven auditory EPSP and 7 IPSP neurones were examined with corticofugal modulation and labelled with Neurobiotin. Of the 7 EPSP neurones, 5 showed excitatory responses to cortical stimulation and 2 demonstrated no effects. Four of the 5 neurones that received corticofugal depolarization were located in the lemniscal MGB and 1 in the non-lemniscal MGB; of the remaining 2, 1 was located in the lemniscal and the other in the non-lemniscal MGB. Of the 7 IPSP neurones, 1 received an excitatory corticofugal input followed by an inhibitory input and 4 received only an inhibitory corticofugal input, while the remainder demonstrated no corticofugal effects. All 7 neurones were located in the non-lemniscal MGB. The result that both ascending and descending inputs caused similarly shaped EPSPs reflects a neuronal endogenous characteristic irrespective of the physical locations of the synapses. The IPSP responses to both acoustic stimuli and electrical cortical stimulation are likely to be caused by feedback from the thalamic reticular nucleus.

(Received 4 May 2004; accepted after revision 21 July 2004; first published online 22 July 2004)
Corresponding author J. He: Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. Email: rsjufang{at}polyu.edu.hk


Y. Xiong and Y.-Q. Yu contributed equally to this work.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Z. Zhang, C.-H. Liu, Y.-Q. Yu, K. Fujimoto, Y.-S. Chan, and J. He
Corticofugal Projection Inhibits the Auditory Thalamus Through the Thalamic Reticular Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2938 - 2945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Cotillon-Williams, C. Huetz, E. Hennevin, and J.-M. Edeline
Tonotopic Control of Auditory Thalamus Frequency Tuning by Reticular Thalamic Neurons
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1137 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Xu, C. H. Liu, Y. Xiong, and J. He
Corticofugal modulation of the auditory thalamic reticular nucleus of the guinea pig
J. Physiol., November 15, 2007; 585(1): 15 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Zhou and P. H.-S. Jen
Corticofugal Modulation of Multi-Parametric Auditory Selectivity in the Midbrain of the Big Brown Bat
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2509 - 2516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. P. Guo, X. Sun, C. Li, N. Q. Wang, Y.-S. Chan, and J. He
Corticothalamic synchronization leads to c-fos expression in the auditory thalamus
PNAS, July 10, 2007; 104(28): 11802 - 11807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Y.-Q. Yu, Y. Xiong, Y.-S. Chan, and J. He
In vivo intracellular responses of the medial geniculate neurones to acoustic stimuli in anaesthetized guinea pigs
J. Physiol., October 1, 2004; 560(1): 191 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 The Physiological Society.