|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEUROSCIENCE |
1 Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences - Center for NeuroScience, University of Amsterdam, 1090 GB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Pyramidal neurons in the subiculum typically display either bursting or regular-spiking behaviour. Although this classification into two neuronal classes is well described, it is unknown how these two classes of neurons contribute to the integration of input to the subiculum. Here, we report that bursting neurons posses a hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) that is two-fold larger (conductance, 5.3 ± 0.5 nS) than in regular-spiking neurons (2.2 ± 0.6 nS), whereas Ih exhibits similar voltage-dependent and kinetic properties in both classes of neurons. Bursting and regular-spiking neurons display similar morphology. The difference in Ih between the two classes of neurons is not responsible for the distinct firing patterns, as neither pharmacological blockade of Ih nor enhancement of Ih using a dynamic clamp affects the qualitative firing patterns. Instead, the difference in Ih between bursting and regular-spiking neurons determines the temporal integration of evoked synaptic input from the CA1 area. In response to stimulation at 50 Hz, bursting neurons, with a large Ih, show
50% less temporal summation than regular-spiking neurons. The amount of temporal summation in both neuronal classes is equal after pharmacological blockade of Ih. A computer simulation model of a subicular neuron with the properties of either a bursting or a regular-spiking neuron confirmed the pivotal role of Ih in temporal integration of synaptic input. These data suggest that in the subicular network, bursting neurons are better suited to discriminate the content of high-frequency input, such as that occurring during gamma oscillations, than regular-spiking neurons.
(Received 22 May 2006;
accepted after revision 28 June 2006;
first published online 29 June 2006)
Corresponding author W. J. Wadman: SILS Center for NeuroScience, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94084, 1090 GB Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Email: wadman{at}science.uva.nl
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Huggenberger, M. Vater, and R. A. Deisz Interlaminar Differences of Intrinsic Properties of Pyramidal Neurons in the Auditory Cortex of Mice Cereb Cortex, September 4, 2008; (2008) bhn143v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Crasto, L. N. Marenco, N. Liu, T. M. Morse, K.-H. Cheung, P. C. Lai, G. Bahl, P. Masiar, H. Y.K. Lam, E. Lim, et al. SenseLab: new developments in disseminating neuroscience information Brief Bioinform, May 17, 2007; (2007) bbm018v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |