J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 586, Number 14, 3385-3404, July 15, 2008 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.153288
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
586/14/3385    most recent
jphysiol.2008.153288v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rothwell, J. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ortu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rothwell, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroscience

NEUROSCIENCE

Intracortical modulation of cortical-bulbar responses for the masseter muscle

Enzo Ortu1,2, Franca Deriu2, Antonio Suppa1,3, Elena Giaconi2, Eusebio Tolu2 and John C. Rothwell1

1 Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Human Physiology and Bioengineering, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
3 Department of Neurological Sciences and Neuromed Institute, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Rome, Italy

Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were evaluated in the masseter muscles of 12 subjects and the cortical silent period (SP) in nine subjects. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from contralateral (cMM) and ipsilateral (iMM) masseters, activated at 10% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were 2 and 3 ms for SICI, 10 and 15 ms for ICF. TMS of the left masseteric cortex induced MEPs that were larger in the cMM than the iMM; stimulation of right masseteric cortex produced a similar asymmetry in response amplitude. SICI was only observed using a CS intensity of 70% AMT and was equal in both cMM and iMM. SICI was stronger at higher TS intensities, was abolished by muscle activation greater than 10% MVC, and was unaffected by coil orientation changes. Control experiments confirmed that SICI was not contaminated by any inhibitory peripheral reflexes. However, ICF could not be obtained because it was masked by bilateral reflex depression of masseter EMG caused by auditory input from the coil discharge. The SP was bilateral and symmetric; its duration ranged from 35 to 70 ms depending on TS intensity and coil orientation. We conclude that SICI is present in the cortical representation of masseter muscles. The similarity of SICI in cMM and iMM suggests either that a single pool of inhibitory interneurons controls ipsi- and contralateral corticotrigeminal projections or that inhibition is directed to bilaterally projecting corticotrigeminal fibres. Finally, the corticotrigeminal projection seems to be weakly influenced by inhibitory interneurons mediating the cortical SP.

(Received 28 February 2008; accepted after revision 15 May 2008; first published online 22 May 2008)
Corresponding author F. Deriu: University of Sassari, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Human Physiology and Bioengineering, Viale San Pietro 43/b, 07100 – Sassari, Italy. Email: deriuf{at}uniss.it







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 The Physiological Society.