J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 580, Number 3, 961-975, May 1, 2007 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.124032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
580/3/961    most recent
jphysiol.2006.124032v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brasseur, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brasseur, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, L. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Alimentary

ALIMENTARY

Pharmacological dissection of the human gastro-oesophageal segment into three sphincteric components

James G. Brasseur1, Rhys Ulerich1, Qing Dai2, Dalipkumar K. Patel3, Ahmed M. S. Soliman4 and Larry S. Miller2

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
2 Departments of Gastroenterology
3 Anaesthesiology
4 Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Temple University Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA

Quantifications of gastro-oesophageal anatomy in cadavers have led some to identify the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) with the anatomical gastric sling-clasp fibres at the oesophago-cardiac junction (OCJ). However, in vivo studies have led others to argue for two overlapping components proximally displaced from the OCJ: an extrinsic crural sphincter of skeletal muscle and an intrinsic physiological sphincter of circular smooth-muscle fibres within the abdominal oesophagus. Our aims were to separate and quantify in vivo the skeletal and smooth muscle sphincteric components pharmacologically and clarify the description of the LOS. In two protocols an endoluminal ultrasound-manometry assembly was drawn through the human gastro-oesophageal segment to correlate sphincteric pressure with the anatomic crus. In protocol I, fifteen normal subjects maintained the costal diaphragm at inferior/superior positions by full inspiration/expiration (FI/FE) during pull-throughs. These were repeated after administering atropine to suppress the cholinergic smooth-muscle sphincter. The cholinergic component was reconstructed by subtracting the atropine-resistant pressures from the full pressures, referenced to the anatomic crus. To evaluate the extent to which the cholinergic contribution approximated the full smooth-muscle sphincter, in protocol II seven patients undergoing general anaesthesia for non-oesophageal pathology were administered cisatracurium to paralyse the crus. The smooth-muscle sphincter pressures were measured after lung inflation to approximate FI. The cholinergic smooth-muscle pressure profile in protocol I (FI) matched closely the post-cisatracurium smooth-muscle pressure profile in protocol II, and the atropine-resistant pressure profiles correlated spatially with the crural sling during diaphragmatic displacement. Thus, the atropine-resistant and cholinergic pressure contributions in protocol I approximated the skeletal and smooth muscle sphincteric components. The smooth-muscle pressures had well-defined upper and lower peaks. The upper peak overlapped and displaced rigidly with the crural sling, while the distal peak separated from the crus/upper-peak by 1.1 cm between FI and FE. These results suggest the existence of separate upper and lower intrinsic smooth-muscle components. The ‘upper LOS’ overlaps and displaces with the crural sling consistent with a physiological LOS. The distal smooth-muscle pressure peak defines a ‘lower LOS’ that likely reflects the gastric sling/clasp muscle fibres at the OCJ. The distinct physiology of these three components may underlie aspects of normal sphincteric function, and complexity of sphincter dysfunction.

(Received 4 November 2006; accepted after revision 25 January 2007; first published online 8 February 2007)
Corresponding author J. G. Brasseur: Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Bioengineering and Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, 205 Reber Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Email: brasseur{at}psu.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
S. K. Ghosh, P. J. Kahrilas, and J. G. Brasseur
Liquid in the gastroesophageal segment promotes reflux, but compliance does not: a mathematical modeling study
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): G920 - G933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
M R Fox and A J Bredenoord
Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice
Gut, March 1, 2008; 57(3): 405 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.