J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 517, Number 2, 353-368, June 1, 1999
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerster, U.
Right arrow Articles by Flucher, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerster, U.
Right arrow Articles by Flucher, B. E.
The Journal of Physiology (1999), 517.2, pp. 353-368
© Copyright 1999 The Physiological Society

Current modulation and membrane targeting of the calcium channel alpha1C subunit are independent functions of the beta subunit

Uli Gerster, Birgit Neuhuber, Klaus Groschner *, Jörg Striessnig and Bernhard E. Flucher

Department of Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck and * Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria

MS 8939 Received 6 November 1998; accepted after revision 24 February 1999.
  ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. The beta subunits of voltage-sensitive calcium channels facilitate the incorporation of channels into the plasma membrane and modulate calcium currents. In order to determine whether these two effects of the beta subunit are interdependent or independent of each other we studied plasma membrane incorporation of the channel subunits with green fluorescent protein and immunofluorescence labelling, and current modulation with whole-cell and single-channel patch-clamp recordings in transiently transfected human embryonic kidney tsA201 cells.

  2. Coexpression of rabbit cardiac muscle alpha1C with rabbit skeletal muscle beta1a, rabbit heart/brain beta2a or rat brain beta3 subunits resulted in the colocalization of alpha1C with beta and in a marked translocation of the channel complexes into the plasma membrane. In parallel, the whole-cell current density and single-channel open probability were increased. Furthermore, the beta2a isoform specifically altered the voltage dependence of current activation and the inactivation kinetics.

  3. A single amino acid substitution in the beta subunit interaction domain of alpha1C (alpha1CY467S) disrupted the colocalization and plasma membrane targeting of both subunits without affecting the beta subunit-induced modulation of whole-cell currents and single-channel properties.

  4. These results show that the modulation of calcium currents by beta subunits can be explained by beta subunit-induced changes of single-channel properties, but the formation of stable alpha1C-beta complexes and their increased incorporation into the plasma membrane appear not to be necessary for functional modulation.
  INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Voltage-sensitive calcium channels are multimeric protein complexes formed by the alpha1 subunit and the auxiliary subunits alpha2delta, beta and gamma (Leung et al. 1987; Takahashi et al. 1987; Vaghy et al. 1987). The alpha1 subunit by itself shows the characteristic properties of a voltage-gated ion channel, i.e. voltage sensing, ion permeation and drug binding. The physiological roles of the auxiliary subunits are currently the subject of intensive investigations. The beta subunit modulates calcium currents by increasing the current density and by changing the current kinetics when coexpressed in heterologous expression systems (Lacerda et al. 1991; Varadi et al. 1991; Lory et al. 1992). Furthermore, it has been suggested that the beta subunit is involved in the targeting of the alpha1 subunit to the plasma membrane (Chien et al. 1995; Gregg et al. 1996). Both the alpha1 and beta subunits exist in multiple tissue-specific isoforms, which differ from one another in their primary structure and in their functional properties (Birnbaumer et al. 1994; Isom et al. 1994). The skeletal muscle alpha1S isoform, for example, shows slow activation and inactivation kinetics compared with the other alpha1 isoforms. Also, whereas alpha1C expressed in heterologous expression systems exhibits currents even in the absence of auxiliary subunits (Perez-Garcia et al. 1995), expression of alpha1S in heterologous systems rarely gives rise to measurable calcium currents (Johnson et al. 1997). The beta subunit isoforms differ in their current modulation (Hullin et al. 1992; Sather et al. 1993; Parent et al. 1997) and, when expressed alone, in their subcellular distribution (Chien et al. 1995, 1996; Brice et al. 1997). For example, beta2a drastically reduced the speed of inactivation when coexpressed with the neuronal alpha1E subunit in oocytes (Parent et al. 1997), whereas other beta subunit isoforms showed only minor effects on current inactivation. Analogously, beta2a differs from most other beta isoforms in that it was localized in the plasma membrane when expressed without an alpha1 subunit in a heterologous expression system (Chien et al. 1995), whereas beta1a, beta3 and beta4 showed a cytoplasmic localization (Brice et al. 1997; Neuhuber et al. 1998b).

A conserved beta subunit binding motif has been identified in the cytoplasmic loop between repeats I and II of alpha1S, alpha1A, alpha1B and alpha1C (Pragnell et al. 1994). Point mutations within this binding motif perturbed alpha1-beta binding and affected calcium current properties when the neuronal alpha1A isoform was coexpressed with beta1b in oocytes. A point mutation (Y366S) within the beta subunit binding motif in the I-II linker of the skeletal muscle alpha1S resulted in the expected loss of alpha1S-beta1a binding, but the probability that tsA201 human embryonic kidney cells cotransfected with alpha1SY366S and beta1a exhibited calcium currents was still increased by the beta1a subunit (Neuhuber et al. 1998b). This indicates that stable binding of beta1a to the known motif in the I-II linker of alpha1S is not necessary for the beta subunit to increase the frequency of current expression. Thus, association of beta with this interaction domain in the cytoplasmic I-II linker plays an important role in beta subunit-dependent modulation of calcium currents, but other mechanisms for alpha1-beta interaction may exist. De Waard et al. (1994, 1996) identified a conserved 30 amino acid domain in the beta subunit that is complementary to the binding site in the I-II linker on alpha1A and is involved in the interaction with this subunit. Mutations within this domain of beta perturbed binding to alpha1A and affected modulation of calcium current properties. However, this domain in the beta subunit cannot account for all observed modulatory effects of alpha1A-beta interactions, since certain truncated beta subunits were only affected in their modulation of inactivation kinetics, not in current stimulation. Therefore, a region of the beta subunit other than that interacting with the I-II linker of alpha1 may be involved in the modulation of alpha1A (De Waard et al. 1994). Moreover, using chimeras of different beta isoforms Olcese et al. (1994) and Qin et al. (1996) have found that regulation of activation and inactivation of alpha1E channels are two separable functions of the beta subunit, suggesting the existence of two separate interaction domains on each of the subunits. Indeed, Tareilus et al. (1997) identified a second beta subunit binding domain within the last 277 amino acids of the C-terminus of alpha1E, and Walker et al. (1998) identified a low affinity binding site in the carboxy-terminal region of alpha1A that accounts for beta4-induced modulation of current inactivation.

