J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 532, Number 2, 359-367, April 15, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pessia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pessia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, S. J.
Journal of Physiology (2001), 532.2, pp. 359-367
© Copyright 2001 The Physiological Society

Differential pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 and Kir4.2 potassium channels and their modulation by heteropolymerisation with Kir5.1


Mauro Pessia, Paola Imbrici, Maria Cristina D'Adamo, Lorena Salvatore * and Stephen J. Tucker †


Department of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology and * Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Pathology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri', Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, 66030 Santa Maria Imbaro (Chieti), Italy and †University Laboratory of Physiology, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK

MS 11513 Received 7 August 2000; accepted after revision 6 December 2000

  ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. The inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir5.1 appears to form functional channels only by coexpression with either Kir4.1 or Kir4.2. Kir4.1-Kir5.1 heteromeric channels have been shown to exist in vivo in renal tubular epithelia. However, Kir5.1 is expressed in many other tissues where Kir4.1 is not found. Using Kir5.1-specific antibodies we have localised Kir5.1 expression in the pancreas, a tissue where Kir4.2 is also highly expressed.

  2. Heteromeric Kir5.1-Kir4.1 channels are significantly more sensitive to intracellular acidification than Kir4.1 currents. We demonstrate that this increased sensitivity is primarily due to modulation of the intrinsic Kir4.1 pH sensitivity by Kir5.1.

  3. Kir4.2 was found to be significantly more pH sensitive (pKa = 7.1) than Kir4.1 (pKa = 5.99) due to an additional pH-sensing mechanism involving the C-terminus. As a result, coexpression with Kir5.1 does not cause a major shift in the pH sensitivity of the heteromeric Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channel.

  4. Cell-attached single channel analysis of Kir4.2 revealed a channel with a high open probability (Po > 0.9) and single channel conductance of ~25 pS, whilst coexpression with Kir5.1 produced novel bursting channels (Po < 0.3) and a principal conductance of ~54 pS with several subconductance states.

  5. These results indicate that Kir5.1 may form heteromeric channels with Kir4.2 in tissues where Kir4.1 is not expressed (e.g. pancreas) and that these novel channels are likely to be regulated by changes in intracellular pH. In addition, the extreme pH sensitivity of Kir4.2 has implications for the role of this subunit as a homotetrameric channel.

  INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels are found in almost every cell type where they play key roles in controlling membrane potential, cellular excitability and K+ fluxes (Nichols & Lopatin, 1997; Reimann & Ashcroft, 1999). A large number of clones have now been identified which encode Kir channels and these can be divided into seven major subfamilies (Kir1.0-Kir7.0). Until recently very little was known about the only member of the Kir5.0 subfamily, Kir5.1 (Bond et al. 1994). This subunit is unusual in that it only appears to form functional K+ channels when assembled as a heteromeric channel with members of the Kir4.0 subfamily, Kir4.1 and Kir4.2 (Pessia et al. 1996; Pearson et al. 1999).

The functional role of these heteromeric Kir4.0-Kir5.1 channels remains unclear. However, recent studies have shown that Kir4.1-Kir5.1 heteromeric channels exist in vivo in renal tubular epithelia. In addition these heteromeric channels have been shown to be extremely sensitive to inhibition by protons within the physiological pH range (Tanemoto et al. 2000; Tucker et al. 2000; Xu et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2000). There is therefore an emerging role for these channels in the pH-dependent regulation of K+ fluxes and acid-base homeostasis.

Extensive studies with Kir1.1, another pH-sensitive channel, have shown that the primary pH sensor is a lysine residue found within a highly conserved region of the proximal N-terminus (Fakler et al. 1996; Schulte et al. 1999). Lysine is normally fully protonated under physiological conditions. However, this lysine residue in Kir1.1 (K80) exhibits anomalous titration due to its close association with two highly conserved arginine residues, one in the intracellular N-terminus and one in intracellular C-terminus (Schulte et al. 1999). This implies that the two intracellular domains of this channel are in close physical proximity to form this 'Arg-Lys-Arg' triad. This is supported by recent evidence which demonstrates a direct physical and functional interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains (Schulte et al. 1998; Tucker & Ashcroft, 1999).

