J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 571, Number 2, 489-498, March 1, 2006 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102731
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
571/2/489    most recent
jphysiol.2005.102731v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durbaba, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlinson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durbaba, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlinson, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Integrative

Integrative

Classification of longissimus lumborum muscle spindle afferents in the anaesthetized cat

R. Durbaba1, A. Taylor1, P. H. Ellaway1 and S. Rawlinson1

1 Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Neuroscience & Mental Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, UK

Recordings have been made from 127 single muscle spindle afferents from the longissimus lumborum muscles of anaesthetized cats. They have been characterized by their responses to passive muscle stretch and the effects of succinylcholine (SCh) and by their sensitivity to vibration. The use of SCh permitted the assessment for each afferent of the influence of bag1 (b1) and bag2 (b2) intrafusal muscle fibres. From this, on the assumption that all afferents were affected by chain (c) fibres, they were classified in four groups: b1b2c (41.9%), b2c (51.4%), b1c (1.3%) and c (5.4%). All the afferents with b1 influence were able to respond one to one to vibration at frequencies above 100 Hz and were considered to belong to primary endings. On the basis of the vibration test, 64% of the b2c type afferents appeared to be primaries and 36% secondaries. Of the units classified as primaries, 41% were designated as b2c and would not therefore be able to respond to dynamic fusimotor activity. The significance of this relatively high proportion of b2c-type spindle primary afferents is discussed in relation to the specialized postural function of the back muscles.

(Received 30 November 2005; accepted after revision 7 January 2006; first published online 12 January 2006)
Corresponding author A. Taylor: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, UK. Email: t.taylor{at}imperial.ac.uk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Durbaba, A. Taylor, P. H. Ellaway, and S. Rawlinson
Spinal projection of spindle afferents of the longissimus lumborum muscles of the cat
J. Physiol., April 15, 2007; 580(2): 659 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 The Physiological Society.