Despite this progress in understanding the function of the calcium channel beta subunit the mechanism of current modulation by beta remains largely unresolved. For example, it is still controversial whether increased insertion of channels into the plasma membrane and modulation of current properties are two independent functions of the beta subunit or whether the latter is a direct result of the former. Also, we do not know whether alpha1 and beta form a stable complex in which beta serves as a necessary cofactor or mediator of modulatory signals, or whether association and dissociation of the beta subunit in itself is the modulatory mechanism. To address these questions we studied the interactions of three different beta subunit isoforms with alpha1C and an alpha1C mutant with a single amino acid substitution in the beta subunit interaction domain of the I-II linker (alpha1CY467S) using a combination of structural and functional techniques. This approach allowed us to distinguish beta isoform-specific effects from common effects of alpha1C-beta interactions and to demonstrate that increased membrane incorporation and modulation of channel properties are two independent effects of beta subunits. Single-channel analysis showed that changes in the open probability are sufficiently large to explain the increase in whole-cell current density observed upon coexpression of the beta subunit. Further, the comparison of beta subunit effects on wild-type and mutant alpha1C shows that this increase in current density occurs even without the formation of stable alpha1C-beta complexes or their increased incorporation into the plasma membrane.

  METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cell lines

tsA201 cells, a HEK cell subclone stably transfected with the SV40 large T-antigen, were plated and allowed to proliferate in F12 medium (Gibco BRL, Vienna, Austria) containing 10 % fetal bovine serum. Cells were grown to 80 % confluency before passaging. For structural analysis (green fluorescent protein (GFP) and immunocytochemistry), cells were plated at dilutions of about 1 : 10 onto poly-L-lysine-coated 13 mm round coverslips and transfected on the following day (see below) when cells reached 30 % confluency. For patch-clamp analysis cells were plated on 35 mm culture dishes at a dilution of 1 : 10. After transfection at about 50 % confluency, cells were replated onto poly-L-lysine-coated 25 mm round coverslips at dilutions between 1 : 5 and 1 : 10 to get isolated cells for patch-clamp recordings on the following day.

Transfection

Transfections were carried out with a liposomal transfection reagent (DOTAP, Boehringer Mannheim) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The total amount of DNA used per 35 mm culture dish was 10 µg, 5-8 µg of which was specific DNA (expression plasmids encoding alpha1C constructs, beta subunit and GFP), with the rest made up with inert DNA (pUC18; Norrander et al. 1985). In co-transfection experiments two or more expression plasmids were combined at equimolar concentrations. This resulted in coexpression of beta with any alpha1C construct in approximately 70 % of beta subunit-transfected cells. The liposome-DNA mixture was diluted in 1·5 ml F12 medium and then added to the culture. On the following day the cells were processed for immunocytochemistry or replated for patch-clamp analysis.

Expression plasmids

Details of the expression plasmids are given in Table 1. The coding sequence of rabbit cardiac muscle alpha1C DNA (Mikami et al. 1989) with an alternative exon in IVS3 (Koch et al. 1990) was inserted into the expression plasmid pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) via HindIII and NotIdigestion. The tyrosine to serine substitution in position 467 in alpha1C (alpha1CY467S) was introduced by site-directed mutagenesis of alpha1C-pcDNA3 using the splicing by overlap extension technique. The following mutagenic sense primer was used:

5' AAGCAGCAGCTAGAAGAGGACCTCAAAGGCTCCCTGGACGGAT 3'.

To facilitate the identification of positive clones, a PvuII site (nucleotide 1376) was eliminated in the mutagenic primers by silent mutation. The mutated alpha1C fragment was inserted into alpha1C-pcDNA3 after digestion with BamHI (nucleotide 1263) and EcoRI (nucleotide 2213). The mutation was verified by sequence analysis. In addition, a GFP-alpha1C fusion protein (Grabner et al. 1998) was used for double fluorescence labelling. The subcellular distribution and the electrophysiological properties of GFP-alpha1C and alpha1C were identical.

Table 1. Expression plasmids

Name Vector Insert Reference
alpha1C pcDNA3 Rabbit cardiac muscle alpha1 Mikami et al. 1989; Koch et al. 1990
GFP-alpha1C pcDNA3 GFP-alpha1C fusion protein Grabner et al. 1998
alpha1CY467S pcDNA3 Cardiac muscle alpha1C Y to S substitution Present study
beta1a pcDNA3 Rabbit skeletal muscle beta Ruth et al. 1989
beta1a-GFP pcDNA3 beta1a-GFP fusion protein Neuhuber et al. 1998b
beta2a pCMV6 Rabbit heart/brain beta Perez-Reyes et al. 1992
beta3 pCMV6 Rat brain beta Castellano et al. 1993
GFP (S65T) pRK5 Green fluorescent protein Heim et al. 1995
pUC18 pUC18 - Norrander et al. 1985

GFP and immunofluorescence labelling

Paraformaldehyde-fixed cultures were immuno-stained as previously described (Flucher et al. 1993). For double labelling with GFP, Texas Red-conjugated antibodies (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA, USA) were used to exclude bleed-through between the red and the green channels. Working dilutions and the sources of primary antibodies are listed in Table 2. Samples were evaluated on a Zeiss Axiovert microscope with epifluorescence and phase-contrast optics and documented on 35 mm high speed black and white film. Controls, such as the omission of primary antibodies and incubation with inappropriate antibodies, were routinely performed. Localization of alpha1C and GFP-alpha1C, or beta1a and beta1a-GFP gave the same results with respect to distribution patterns in all examined conditions.

Table 2. Antibodies

Specificity Code Type Dilution Reference
DHP-receptor, alpha1C CNC Affinity purified, rabbit 1 : 1500 Safayhi et al. 1997
DHP-receptor, beta betacom Affinity purified, rabbit 1 : 1200 Pichler et al. 1997; Neuhuber et al. 1998b

Patch-clamp recording

Whole-cell and single-channel recordings were performed as described by Hamill et al. (1981). Cultures grown on 25 mm round coverslips were mounted in a recording chamber and viewed with a × 16 phase-contrast multi-immersion lens on a Zeiss Axiovert microscope. Fluorescent cells (indicating successful transfection with beta1a-GFP or GFP) were selected for recording. An Axopatch 200A patch-clamp amplifier controlled by the software pCLAMP 6.0 (Axon Instruments) was used for all recordings.

Whole-cell recordings

The bath solution contained (mM): 40 BaCl2, 100 TEA-Cl and 10 Hepes (adjusted to pH 7·4 using TEA-OH). Patch pipettes, pulled from borosilicate glass and fire polished, were filled with (mM): 130 caesium aspartate, 10 Hepes, 2 Mg-ATP, 2 Cs-EGTA and 0·5 MgCl2 (adjusted to pH 7·4 with CsOH). Resistances of the patch pipettes were between 4 and 7 MOmega. Capacitative currents were compensated using built-in analog circuits (series resistance error was corrected for 80 %), and the value for the whole-cell capacity was determined from this adjustment of the amplifier and used to calculate the current density. Leak resistance in the cell-attached mode was normally larger than 8 GOmega. Current data were low-pass Bessel filtered at 2 kHz and sampled at 1 kHz with an IBM compatible PC. In the electrophysiological experiments alpha1C was used in place of GFP-alpha1C, which was primarily used in the structural analysis. In control experiments we did not find any difference between calcium currents from cells transfected with GFP-alpha1C or alpha1C. I-V curves, obtained by plotting the peak current density, i, against the test potential, V, were fitted by a modified Boltzmann function:

eq01

where g is the specific conductance (in pA (pF mV)-1), Vrev is the reversial potential (in mV), V50 is the potential of half-maximal activation (in mV), and k is the slope factor (in mV) which determines the steepness of the voltage dependence of activation.