Several different studies have also revealed that there is a correlation between the intrinsic sensitivity of a Kir channel to intracellular pH and the presence of a lysine residue at the equivalent position to K80 in Kir1.1. One such example is Kir4.1, which also forms pH-sensitive homomeric channels (Schulte et al. 1999; Yang & Jiang, 1999). Like Kir1.1, the pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 channels is primarily determined by a similar titratable lysine residue in the proximal N-terminus (K67), which is equivalent to K80 in Kir1.1. However the intrinsic pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 channels (pK = 6.0) is significantly lower than that of Kir1.1 (pKa = 6.9) and regulation of Kir4.1 channels by pHi is only likely to be significant in cases of extreme intracellular acidosis.

We and others have recently shown that the intrinsic pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 can be modified by heteropolymerisation with Kir5.1 (Tanemoto et al. 2000; Tucker et al. 2000; Xu et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2000). Coexpression of Kir4.1 with Kir5.1 produces novel K+ channels with a significantly 'enhanced' pH sensitivity (pKa = 7.35). Inhibition of these channels by protons is direct and does not involve a reduction in the single-channel conductance (Tucker et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2000). Interestingly, the pH sensitivity of these heteromeric channels still appears to be governed by the Kir4.1 subunit. Mutation of the titratable lysine residue (K67M) in Kir4.1 almost completely abolishes the pH sensitivity of the heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels (Xu et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2000). However, the mechanism by which Kir5.1 alters the intrinsic pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 remains to be determined.

Although Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 have been shown to form heteromeric channels in vivo their tissue specific patterns of expression do not completely overlap. RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis have shown Kir5.1 to be expressed in several tissues where Kir4.1 is not, and vice versa (Bond et al. 1994; Shuck et al. 1997). It is therefore highly likely that other subunits permit functional expression of Kir5.1 in tissues where Kir4.1 is not found. We have therefore investigated the properties of the related subunit Kir4.2 which is also pH sensitive and which forms heteromeric channels with Kir5.1 (Pearson et al. 1999).

In this study we have used Kir5.1 specific antibodies to reveal abundant expression of Kir5.1 in the pancreas, a tissue where Kir4.2 (but not Kir4.1) is expressed (Shuck et al. 1997; Gosset et al. 1997). We have also further investigated the contribution of Kir5.1 to the pH sensitivity of Kir4.0-Kir5.1 heteromeric channels and have determined some of the primary biophysical properties of both Kir4.2 and Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels. We demonstrate that in addition to a titratable lysine residue in the N-terminus, Kir4.2 has an additional pH-sensing mechanism involving the intracellular C-terminal domain. This mechanism renders homomeric Kir4.2 channels significantly more sensitive to intracellular acidification than Kir4.1 and is unaffected by heteropolymerisation with Kir5.1. These results have important implications for the role of Kir4.2 in tissues where Kir5.1 is both present and absent.

  METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Immunohistochemistry

Procedures involving animals and their care have been conducted in conformity with the institutional guidelines that are in compliance with national and international laws and policies (EEC Council Directive 86/609, OJ L 358,1, 1987). In accordance with these institutional guidelines, 60-day-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were deeply anaesthetised by intraperitoneal injection with Nembutal (40 mg kg-1); tissues were washed and fixed by intracardiac perfusion with sodium phosphate buffer (PBS 0.1 M, pH 7.4) and with 10 % buffered formalin. The production and specificity of the anti-Kir5.1 antibody has previously been described in detail (Salvatore et al. 1999). Sections of pancreas were prepared, fixed and stained as described before (Salvatore et al. 1999). Antibody staining was visualised using 3,5'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and tissues were counterstained with methylene blue. Control sections were stained with the anti-Kir5.1 antibody previously absorbed to an excess of antigenic peptide (Salvatore et al. 1999).

Molecular biology

All channel subunits were subcloned into the oocyte expression vector pBF, which provides 5' and 3' untranslated regions from the Xenopus beta-globin gene flanking a polylinker containing multiple restriction sites. In vitro mRNAs were generated using the SP6 polymerase. Kir subunits were joined in tandem as previously described (Pessia et al. 1996). This method provides control for the stoichiometry of the heteromeric channels and does not affect channel function (Pessia et al. 1996; Tucker et al. 2000). Kir4.1-Kir4.2 chimeras were constructed by extension overlap PCR. Splicing of the C-terminus was between residues 171 of Kir4.1 and 170 of Kir4.2.

