J Physiol Visit Proceedings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 577, Number 1, 331-337, November 15, 2006 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.115782
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
577/1/331    most recent
jphysiol.2006.115782v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rittweger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Narici, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rittweger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Narici, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Skeletal Muscle and Exercise

RAPID REPORT

Bone loss from the human distal tibia epiphysis during 24 days of unilateral lower limb suspension

Jörn Rittweger1, Keith Winwood1, Olivier Seynnes1, Maarten de Boer1, Desirée Wilks1, Rosalind Lea1, Michael Rennie1 and Marco Narici1

1 Manchester Metropolitan University, Hassall Road, Alsager ST7 2HL, UK

Bone loss during immobilization is well documented. Currently, the only means of studying this in human beings is bed rest, which is resource intensive and inconvenient for the subjects. Unilateral lower limb suspension (ULLS) has been suggested as an alternative, but has not previously been demonstrated to cause bone loss. The main aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that ULLS would cause bone loss determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). We investigated eight young healthy volunteers (19.1 ± 0.7 years; body mass index, 22.4 ± 2.6 kg m–2), who underwent ULLS for 24 days; their right foot was suspended with a strap attached to the shoulder so the knee angle was 10 deg and they wore a left shoe with a 7.5 cm sole to allow clearance of the right foot and used bilateral crutches to perambulate. Bone scans were obtained by pQCT from the distal epiphyses and from the diaphyses of the tibia in each leg twice before suspension, at days 7, 14 and 21 of the ULLS, and at days 4, 9, 35 and 90 of recovery. After 21 days of ULLS, bone mineral content of the peripheral portion of the epiphysis of the suspended tibia was reduced by 0.89 ± 0.48% (from 280.9 ± 34.5 to 278.4 ± 34.2 mg mm–1, P < 0.001) but no changes were observed in its central portion or in the unsuspended tibia. In the peripheral epiphyseal portion, significant bone loss (by 0.32 ± 0.54%, P = 0.045) occurred as early as day 7 of ULLS. We have demonstrated, for the first time, that in humans bone is lost during ULLS at rates comparable to those seen with bed rest, without alteration in limb fluid volumes thus validating the technique and raising important questions about the mechanisms involved.

(Received 22 June 2006; accepted after revision 29 September 2006; first published online 5 October 2006)
Corresponding author J. Rittweger: Manchester Metropolitan University, IRM, Hassall Road, Alsager ST7 2HL, UK. Email: j.rittweger{at}mmu.ac.uk







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 The Physiological Society.