Single-channel recordings

The bath solution contained (mM): 110 potassium aspartate, 20 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 20 Hepes and 2 EGTA (adjusted to pH 7·4 with KOH). Patch pipettes, pulled from borosilicate glass, fire polished and coated with Sigmacote (Sigma), were filled with (mM): 80 BaCl2, 30 TEA-Cl, 15 Hepes and 1 EDTA (adjusted to pH 7·4 with TEA-OH) and had resistances between 5 and 15 MOmega. If not otherwise specified in the text the following procedures for data acquisition and analysis were used. Test pulses of 200 ms duration from -70 to 0 mV were applied at 3 s intervals. Data were low-pass Bessel filtered at 2 kHz, sampled at 10 kHz, and analysed with Fetchan 6.0 (Axon Instruments) after digital Gaussian filtering at 1·5 kHz. The event detection threshold was 0·5 pA. With this event detection threshold events arising from endogenous low voltage-activated small conductance calcium channels, which we sometimes observed in non-transfected tsA201 cells, were excluded from the analysis. This also applies for the low threshold small conductance channels described by Meir & Dolphin (1998) in COS7 cells transfected with alpha1 subunits. Furthermore, events with a duration of 0·2 ms or shorter were excluded from the analysis. The open probability for a patch, i.e. NPo where N is the number of channels in the patch and Po is the single-channel open probability, was calculated by dividing the sum of the duration of all events, which was obtained from the event list provided by Fetchan 6.0, by the total observation time. This simplified method could be applied since, due to the rare occurrence and short duration of channel openings under our experimental conditions, higher conductance levels were almost never observed. In order to estimate the number of channels in each patch, N, from these NPo values we used two different approaches: (1) a mathematical procedure, which is based on theoretical considerations about the distribution of NPo values for a set of patches with different unknown N values, and (2) an experimental approach, in which the highest conductance level in each patch observed after the addition of the calcium channel agonist (±)-Bay K 8644 to the bath solution was taken as an estimate for the number of channels in the patch (for details, see Results).

  RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Differential localization of individually expressed alpha1C and beta subunits

tsA201 cells were transiently transfected with GFP-alpha1C, beta1a-GFP, beta2a or beta3 and the subunit localization was determined with either GFP fluorescence or immunofluorescence (Fig. 1). In 79 % of 543 examined cells (Table 3) alpha1C was localized in a dense network of a tubular membrane compartment that extended throughout the entire cytoplasm. The tubular/reticular network was very dense in the perinuclear region but could be resolved in thin regions of the cells (Fig. 1a). Occasionally the nuclear envelope was also labelled. Based on these structural characteristics the alpha1C-containing compartment was identified as the endoplasmic reticulum. In 15 % of the cells alpha1C was also localized in clusters in the plasma membrane (not shown). There were no differences in the distribution patterns between the wild-type alpha1C and the mutant alpha1CY467S. The distribution patterns of the beta subunits differed from that of alpha1C and were different among themselves. When expressed alone, beta1a and beta3 were both distributed diffusely throughout the cytoplasm of tsA201 cells (Table 4; Fig. 1d and o). In contrast, beta2a showed a continuous plasma membrane stain and the cytoplasm was essentially free of immunolabel (Table 4; Fig. 1i).

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 1. Changes in subcellular distribution patterns of calcium channel beta1a, beta2a and beta3 subunits coexpressed with alpha1C or alpha1CY467S

    tsA201 cells were transfected with alpha1C (wild-type or mutant) and beta isoforms alone or in different subunit combinations and the subunits were localized with immunofluorescence or GFP labelling. Left column: when expressed alone alpha1C (a) is localized in a tubular network - presumably the endoplasmic reticulum - that is very dense in the perinuclear region (saturated fluorescence) but can be resolved in the cell periphery (arrows); beta1a (d) and beta3 (o) are diffusely localized in the cytoplasm; and beta2a is localized in the plasma membrane (i; arrowhead). Centre column: when wild-type alpha1C and beta1a are coexpressed, the two colocalize in clusters in the plasma membrane (b and e; examples indicated by arrows); alpha1C and beta2a (g and j) are colocalized throughout the plasma membrane, diffusely (arrowheads) and in clusters (arrows); and alpha1C and beta3 are either colocalized in clusters (l and p; arrows) or beta3 remains diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm (m and q). The alpha1C + beta pairs were double labelled by using GFP-alpha1C (b, g, l and m) and anti-betacom (e, j, p and q). Right column: when coexpressed with the mutant alpha1CY467S, translocation and colocalization fail and all subunits remain in the same compartments as when expressed individually; alpha1CY467S in the endoplasmic reticulum (c, h and n; arrows); beta1a (f) and beta3 (r) in the cytoplasm; and beta2a in the plasma membrane (k; arrowhead). N, nucleus; scale bar, 20 µm.

Table 3. Subcellular distribution of the calcium channel alpha1C subunits expressed alone or with beta subunit isoforms

  alpha1C alpha1CY467S
ER PM ER PM
Without beta 79 15 87 7
beta1a 14 83 87 7
beta2a 32 64 93 0
beta3 49 47 88 6
Numbers give percentage of cells in each category (n = 500-800 cells for each condition). Balance to 100 % represents cells in which localization could not be unambiguously identified as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or plasma membrane (PM).

Table 4. Subcellular distribution of the calcium channel beta subunits expressed alone or with alpha1C

  Without alpha1C alpha1C alpha1CY467S
Cytoplasm PM Cytoplasm ER * PM Cytoplasm PM
beta1a 98 0 12 19 69 96 0
beta2a 0 94 0 0 99 0 98
beta3 99 0 44 28 28 98 0
Numbers give percentage of cells in each category (n = 400-900 cells for each condition). Balance to 100 % represents cells in which localization could not be unambiguously identified as cytoplasm, ER or PM. * ER distribution of beta subunits was only observed with alpha1C and is therefore not included in the other conditions.

