J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 564, Number 3, 931-940, May 1, 2005 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.083394
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
564/3/931    most recent
jphysiol.2005.083394v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bostock, H.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bostock, H.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D.

After-effects of near-threshold stimulation in single human motor axons

Hugh Bostock1, Cindy Shin-Yi Lin1, James Howells2, Louise Trevillion2, Stacey Jankelowitz2 and David Burke2

1 Sobell Department of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK and Institute of Clinical Neurosciences
2 The University of Sydney and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Subthreshold electrical stimuli can generate a long-lasting increase in axonal excitability, superficially resembling the phase of superexcitability that follows a conditioning nerve impulse. This phenomenon of ‘subthreshold superexcitability’ has been investigated in single motor axons in six healthy human subjects, by tracking the excitability changes produced by conditioning stimuli of different amplitudes and waveforms. Near-threshold 1 ms stimuli caused a mean decrease in threshold at 5 ms of 22.1 ± 6.0% (mean ±S.D.) if excitation occurred, or 6.9 ± 2.6% if excitation did not occur. The subthreshold superexcitability was maximal at an interval of about 5 ms, and fell to zero at 30 ms. It appeared to be made up of two components: a passive component linearly related to conditioning stimulus amplitude, and a non-linear active component. The active component appeared when conditioning stimuli exceeded 60% of threshold, and accounted for a maximal threshold decrease of 2.6 ± 1.3%. The passive component was directly proportional to stimulus charge, when conditioning stimulus duration was varied between 0.2 and 2 ms, and could be eliminated by using triphasic stimuli with zero net charge. This change in stimulus waveform had little effect on the active component of subthreshold superexcitability or on the ‘suprathreshold superexcitability’ that followed excitation. It is concluded that subthreshold superexcitability in human motor axons is mainly due to the passive electrotonic effects of the stimulating current, but this is supplemented by an active component (about 12% of suprathreshold superexcitability), due to a local response of voltage-dependent sodium channels.

(Received 20 January 2005; accepted after revision 28 February 2005; first published online 3 March 2005)
Corresponding author H. Bostock: Sobell Department, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Email: h.bostock{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 The Physiological Society.