J Physiol Sign Up for eTOC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 584, Number 2, 651-659, October 15, 2007 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134205
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
584/2/651    most recent
jphysiol.2007.134205v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butler, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, N. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Integrative
Right arrowRelated Article

INTEGRATIVE

The nature of corticospinal paths driving human motoneurones during voluntary contractions

Jane E. Butler2, Thomas S. Larsen1, Simon C. Gandevia2 and Nicolas T. Petersen1

1 Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, and Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute and University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia 2031

The properties of the human motor cortex can be studied non-invasively using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Stimulation at high intensity excites corticospinal cells with fast conducting axons that make direct connections to motoneurones of human upper limb muscles, while low-intensity stimulation can suppress ongoing EMG. To assess whether these cells are used in normal voluntary contractions, we used TMS at very low intensities to suppress the firing of single motor units in biceps brachii (n = 14) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI, n = 6). Their discharge was recorded with intramuscular electrodes and cortical stimulation was delivered at multiple intensities at appropriate times during sustained voluntary firing at ~10 Hz. For biceps, high-intensity stimulation produced facilitation at 17.1 ± 2.1 ms (lasting 2.4 ± 0.9 ms), while low-intensity stimulation (below motor threshold) produced suppression (without facilitation) at 20.2 ± 2.1 ms (lasting 7.6 ± 2.2 ms). For FDI, high-intensity stimulation produced facilitation at 23.3 ± 1.2 ms (lasting 1.8 ± 0.4 ms), with suppression produced by low-intensity stimulation at 25.2 ± 2.6 ms (lasting 7.5 ± 2.6 ms). The difference between the onsets of facilitation and suppression was short: 3.1 ± 1.2 ms for biceps and 2.0 ± 1.5 ms for FDI. This latency difference is much less than that previously reported using surface EMG recordings (~10 ms). These data suggest that low-intensity cortical stimulation inhibits ongoing activity in fast-conducting corticospinal axons through an oligosynaptic (possibly disynaptic) path, and that this activity is normally contributing to drive the motoneurones during voluntary contractions.

(Received 10 April 2007; accepted after revision 9 August 2007; first published online 16 August 2007)
Corresponding author N. Petersen: Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. Email: npetersen{at}ifi.ku.dk


Related Article

Corticospinal involvement in volitional contractions
John C. Rothwell
J. Physiol. 2007 584: 363. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. C. Rothwell
Corticospinal involvement in volitional contractions
J. Physiol., October 15, 2007; 584(2): 363 - 363.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.