Colocalization of coexpressed alpha1C and beta subunits in the plasma membrane

alpha1C was coexpressed with beta1a, beta2a or beta3 in tsA201 cells and the subcellular distribution of both subunits was determined with GFP fluorescence or immunofluorescence. Upon coexpression with any of the beta subunits the localization of alpha1C changed significantly from that observed when alpha1C was expressed alone. In all cases the number of cells with an endoplasmic reticulum localization of alpha1C was strongly reduced, whereas the number of cells with a plasma membrane localization was strongly increased compared with cells in which alpha1C was expressed alone (Table 3). In parallel, beta1a and beta3 were no longer found in the cytoplasm but were localized in clusters in the plasma membrane (Fig. 1e and p) and to some extent in the endoplasmic reticulum (Table 4). In both locations alpha1C and the beta subunits were colocalized (Fig. 1b, e, l and p). The degree to which alpha1C and beta were translocated to the plasma membrane was considerably higher for beta1a than for beta3. Fewer than half of the cells coexpressing alpha1C and beta3 showed a colocalization of the two subunits in plasma membrane clusters, and in the rest of the cells alpha1C and beta3 remained in the endoplasmic reticulum and the cytoplasm, respectively (Fig. 1l, m, p and q; Tables 3 and 4). In contrast to the cytoplasmic beta1a and beta3 subunits, the plasma membrane-associated beta2a subunit showed little change in its distribution pattern when coexpressed with alpha1C. beta2a remained evenly distributed throughout the plasma membrane, where it now was colocalized with alpha1C (Fig. 1g and j). In addition to the even plasma membrane distribution, the two subunits were frequently colocalized in plasma membrane clusters. The observed changes in the subcellular distribution of the alpha1C and beta subunits upon coexpression indicate that all three examined beta subunit isoforms bind to alpha1C and that the alpha1C-beta complexes become inserted into the plasma membrane.

Translocation and colocalization of alpha1C and beta subunits fails when the beta subunit binding domain in the cytoplasmic I-II linker of alpha1C is mutated

To investigate the mechanism of the direct alpha1C-beta interactions that underlie the observed changes in the subcellular distribution of the channel subunits, we replaced tyrosine in position 467 of the beta subunit interaction domain of alpha1C with serine. The corresponding point mutations in alpha1A and alpha1S have been shown to disrupt beta1b and beta1a binding, respectively (Pragnell et al. 1994; Neuhuber et al. 1998b). Indeed, when alpha1CY467S was coexpressed with any one of the beta subunit isoforms, alpha1CY467S and all beta subunits remained localized in the same subcellular compartment as when expressed alone (Fig. 1). The subunits were not colocalized with one another in the plasma membrane or anywhere else in the cells and no increased expression of alpha1CY467S clusters occurred. This shows that the translocation of the subunits to the plasma membrane that was observed with GFP fluorescence and immunofluorescence when any one of the beta subunits was coexpressed with wild-type alpha1C depends on an intact beta subunit interaction domain in the cytoplasmic I-II linker of alpha1C.

beta subunits modulate current activation in wild-type and mutant alpha1C channels

To investigate whether the observed structural interactions between alpha1C and the beta subunits are reflected in a modulation of calcium current properties, we performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. tsA201 cells were transfected with alpha1C or alpha1CY467S with or without one of the beta subunit isoforms, plus a plasmid encoding GFP as an expression marker. In the case of beta1a, the fusion protein beta1a-GFP was used instead of a combination of the two separate plasmids. The fraction of GFP-expressing cells in which high voltage-activated calcium currents could be recorded was 50 % for cells transfected with alpha1C alone and 42 % for cells transfected with alpha1CY467S alone. The percentage of cells exhibiting high voltage-activated calcium currents was about equal or higher when alpha1C or alpha1CY467S was coexpressed with a beta subunit.

To measure the voltage dependence of activation, 400 ms voltage steps were applied from a holding potential of -80 mV to various test potentials between -40 and +80 mV (Fig. 2). I-V curves were obtained from these measurements by plotting the peak current density against the test potential (Fig. 3A). Coexpression with any one of the beta subunits increased the peak current density severalfold. When alpha1C or alpha1CY467S was expressed alone the largest peak current was observed at a test potential of +40 mV. Upon coexpression with beta2a the test potential at which the largest current was observed shifted to +30 mV. The Y467S point mutation had no effect on the intrinsic current properties of alpha1C or on the characteristic modulation by the beta subunit isoforms. The increase in current density observed with all beta subunit isoforms and the shift in the peak of the I-V curve observed with beta2a were the same with alpha1C and alpha1CY467S. I-V curves were further analysed by fitting them with a modified Boltzmann function (see Methods; Fig. 3B). This analysis revealed that all beta subunits increased the specific conductance, g, and that the strongest shift occurred with beta1a. The potential of half-maximal activation, V50, and the slope factor, k, were both decreased by coexpression of the beta subunits, with beta2a showing the strongest effect (with P < 0·001, t test). The value of k was significantly decreased with P < 0·05 by all beta subunits. The reversal potential, Vrev, was not significantly altered by coexpression of the beta subunits. Interestingly, none of these parameters showed a significant difference between alpha1C and alpha1CY467S in any of the examined subunit combinations, suggesting that despite the deficiency in complex formation alpha1CY467S was still sensitive to modulation by beta subunits.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 2. Comparison of the time course of current traces for alpha1C and alpha1CY467S expressed without or with beta1a, beta2a or beta3 in tsA201 cells

    The membrane potential was stepped for 400 ms from a holding potential of -80 mV to 0, +20 or +40 mV (upper, middle and lower traces, respectively). The magnitude of currents varied greatly between individual cells (see also error bars in Fig. 3A and B). Current inactivation was slowed down on coexpression of alpha1C or alpha1CY467S with beta2a. There was no apparent difference between currents recorded from alpha1C- or alpha1CY467S-transfected cells.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 3. Voltage dependence of current activation for wild-type and mutant alpha1C expressed with and without beta subunits

    A, I-V curves obtained by plotting the peak current density from voltage step measurements as shown in Fig. 2 against the test potential. Coexpression of alpha1C (fullcir) and alpha1CY467S (cir) with any one of the beta subunits increased the current amplitude severalfold (means and S.E.M.). B, I-V curves for each individual recording were fitted by a modified Boltzmann function (see Methods) and the obtained parameters were subsequently averaged. squ, alpha1C; sp24, alpha1CY467S; error bars are S.E.M., and the number of cells recorded is shown. The specific conductance, g, was increased on beta subunit coexpression whereas V50 and k were decreased by beta subunit coexpression. The decrease in k on coexpression with each of the beta subunits compared with alpha1C or alpha1CY467S expression alone was significant with P < 0·05. The reversal potential, Vrev, was not significantly altered by the beta subunits.