Electrophysiology

Two-electrode voltage-clamp recording (TEVC). The care and handling of Xenopus laevis were in accordance with the highest standards of institutional guidelines in compliance with both national and international laws and policies (see above). Frogs underwent no more than two surgeries, separated by at least 3 weeks. Frogs were anaesthetised with an aerated solution of 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester. Standard recording solution contained 90 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) unless otherwise stated. Intracellular acidification was achieved using a potassium acetate buffering system (Choe et al. 1997). Only one pH/inhibition value per cell was determined in TEVC experiments. Microelectrodes were filled with 3 M KCl and had resistances of 0.1-0.5 MOmega. Recordings were performed at 22 °C, 18-48 h after injection with a GeneClamp 500 amplifier (Axon Instruments) interfaced to a Power Macintosh 7200/90 computer with an ITC-16 computer interface (Instrutech Corp., NY, USA). Currents were evoked by voltage commands from a holding potential of -10 mV, delivered in -10 mV increments from +50 to -120 mV, unless otherwise stated.

Patch-clamp recording

Patch-clamp recordings were performed at room temperature (22 °C) using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments). Oocytes were bathed in a cytoplasmic solution containing 120 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 11 mM EGTA, 10 mM Hepes, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol (pH 7.2). Recording electrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass, dipped in sticky wax (Kerr, Emoryville, CA, USA) prior to polishing, and had resistances of 3-15 MOmega. The pipette solution contained 120 mM KCl, 10 mM Hepes, 200 µM CaCl2 (pH 7.2). Patch records were obtained in the cell-attached and inside-out configuration by stepping the holding potential to various test potentials for 20-60 s. Junction potentials between bath and pipette solutions were properly nullified. Current traces at each holding potential were filtered at 1 kHz with a 4-pole low-pass Bessel filter and acquired at 5-10 kHz with a Pulse+PulseFit program (HEKA Elektronik GmbH, Germany). Channel activity was analysed with a TAC-TACfit program (Bruxton Co., Seattle, WA, USA) using the 50 % threshold technique to determine the event amplitude. Channel openings were visually inspected before being accepted (event-by-event mode).

Inside-out giant patches were obtained by using borosilicate pipettes that had resistances of 0.4-1 MOmega. The composition of the intracellular and extracellular solutions was as described above. The cytoplasmic solutions of different pHs were applied through a fast-flow system by using multibarrel pipettes. Macroscopic currents were recorded by applying voltage ramps from -100 to 100 mV (filtered at 1 kHz and digitised at 5 kHz). For each giant patch all pH/inhibition data points were sequentially determined. The pHi-inhibition relationships were constructed by including in the analysis only giant-patch macroscopic currents showing minimal run-down assessed as complete return of the current amplitudes to control levels.

  RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Immunolocalisation of Kir5.1 in the pancreas

Due to the incomplete overlap in the tissue-specific distribution of Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 we chose to examine Kir5.1 expression in tissues where Kir4.2 is expressed but Kir4.1 is not. Using Northern blot analysis Shuck et al. (1997) have previously shown Kir4.2 mRNA to be abundantly expressed in the pancreas but found no evidence of Kir4.1 expression. To determine whether Kir5.1 is also expressed in pancreatic tissues we utilised highly specific anti-Kir5.1 polyclonal antibodies. These antibodies have been used previously to detect Kir5.1 expression in the kidney and testes (Salvatore et al. 1999; Tucker et al. 2000). Immunohistochemical analysis of 60-day-old rat pancreatic tissues revealed Kir 5.1 to be localised in both the exocrine (acini) and the endocrine (islets of Langerhans) regions (Fig. 1A). No detectable immunoreactivity was observed in the control staining (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, a particularly intense ABC-immunoperoxidase staining was detected in the pancreatic arteriolae (Fig. 1C). The endothelial cells of these vessels appear positively stained, although further work is required to determine a more detailed localisation of Kir5.1 within this structure.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 1. Immunohistochemical localization of Kir 5.1 subunits in the rat pancreas

    A, Kir 5.1 immunoreactivity was detected in the islets of Langerhans (arrows) and also on the acinar cells (*). B, control slices show total absence of brown staining. C, an intense immunoreactivity is detectable in pancreatic arteriolae (arrow) and acinar cells (*). Scale bars: 25 µm in A and B; 10 µm in C.

