J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 583, Number 2, 797-809, September 1, 2007 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137422
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
583/2/797    most recent
jphysiol.2007.137422v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pellinger, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Halliwill, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pellinger, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Halliwill, J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Integrative

INTEGRATIVE

Effect of propranolol on sympathetically mediated leg vasoconstriction in humans

Thomas K. Pellinger1 and John R. Halliwill1

1 Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1240, USA

Sympatho-excitatory manoeuvres are used to study vascular responsiveness in humans, but it is unclear if circulating adrenaline attenuates peripheral vasoconstriction during these manoeuvres. We hypothesized that vasoconstrictor responses to three manoeuvres (neck pressure, unilateral thigh-cuff release and isometric handgrip) would be greater after the administration of the β-adrenergic blocker propranolol. Seven men and six women underwent these manoeuvres while beat-by-beat arterial pressure (finger photoplethysmography), femoral mean blood velocity (Doppler ultrasound) and femoral artery diameter (edge-detection software) were measured. Femoral vascular conductance was calculated as flow/pressure. Propranolol had no effect on baseline femoral vascular conductance (P > 0.05). As a result of neck pressure, femoral vascular conductance was reduced 23.9 ± 3.5% before vs. 33.2 ± 3.2% after infusion of propranolol (P = 0.033). After thigh-cuff release, femoral vascular conductance declined 50.2 ± 5.8% before vs. 57.4 ± 9.6% after propranolol infusion (P = 0.496). During handgrip, femoral vascular conductance was reduced 47.2 ± 9.6% before vs. 55.2 ± 9.2% after propranolol administration (P = 0.447). After handgrip, women had a greater rise in conductance than men (women: 153 ± 16.2%; men: 36.4 ± 10.6%; P < 0.001), which was blunted by 54.8% by propranolol (P < 0.001 vs. control), but unaffected by propranolol in men (P = 0.355 vs. control). The finding that β-adrenergic receptor-mediated vasodilatation minimally affects vascular responses to these sympatho-excitatory manoeuvres reinforces their utility in the investigation of sympathetic vascular regulation in humans. Interestingly, post-handgrip hyperaemia is greater in women than men and is, in part, β-adrenergic receptor mediated.

(Received 25 May 2007; accepted after revision 4 July 2007; first published online 12 July 2007)
Corresponding author J. R. Halliwill: 122 Esslinger Hall, 1240 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1240, USA. Email: halliwil{at}uoregon.edu







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.