Current kinetics are modulated by the beta subunits

As a measure of the activation kinetics the time from the onset of the voltage step to 70 % of the total rise in current amplitude, tau70 %, was determined (Fig. 4A). Whereas beta3 had no effect, beta1a decreased the speed of activation and beta2a slightly accelerated activation. The activation kinetics of alpha1CY467S were always somewhat faster than those of wild-type alpha1C, regardless of whether they were expressed alone or together with a beta subunit. This suggests that tyrosine in position 467 of alpha1C is involved in determining the channel activation kinetics. The acceleration of activation kinetics by the mutation was statistically significant (P < 0·05) for coexpression with beta1a and beta2a, but not for beta3 and expression of alpha1C alone.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 4. Calcium current kinetics in tsA201 cells transfected with alpha1C or alpha1CY467S with and without beta subunits

    squ, alpha1C; , alpha1CY467S. A, activation kinetics of calcium currents are expressed as the time from the onset of a voltage step to +40 mV (holding potential, -80 mV) to 70 % of the total rise in current amplitude, tau70 %. beta1a slowed down current activation, beta2a accelerated it and beta3 did not affect activation kinetics. In all cases alpha1CY467S was slightly faster than the wild-type alpha1C. B, inactivation kinetics were determined by fitting a single exponential function with a time constant tauinact to the decay phase of the current during a voltage step to +40 mV from a holding potential of -80 mV. For alpha1C and alpha1CY467S coexpressed with beta2a, test pulse duration was 4 s; for all other conditions test pulse duration was 400 ms. Only beta2a severely slowed down current inactivation, by a factor of ~10.

The most dramatic modulatory effect of a beta subunit appeared in the inactivation kinetics (Fig. 4B). Current inactivation was determined by fitting a single exponential function to the decaying phase of the current (for cells cotransfected with beta2a, 4 s-long test pulses were used instead of 400 ms pulses). Figure 4B shows the inactivation time constants for test pulses to +40 mV. Whereas coexpression with beta1a or beta3 had only small effects (P > 0·04), beta2a slowed current inactivation by a factor of approximately 10 (P < 0·0001). The inactivation kinetics of the mutant alpha1CY467S were indistinguishable from those of wild-type alpha1C.

Steady-state inactivation is not significantly modulated by the beta subunits

Steady-state inactivation was determined by measuring the current amplitude at a test potential of +40 mV (holding potential, -100 mV) after 10 s prepulses of different potentials (2 ms interpulse interval). Figure 5A shows the normalized current amplitudes as a function of the prepulse potential. The data were fitted by a Boltzmann function, the parameters of which are shown in Fig. 5B. The analysis did not indicate any modulatory effects of the beta subunits on steady-state inactivation, or any significant effects of the point mutation in alpha1C. Only the potential of half-maximal inactivation, V50, was different, being about 7 mV higher for alpha1CY467S than for alpha1C, when the alpha subunits were not coexpressed with a beta subunit, but this effect was not significant (P > 0·05). Although coexpression with the beta subunits resulted in small changes of V50, statistically there was no significant difference from the V50 values for alpha1C and alpha1CY467S expressed alone. The slope factor, k, was the same for all subunit combinations tested. Thus, steady-state inactivation of alpha1C was not subject to modulation by any one of the examined beta subunit isoforms.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 5. Steady-state inactivation in tsA201 cells transfected with alpha1C or alpha1CY467S with and without beta subunits

    A, normalized current amplitude during a voltage step from -100 to +40 mV after 10 s prepulses to various potentials with an interpulse interval of 2 ms (fullcir, alpha1C; cir, alpha1CY467S; means and S.E.M. of individual recordings are shown). There were only minor differences in steady-state inactivation between the different subunit combinations. B, steady-state inactivation curves for each individual recording were fitted by a Boltzmann function: i = 1/(1 + exp((V - V50)/k)), where i is the test pulse current amplitude, V is the prepulse potential, V50 is the prepulse potential of half-maximal inactivation and k is the slope factor, and the obtained parameters were subsequently averaged (squ, alpha1C; sp24, alpha1CY467S; error bars are S.E.M.). The apparent difference in the slopes of the averaged curves shown in the upper left figure in A is not reflected in the slope factor, k, shown in the right panel of B, due to the large variability of V50 for alpha1C expression (see error bar in left panel of B). This analysis does not indicate statistically significant differences in steady-state inactivation parameters between cells transfected with different subunit combinations.

Single-channel open probability of alpha1C is increased by beta1a

The data presented above suggest that the increase in whole-cell current density observed when alpha1C or alpha1CY467S was coexpressed with a beta subunit was not necessarily linked to an increase in plasma membrane localization of the alpha subunit, because the latter was not observed with alpha1CY467S. Thus, the possibility that the beta subunit-induced increase in current density is due to changes of single-channel properties, such as a higher open probability or single-channel conductance, needed to be addressed directly. Therefore we performed single-channel recordings of alpha1C or alpha1CY467S alone, and alpha1C or alpha1CY467S coexpressed with beta1a (Figs 6 and 7), the beta isoform that induced the largest current increase in whole-cell recordings. The amplitude of single-channel opening events, i, was about the same in all examined subunit combinations, showing that the single-channel conductance was not modulated by beta1a (i = 0·90 ± 0·05 pA for alpha1C, 1·00 ± 0·04 pA for alpha1C + beta1a, 1·00 ± 0·16 pA for alpha1CY467S, and 0·80 ± 0·03 pA for alpha1CY467S + beta1a (means ± S.E.M.)). In contrast, the frequency and the duration of channel openings increased significantly when alpha1C or alpha1CY467S was coexpressed with beta1a (Fig. 6). The open-state dwell time histograms (Fig. 6) show that coexpression of beta1a increased the mean open time 2-fold. The observation that the mutation itself did not change single-channel properties, together with the results from the whole-cell experiments, shows that the Y467S substitution does not mimic the effects of beta subunit coexpression. The fraction of null sweeps was highly variable from cell to cell but on average no significant differences between alpha1C + beta1a (51 %) and alpha1CY467S + beta1a (55 %) were observed.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 6. Single-channel recordings from tsA201 cells transfected with alpha1C (A), alpha1C + beta1a (B), alpha1CY467S (C) and alpha1CY467S + beta1a (D)

    Voltage pulses of 200 ms duration from a holding potential of -70 mV to a test potential of 0 mV were applied every 3 s. Coexpression of alpha1C or alpha1CY467S with the beta1a subunit resulted in an increased frequency of channel openings. The right panel shows open-state dwell time histograms. The mean open times, tau, obtained by fitting single exponential functions to the histograms, were increased by a factor of about 2 by beta1a coexpression.

