HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 564/3/849    most recent jphysiol.2005.082859v2 jphysiol.2005.082859v1 Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhang, J. Articles by Wu, S. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhang, J. Articles by Wu, S. M.

¹ Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, NC-205, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Using dual whole-cell voltage and current clamp recording techniques, we investigated the gap junctional conductance and the coupling coefficient between neighbouring rods in live salamander retinal slices. The application of sinusoidal stimuli over a wide range of temporal frequencies allowed us to characterize the band-pass filtering properties of the rod network. We found that the electrical coupling of all neighbouring rods exhibited reciprocal and symmetrical conductivities. On average, the junctional conductance between paired rods was 500 pS and the coupling coefficient (the ratio of voltage responses of the follower cell to those of the driver cell), or K-value, was 0.07. Our experimental results also demonstrated that the rod network behaved like a band-pass filter with a peak frequency of about 2–5 Hz. However, the gap junctions between adjacent rods exhibited linearity and voltage independency within the physiological range of rods. These gap junctions did not contribute to the filtering mechanisms of the rod network. Combined with the computational modelling, our data suggest that the filtering of higher frequency rod signals by the network is largely mediated by the passive resistive and capacitive (RC) properties of rod plasma membranes. Furthermore, we found several attributes of rod electrical coupling resembling the physiological properties of gene-encoded Cx35/36 gap junctions examined in other in vitro studies. This indicates that the previously found Cx35/36 expression in the salamander rod network may be functionally involved in rod–rod electrical coupling.

(Received 8 January 2005; accepted after revision 25 February 2005; first published online 3 March 2005)
Corresponding author J. Zhang: Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, NC-205, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Email: jianz{at}bcm.tmc.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. B. Thoreson, N. Babai, and T. M. Bartoletti Feedback from Horizontal Cells to Rod Photoreceptors in Vertebrate Retina J. Neurosci., May 28, 2008; 28(22): 5691 - 5695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Cadetti, D. Tranchina, and W. B. Thoreson A comparison of release kinetics and glutamate receptor properties in shaping rod-cone differences in EPSC kinetics in the salamander retina J. Physiol., December 15, 2005; 569(3): 773 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]