J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 579, Number 3, 581-601, March 15, 2007 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126698
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
579/3/581    most recent
jphysiol.2006.126698v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, A. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Review articles

SYMPOSIUM REPORT

Useful signals from motor cortex

Andrew B. Schwartz1,2

1 Departments of Neurobiology, Bioengineering, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Neural Engineering Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
2 Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Historically, the motor cortical function has been explained as a funnel to muscle activation. This invokes the idea that motor cortical neurons, or ‘upper motoneurons’, directly cause muscle contraction just like spinal motoneurons. Thus, the motor cortex and muscle activity are inextricably entwined like a puppet master and his marionette. Recently, this concept has been challenged by current experimentation showing that many behavioural aspects of action are represented in motor cortical activity. Although this activity may still be related to muscle activation, the relation between the two is likely to be indirect and complex, whereas the relation between cortical activity and kinematic parameters is simple and robust. These findings show how to extract useful signals that help explain the underlying process that generates behaviour and to harness these signals for potentially therapeutic applications.

(Received 15 December 2006; accepted after revision 15 January 2007; first published online 18 January 2007)
Corresponding author A. B. Schwartz: Department of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, E1440 BST, 200 Lothrope Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2536, USA. Email: abs21{at}pitt.edu


This report was presented at The Journal of Physiology Symposium on Physiology of brain–computer interfaces, Atlanta, GA, USA, 13 October 2006. It was commissioned by the Editorial Board and reflects the views of the author.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. G. Cohen and N. Birbaumer
The physiology of brain-computer interfaces
J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 570 - 570.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.