J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 561, Number 2, 433-448, December 1, 2004 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.051839
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
561/2/433    most recent
jphysiol.2003.051839v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, J. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, J. L

The {alpha}1 and {alpha}6 subunit subtypes of the mammalian GABAA receptor confer distinct channel gating kinetics

Janet L Fisher1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208, USA

The GABAA receptors show a large degree of structural heterogeneity, with seven different subunit families, and 16 different subtypes in mammalian species. The {alpha} family is the largest, with six different subtypes. The {alpha}1 and {alpha}6 subtypes are among the most diverse within this family and confer distinct pharmacological properties to recombinant and neuronal receptors. To determine whether different single channel and macroscopic kinetic properties were also associated with these subtypes, the {alpha}1 or {alpha}6 subunit was expressed in mammalian cells along with ß3 and {gamma}2L subunits and the kinetic properties examined with outside-out patch recordings. The {alpha}1ß3{gamma}2L receptors responded to GABA with long-duration openings organized into multi-opening bursts. In contrast, channel openings of the {alpha}6ß3{gamma}2L receptors were predominately short in duration and occurred as isolated, single openings. The subunit subtype also affected the deactivation rate of the receptor, which was almost 2-fold slower for {alpha}6ß3{gamma}2L, compared with the {alpha}1ß3{gamma}2L isoform. Onset of fast desensitization did not differ between the isoforms. To determine the structural domains responsible for these differences in kinetic properties, we constructed six chimeric subunits, combining different regions of the {alpha}1 and {alpha}6 subunits. The properties of the chimeric subunits indicated that structures within the third transmembrane domain (TM3) and the TM3–TM4 intracellular loop conferred differences in single channel gating kinetics that subsequently affected the deactivation rate and GABA EC50. The effect of agonist concentration on the rise time of the current showed that the extracellular N-terminal domain was largely responsible for binding characteristics, while the transmembrane domains determined the activation rate at saturating GABA concentrations. This suggests that subunit structures outside of the agonist binding and pore-lining domains are responsible for the kinetic differences conferred by the {alpha}1 and {alpha}6 subtypes. Structural heterogeneity within these transmembrane and intracellular regions can therefore influence the characteristics of the postsynaptic response of GABAA receptors with different subunit composition.

(Received 1 June 2004; accepted after revision 5 October 2004; first published online 7 October 2004)
Corresponding author J. L. Fisher: Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. Email: jfisher{at}gw.med.sc.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. T. Bianchi, E. J. Botzolakis, K. F. Haas, J. L. Fisher, and R. L. Macdonald
Microscopic kinetic determinants of macroscopic currents: insights from coupling and uncoupling of GABAA receptor desensitization and deactivation
J. Physiol., November 1, 2007; 584(3): 769 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. I. Ortinski, J. R. Turner, A. Barberis, G. Motamedi, R. P. Yasuda, B. B. Wolfe, K. J. Kellar, and S. Vicini
Deletion of the GABAA Receptor {alpha}1 Subunit Increases Tonic GABAA Receptor Current: A Role for GABA Uptake Transporters
J. Neurosci., September 6, 2006; 26(36): 9323 - 9331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
B. C. Drafts and J. L. Fisher
Identification of Structures within GABAA Receptor {alpha} Subunits That Regulate the Agonist Action of Pentobarbital
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2006; 318(3): 1094 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P. Li, D. F. Covey, J. H. Steinbach, and G. Akk
Dual Potentiating and Inhibitory Actions of a Benz[e]indene Neurosteroid Analog on Recombinant {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 GABAA Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2006; 69(6): 2015 - 2026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. D. Buckingham, P. C. Biggin, B. M. Sattelle, L. A. Brown, and D. B. Sattelle
Insect GABA Receptors: Splicing, Editing, and Targeting by Antiparasitics and Insecticides
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2005; 68(4): 942 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 The Physiological Society.