In order to determine the single-channel open probability, Po, it was necessary to determine the number of channels, N, in each patch. The usual approach is to estimate N from the maximum number of conductance levels observed. This is reasonable only when Po is sufficiently high and the mean open time is sufficiently long to observe simultaneous openings of multiple channels. Due to the rare occurrence and short mean open time of events under the conditions used here, simultaneous openings of multiple channels are extremely unlikely and were almost never observed. Therefore we applied two different approaches to estimate N for each patch. In the first approach, we added the calcium channel agonist (±)-Bay K 8644 to the bath solution to a final concentration of 5 µM after we had recorded several hundred sweeps without (±)-Bay K 8644 for the analysis of NPo. With (±)-Bay K 8644 in the bath solution and depolarizations to +10 mV, channel openings lasting up to several hundred milliseconds occurred, allowing the observation of simultaneous openings of multiple channels in the patch (Fig. 7C). An all-points amplitude histogram of these recordings gives the number of conductance levels and thus the number of channels in the patch (Fig. 7D). With the value determined for N it was then possible to calculate Po (open symbols in Fig. 7A and open bars in Fig. 7B). The second approach to estimate the unknown N for each NPo value was a procedure based on theoretical considerations. This method does not require the application of the calcium channel agonist, allowing us to include recordings in the analysis that had not been tested for the number of channels with (±)-Bay K 8644, e.g. when the patch was not stable for long enough. The fitting procedure is based on the supposition that under the same experimental conditions the differences between the NPo values from different patches can only be due to different numbers of channels in the patches. Thus, the NPo values should always be an integer multiple (N) of the smallest possible value Po. In other words, when plotting NPo against N all data points should lie on a straight line crossing the abscissa at zero. According to this supposition, we estimated the unknown value N by assigning those values of N to each patch that resulted in the best linear regression through all data points and zero (Fig. 7A). The values for the single-channel open probability estimated with this method gave the same results as those obtained by the experimental approach (cf. open and filled bars in Fig. 7B). This indicates that the fitting method is a useful approach to estimate the number of channels in a patch, and thus to determine the single-channel open probability, when simultaneous openings of events are too rare to be detected or when the mean open time cannot be increased sufficiently by application of a channel agonist.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 7. Determination of the number of channels in a patch, N, and the single-channel open probability, Po

    Open probabilities for individual patches, NPo, were calculated from recordings from tsA201 cells transfected with alpha1C (cir), alpha1C + beta1a (square), or alpha1CY467S + beta1a (dtri) and plotted against the number of channels in each patch, N. N values were determined by two different approaches. (i) Open symbols in A represent recordings in which at the end of an experiment 5 µM (±)-Bay K 8644 was added to the bath solution to visualize simultaneous openings of multiple channels in the patch. C shows an example of the short and long openings before and after addition of (±)-Bay K 8644, respectively, in a cell transfected with alpha1CY467S and beta1a (upper trace, test pulse duration 200 ms at 0 mV; lower trace, test pulse duration 400 ms at +10 mV). The all-points amplitude histogram in D corresponding to the lower trace in C shows the number of conductance levels. (ii) Filled symbols in A represent recordings for which N values were estimated by finding the best fit of all NPo values in one experimental group to a linear regression crossing the abscissa at zero. Multiple data points with the same or similar NPo marked with 1 (squf, dtrif, dtrif) and 2 (fullcir, fullcir). The slope corresponds to the mean single-channel open probability. B, the Po values determined experimentally with (±)-Bay K 8644 (squ) closely match the values from the fitting procedure (squf; error bars give standard deviation). Coexpression of beta1a resulted in a 7- to 8-fold increase of Po.

Open probabilities determined for each condition according to these procedures were approximately 7- to 8-fold higher in cells coexpressing alpha1C or alpha1CY467S with beta1a than for cells expressing the alpha subunit alone. These single-channel data show that the beta1a-induced 4- to 5-fold increase in the specific conductance, g, seen in whole-cell recordings (Fig. 3B) can be fully explained by the increase in single-channel open probability without the need for an increased number of functional channels in the plasma membrane.

  DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In the present study we used heterologous expression of alpha1C with three different beta subunit isoforms in tsA201 cells to describe isoform-specific effects of the beta subunit on the subcellular distribution of the calcium channel subunits and on the modulation of current properties. The role of the beta subunit interaction domain in the cytoplasmic I-II linker of alpha1C was analysed by comparing the properties of wild-type alpha1C with those of an alpha1C construct in which tyrosine in position 467 was replaced with serine. Immunofluorescence and GFP fluorescence were used to determine the subcellular distribution patterns of the alpha1C and beta subunits, and current properties were studied with whole-cell and single-channel patch-clamp recordings. The combination of structural and functional analyses revealed beta isoform-specific effects on the targeting of both channel subunits and the modulation of calcium currents, but also showed that the two effects of the beta subunit are not causally linked.

Isoform-specific effects of beta1a, beta2a and beta3 on targeting of alpha1C and on current properties

Coexpression of alpha1C with one of the beta subunit isoforms resulted in changes of the subcellular distribution of both subunits and in changes in the current properties. Both structural and functional effects of the beta subunit on alpha1C showed differences depending on the beta isoform. When expressed alone, only beta2a was localized in the plasma membrane, whereas beta1a and beta3 were diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm. This is consistent with previous studies (Chien et al. 1995; Brice et al. 1997; Neuhuber et al. 1998b) and can be explained by the intrinsic ability of beta2a to associate with the plasma membrane via a palmitoylation site in its N-terminus. Without a beta subunit, alpha1C accumulated in the endoplasmic reticulum of tsA201 cells. In only a small fraction of transfected cells could clusters of alpha1C be visualized in the plasma membrane, even though calcium currents revealed the presence of functional channels in the majority of transfected cells. Apparently, without coexpression of the beta subunit the density of functionally expressed channels in the plasma membrane is too low to be detected with immunocytochemistry or GFP labelling. A rough estimate of the density of functional alpha1C subunits in the plasma membrane based on the single-channel properties and the whole-cell data yielded a channel density of 21 µm-2 (channel density = IpeakC/iPo = (0·72 × 0·01)/(0·9 × 0·00039) where Ipeak (at 0 mV) is in pA pF-1, i is in pA, and the specific membrane capacity (C) is in pF µm-2, assuming a value of C of 1 µF cm-2 = 0·01 pF µm-2). This value is far below the density of approximately 2200 channels µm-2 found in skeletal muscle triads where calcium channels can be reliably detected with immunocytochemistry.

When alpha1C was coexpressed with any one of the tested beta isoforms, alpha1C became detectable with immunocytochemistry and GFP labelling in the plasma membrane, where it was now colocalized with the beta subunit. This was accompanied by an increase in current density for all subunit combinations, indicating that alpha1C and beta formed complexes that facilitated the incorporation of channels into the plasma membrane. However, the results of the single-channel recordings show that the current increase observed with the beta subunits can be explained by changes of the single-channel properties, i.e. an increase in open channel probability. Thus the number of functional channels in the plasma membrane did not change during coexpression of alpha1C with beta. Neely et al. (1993) reached the same conclusion for experiments in which beta subunit coexpression led to an increase in whole-cell currents without a parallel increase in gating charges. However, other studies suggested that the increase in whole-cell currents was entirely or in part due to an increase in the number of channels in the plasma membrane (Wakamori et al. 1993; Kamp et al. 1996; Josephson & Varadi, 1996). Our observation that the massive incorporation of alpha1C-beta complexes into the plasma membrane was not accompanied by an increased number of functional channels suggests that some additional factor is limiting the expression of functional channels. If such a factor is saturated to different degrees in different experimental systems, it could explain why some investigators observed a beta subunit-induced increase in channel density while others did not.

