J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 569, Number 2, 655-665, December 1, 2005 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.095281
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
569/2/655    most recent
jphysiol.2005.095281v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ge, W.
Right arrow Articles by Pickar, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ge, W.
Right arrow Articles by Pickar, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Integrative

Vertebral position alters paraspinal muscle spindle responsiveness in the feline spine: effect of positioning duration

Weiqing Ge1, Cynthia R. Long1 and Joel G. Pickar1

1 Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA, USA

Proprioceptive information from paraspinal tissues including muscle contributes to neuromuscular control of the vertebral column. We investigated whether the history of a vertebra's position can affect signalling from paraspinal muscle spindles. Single unit recordings were obtained from muscle spindle afferents in the L6 dorsal roots of 30 Nembutal-anaesthetized cats. Each afferent's receptive field was in the intact muscles of the low back. The L6 vertebra was controlled using a displacement-controlled feedback motor and was held in each of three different conditioning positions for durations of 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 s. Conditioning positions (1.0–2.2 mm dorsal and ventral relative to an intermediate position) were based upon the displacement that loaded the L6 vertebra to 50–60% of the cat's body weight. Following conditioning positions that stretched (hold-long) and shortened (hold-short) the spindle, the vertebra was repositioned identically and muscle spindle discharge at rest and to movement was compared with conditioning at the intermediate position. Hold-short conditioning augmented mean resting spindle discharge by +4.1 to +6.2 impulses s–1; however, the duration of hold-short did not significantly affect this increase (F4,145= 0.49, P= 0.74). The increase was maintained at the beginning of vertebral movement but quickly returned to baseline. Conversely, hold-long conditioning significantly diminished mean resting spindle discharge by –2.0 to –16.1 impulses s–1 (F4,145= 11.23, P < 0.001). The relationship between conditioning duration and the diminished resting discharge could be described by a quadratic (F1,145= 9.28, P= 0.003) revealing that the effects of positioning history were fully developed within 2 s of conditioning. In addition, 2 s or greater of hold-long conditioning significantly diminished spindle discharge to vertebral movement by –5.7 to –10.0 impulses s–1 (F4,145= 11.0, P < 0.001). These effects of vertebral positioning history may be a mechanism whereby spinal biomechanics interacts with the spine's proprioceptive system to produce acute effects on neuromuscular control of the vertebral column.

(Received 26 July 2005; accepted after revision 4 October 2005; first published online 6 October 2005)
Corresponding author J. G. Pickar: Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803, USA. Email: pickar_j{at}palmer.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Durbaba, A. Taylor, P. H. Ellaway, and S. Rawlinson
Classification of longissimus lumborum muscle spindle afferents in the anaesthetized cat
J. Physiol., March 1, 2006; 571(2): 489 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 The Physiological Society.