| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTEGRATIVE |
1 Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager ST7 2HL, UK
2
Applied Physiology Research Group, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
During human standing, tonic ankle extensor torque is required to support the centre of mass (CoM) forward of the ankles, and dynamic torque modulation is required to maintain unstable balance. Passive mechanisms contribute to both but the extent is controversial. Some groups have revealed a substantial intrinsic stiffness (65–90%) normalized to load stiffness, ‘mgh’. Others regard their methodology as unsuitable for the low-frequency conditions of quiet standing and believe the passive contribution to be small (10–15%). Here we applied low-frequency ankle rotations to upright subjects who were supported at the waist allowing the leg muscles to be passive and we report normalized stiffness. The passive calf muscles provided: (i) an extensor torque capable of sustaining unstable balance without tonic activity at a mean CoM–ankle angle of 1.6 deg, (ii) a long range stiffness of 13 ± 2% and (iii) a short range (< 0.2 deg) stiffness of 67 ± 8%. Chordal ankle stiffness, derived from the torque versus angle relationship for 7 deg rotations, shows a non-linear decrease (stiffness 
rotation–0.33±0.04) from 101 ± 9% to 19 ± 5% for rotations of 0.03–7 deg, respectively. Thus, passive stiffness is well adapted for the continuum of postural and movement activity and has a substantial postural role eliminating the need for continuous muscle activity and increasing the unstable time constant of the human inverted pendulum. Ignoring the non-linear dependence of passive stiffness on sway size could lead to serious misinterpretation of experiments using perturbations and sensory manipulations such as eye closure, sway referencing and altered support surfaces.
(Received 3 July 2007;
accepted after revision 22 August 2007;
first published online 6 September 2007)
Corresponding author I. Loram: Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager ST7 2HL, UK. Email: i.loram{at}mmu.ac.uk
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Z. Z. Chew, S. C. Gandevia, and R. C. Fitzpatrick Postural control at the human wrist J. Physiol., March 1, 2008; 586(5): 1265 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L. Sturnieks, J. R. Wright, and R. C. Fitzpatrick Detection of simultaneous movement at two human arm joints J. Physiol., December 15, 2007; 585(3): 833 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. D. Loram, C. N. Maganaris, and M. Lakie The passive, human calf muscles in relation to standing: the short range stiffness lies in the contractile component J. Physiol., October 15, 2007; 584(2): 677 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