The ability of the different beta isoforms to facilitate incorporation of alpha1C-beta complexes into the plasma membrane differed qualitatively and quantitatively. Coexpression of the plasma membrane-associated beta2a isoform resulted in an even distribution of alpha1C throughout the plasma membrane, suggesting that the intrinsic distribution of beta2a also determined the distribution of alpha1C. In addition, clusters of both subunits in the plasma membrane could be observed. The cytoplasmic beta1a and beta3 subunits were not homogeneously expressed throughout the plasma membrane when coexpressed with the alpha1 subunit, but instead were only found colocalized with alpha1C in distinct clusters. This indicates that their own translocation from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane is dependent on association with alpha1C and that an intrinsic predisposition of alpha1C to aggregate in clusters may determine the distribution of the alpha1C-beta complexes in the plasma membrane. Our observation that only about half of the cells coexpressing beta3 and alpha1C showed alpha1C-beta complexes in the plasma membrane, and in the other cells alpha1C and beta3 remained individually localized in the endoplasmic reticulum and the cytoplasm, respectively, suggests that beta3 binds to alpha1C with a somewhat lower affinity than beta1a and beta2a. This is consistent with data from De Waard et al. (1995) who showed that beta3 bound to alpha1A with lower affinity than beta1b, beta2a or beta4.

The isoform-specific modes of membrane targeting of the calcium channel alpha1C and beta subunits were paralleled by the isoform-specific modulation of whole-cell calcium currents. Whereas all three beta isoforms caused an increase of current density due to an increased specific conductance, a shift in the voltage dependence of activation was most pronounced with beta2a, and only beta2a caused a dramatic decrease in the rate of inactivation. A specific effect of beta2a on current inactivation has previously been shown for alpha1A and alpha1E when expressed in oocytes (Sather et al. 1993; Qin et al. 1996; Parent et al. 1997), indicating that the distinct effects of beta2a shown in the present study are not the result of combining the two native subunit partners of cardiac muscles; instead this property must reside on beta2a itself. The observation that beta2a differs from beta1a and beta3 in its targeting properties as well as in its modulatory ability suggests that these properties may be related. This interpretation is supported by a recent finding by Qin et al. (1998) showing that removal of the palmitoylation site in beta2a reversed several beta2a-specific modulatory effects on alpha1C and alpha1E. Thus, the subcellular organization of isolated calcium channel complexes has a profound influence on the functional characteristics of the channel.

Dissociation of effects of the beta subunit on targeting of alpha1C and on calcium currents

The substitution of a single residue (Y467S) in the beta subunit interaction domain of alpha1C disrupted the formation and incorporation of alpha1C-beta complexes into the plasma membrane but not the modulatory effects of beta on calcium currents. Pragnell et al. (1994) identified a motif of nine conserved amino acids that is critical for binding the beta subunit, in the cytoplasmic loop between repeats I and II of the alpha1 subunit. Mutations within this motif of alpha1A perturbed beta subunit binding (Pragnell et al. 1994). Here we have shown that alpha1CY467S and a coexpressed beta subunit did not colocalize in the plasma membrane but remained localized in distinct subcellular compartments. alpha1CY467S was concentrated in the endoplasmic reticulum, beta1a and beta3 were diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm, and beta2a was evenly distributed in the plasma membrane - all as when wild-type alpha1C and the beta subunits were expressed individually. Therefore we conclude that the stable association of alpha1CY467S and beta failed and that this had a dramatic effect on the incorporation of all subunits except beta2a into the plasma membrane. Previously we have shown that the stable association of the skeletal alpha1S isoform and beta1a can occur in the endoplasmic reticulum upon coexpression, as seen by translocation of beta1a from the cytoplasm to the endoplasmic reticulum, and that this translocation fails when the beta subunit interaction domain in alpha1S is mutated at the corresponding tyrosine residue (Y366S) (Neuhuber et al. 1998b). Here we observed in some cells the colocalization of the cytoplasmic beta subunits with alpha1C (but not with alpha1CY467S) in the endoplasmic reticulum, indicating that in these cells the two subunits formed a complex but were not efficiently transported to the plasma membrane. Therefore, if the mutation in the cardiac alpha1CY467S subunit had not perturbed binding, we would expect to see the colocalization of alpha1CY467S and beta in the endoplasmic reticulum, even if the export of alpha1CY467S from the endoplasmic reticulum had failed for a reason other than the lack of alpha1C-beta complex formation; but instead alpha1CY467S and the beta subunits remained in distinct compartments. Moreover, alpha1CY467S expressed alone generated calcium currents of the same magnitude as wild-type alpha1C, indicating that alpha1CY467S is a fully functional channel. Thus, the lack of colocalization of alpha1CY467S and the beta subunits indicates that none of the three examined beta isoforms form stable complexes with the mutated alpha1CY467S subunit.

Nevertheless, the increase in current density, the modulation of current kinetics, and the increase in single-channel open probability upon coexpression of beta were equally observed with wild-type alpha1C and the mutant alpha1CY467S. This shows first that the increased plasma membrane localization of alpha1C, observed when alpha1C was coexpressed with beta, is not a prerequisite for the increased current density, and second that the stable association of alpha1 with a beta subunit is not required for their functional interaction. Apparently, the majority of visible channels in the plasma membrane are not functional and unfortunately it cannot be unambiguously verified that the population of functional channels does not form complexes with the beta subunit as well. However, if the large visible fraction of alpha1CY467S channels fails to associate with beta subunits one can expect that the functional fraction will equally fail to do so and, consequently, their functional modulation by beta subunits most probably does not depend on the stable association of alpha1CY467S with a beta subunit. Our finding that upregulation of current density by beta is due to a mechanism other than the increased channel density, such as an increased channel open probability, is in agreement with several previous studies in which beta subunit-induced effects on single-channel properties have been reported (Neely et al. 1993; Wakamori et al. 1993; Shistik et al. 1995). In the present study we have shown an increase in dwell time and open probability of alpha1C and alpha1CY467S upon coexpression with beta1a. Whereas the analysis of the number of functional channels per patch gave no indication of a strong increase on coexpression with beta, single-channel open probability increased about 7- to 8-fold - more than enough to explain the increase in whole-cell current density. Consequently, the simultaneously occurring increase of detectable channels in the plasma membrane must be a parallel but not causally linked effect of the beta subunit; only in this way can one fail without affecting the other. In a recent study in Xenopus oocytes, Yamaguchi et al. (1998) showed similar separate effects of beta3 on the functional modulation of alpha1C and on increased membrane incorporation. They achieved a temporal dissociation of the two effects by injecting a beta3 fusion protein into alpha1C-expressing oocytes and were able to block membrane incorporation without affecting beta subunit-induced modulation of current kinetics and voltage dependence. Together, the study by Yamaguchi et al. (1998) and the present study provide strong evidence for dual and independent roles of the accessory beta subunit in targeting and modulation of the alpha1 subunit.

To what extent these functions contribute to the normal incorporation and function of the channels in the excitation-contraction coupling apparatus in muscle is not clear. Expression of the skeletal alpha1S isoform with the analogous mutation in the beta subunit interaction domain in skeletal myotubes of the dysgenic mouse also resulted in the disruption of alpha1S-beta1a complexes, although without perturbing the specific targeting of alpha1S into the triads and the reconstitution of normal function (Neuhuber et al. 1998a). This is consistent with the interpretation of the results presented here that beta subunits can exert their functions without forming stable alpha1-beta complexes. However, because in the muscle expression system calcium currents and excitation-contraction coupling could not be analysed in the absence of the endogenous beta subunit, functional modulation of calcium currents by beta could not be directly tested with alpha1S. Our present result that specific modulatory effects of three different beta subunits can all be observed with a mutated alpha1 subunit (alpha1CY467S), which fails to colocalize with the beta isoforms, provides strong evidence that the formation of alpha1C-beta complexes is not required for functional interactions between the two calcium channel subunits.

Dual mode of alpha1C-beta interactions

We observed two effects of the beta subunit on alpha1C: an increased incorporation of alpha1C into the plasma membrane which is dependent on the formation of stable alpha1C-beta complexes, and the modulation of current properties which is independent of the formation of stable alpha1C-beta complexes. The beta subunit interaction domain in the cytoplasmic loop between repeats I and II of alpha1C is clearly responsible for the stable association of alpha1C and beta, and for the increased incorporation of the complex into the plasma membrane. In contrast, it may or may not be the site of functional alpha1C-beta interactions. Either the point mutation lowered the affinity of this beta subunit interaction domain on alpha1C or a second, low affinity interaction domain exists apart from that in the I-II linker. In either case high concentrations of free beta subunit in the cytoplasm or in the plasma membrane could interact with such a low affinity binding site and thus cause functional modulation without forming a stable complex. Distinct domains for the functional modulation of alpha1 have been described on the beta subunit (Olcese et al. 1994; Cens et al. 1998). Furthermore, a second low affinity binding domain in alpha1E that mediates modulation of inactivation kinetics has been described (Walker et al. 1998). However, these results differ from the present data in that other functional effects of the beta subunit on alpha1E, like the increase in current amplitude, were mediated by the I-II linker, whereas in our study the loss of binding to the I-II linker of alpha1C did not perturb any modulatory effects of beta on current properties. Finally, it has been suggested that more than one beta subunit can interact simultaneously with different binding sites on the alpha1 subunit. Our results are consistent with such a model in that structural and functional effects of beta subunit coexpression appeared to be independent. However, one can also envisage a mechanism for alpha1C-beta interactions by which binding of a beta subunit to the beta subunit interaction domain in the I-II linker brings beta into a position to interact with the functionally important residues on alpha1C, but that this binding is not necessarily required.

In all, the results of this study show that the beta subunits of calcium channels serve a dual function, firstly in the formation of a complex with alpha1C and its incorporation into the plasma membrane and secondly in the modulation of single-channel calcium current properties, but it also shows that these two functions of the beta subunit are independent of each other.

  REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Birnbaumer, L., Campbell, K. P., Catterall, W. A., Harpold, M. M., Hofmann, F., Horne, W. A., Mori, Y., Schwartz, A., Snutch, T. P. & Tanabe, T. (1994). The naming of voltage-gated calcium channels. Neuron 13, 505-506 [Medline]
Brice, N. L., Berrow, N. S., Campbell, V., Page, K. M., Brickley, K., Tedder, I. & Dolphin, A. C. (1997). Importance of the different beta subunits in the membrane expression of the alpha1A and alpha2 calcium channel subunits: studies using a depolarization-sensitive alpha1A antibody. European Journal of Neuroscience 9, 749-759 [Medline]
Castellano, A., Wei, X., Birnbaumer, L. & Perez-Reyes, E. (1993). Cloning and expression of a neuronal calcium channel beta subunit. Journal of Biological Chemistry 268, 12359-12366 [Abstract]
Cens, T., Restituito, S., Vallentin, A. & Charnet, P. (1998). Promotion and inhibition of L-type Ca2+ channel facilitation by distinct domains of the beta subunit. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 18308-18315 [Abstract/Full Text]
Chien, A. J., Carr, K. M., Shirokov, R. E., Rios, E. & Hosey, M. M. (1996). Identification of palmitoylation sites within the L-type calcium channel beta2a subunit and effects on channel function. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 26465-26468 [Abstract/Full Text]
Chien, A. J., Zhao, X., Shirokov, R. E., Puri, T. S., Chang, C. F., Sun, D., Rios, E. & Hosey, M. M. (1995). Roles of membrane-localized beta subunit in the formation and targeting of functional L-type Ca2+ channels. Journal of Biological Chemistry 270, 30036-30044 [Abstract/Full Text]
De Waard, M., Pragnell, M. & Campbell, K. P. (1994). Ca2+-channel regulation by a conserved beta subunit domain. Neuron 13, 495-503 [Medline]
De Waard, M., Scott, V. E., Pragnell, M. & Campbell, K. P. (1996). Identification of critical amino acids involved in alpha1-beta interaction in voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. FEBS Letters 380, 272-276 [Medline]
De Waard, M., Witcher, D. R., Pragnell, M., Liu, H. & Campbell, K. P. (1995). Properties of the alpha1-beta anchoring site in voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Journal of Biological Chemistry 270, 12056-12064 [Abstract/Full Text]
Flucher, B. E., Andrews, S. B., Fleischer, S., Marks, A. R., Caswell, A. H. & Powell, J. A. (1993). Triad formation: organization and function of the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release channel and triadin in normal and dysgenic muscle in vitro. Journal of Cell Biology 123, 1161-1174. [Abstract]
Grabner, M., Dirksen, R. T. & Beam, K. G. (1998). Tagging with green fluorescent protein reveals a distinct subcellular distribution of L-type and non-L-type Ca2+ channels expressed in dysgenic myotubes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95, 1903-1908 [Abstract/Full Text]
Gregg, R. G., Messing, A., Strube, C., Beurg, M., Moss, R., Behan, M., Sukhareva, M.,