Kir5.1 enhances the intrinsic pH sensitivity of Kir4.1

We and others have recently shown that heteropolymerisation of Kir5.1 with Kir4.1 produces novel channels which have an enhanced sensitivity to inhibition by intracellular acidification (Tanemoto et al. 2000; Tucker et al. 2000; Xu et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2000). However, in addition to inhibition by acidification, Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels also exhibit activation by alkalinisation. Figure 2A shows currents recorded from an excised inside-out membrane patch from Xenopus oocytes expressing Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels. These channels exhibit clear activation upon exposure to recording solution at pH 8.0, which is readily reversible upon return to control solution at pH 7.0.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 2. Modulation of Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel activity by acidification and alkalinisation

    A, inside-out patch recordings from oocytes expressing Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels. Channel openings were evoked by hyperpolarising pulses to -100 mV, from a holding potential of 0 mV. The representative trace shows the effect on channel activity by the application of a cytoplasmic solution at pH 8, through a multibarrel fast-flow pipette. B, whole-cell representative current traces recorded from a Xenopus oocyte expressing Kir4.1(K67M)-Kir5.1(M73K) channels. Currents were evoked by hyperpolarisation to -100 mV for 4 s from a holding potential of -10 mV followed by a 2 s pulse to +40 mV. Current traces are shown before (control) and after intracellular acidification to the indicated value (pHi 6.4). C, intracellular pH vs. current inhibition for Kir4.1-Kir5.1 (cir), Kir4.1 (fullcir), Kir4.1(K67M)-Kir5.1 (utri), Kir4.1(K67M)-Kir5.1(M73K) () and Kir4.1(K67M) (). Data points were obtained from currents recorded at -100 mV in the TEVC configuration in control conditions and during the perfusion of a membrane-permeant potassium acetate buffer that reduces the oocyte intracellular pH to the indicated value (mean ± S.E.M. of 6-8 oocytes). The continuous line shows the fit with the equation 1/[1 + ([H+]i - K)n] from which the apparent pKa values were calculated. D, relative current inhibition (as recorded in B) that was induced by intracellular acidification to pH 6.3 for wild-type and mutant channels.

The primary determinant of the pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 is a lysine residue (K67) in the N-terminus (Schulte et al. 1999). In order to monitor the response of these channels to intracellular acidification we utilised a well-established potassium acetate buffering system previously used to study these channels (Choe et al. 1997). Whole-cell currents were then recorded by two-electrode voltage clamp from oocytes expressing different combinations of Kir subunits. Measurement of pH sensitivity using this method is less accurate than measurement in excised patches due to the activity of these channels in the pH 7.5-8.0 range and the inability to alkalinise the intracellular pH. However, the values recorded provide clear indication of the relative differences between channels and more accurate estimations of the pKa were determined in giant inside-out excised patches and are shown in Fig. 5 and Table 1.

tab1

In agreement with the findings of Xu et al. (2000) the Kir4.1(K67M) mutation has profound effects on the pH sensitivity of both Kir4.1 and Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels (Fig. 2C ; Table 1). Interestingly, we found that either subunit is capable of acting as the pH sensor. Wild-type Kir5.1 does not possess a lysine residue at the equivalent position within the N-terminus. However, the pH sensitivity of these Kir4.1(K67M)-Kir5.1 channels could be restored by replacing the equivalent residue in Kir5.1 with a lysine residue, Kir4.1(K67M)-Kir5.1(M73K) (Fig. 2B and C ; Table 1). This provides further evidence for the role of a titratable lysine residue at this position in determining the primary pH sensitivity of Kir channels (Fakler et al. 1996) and also suggests that Kir subunits utilise a common structural gating mechanism which is adapted for modulation by a variety of physiological parameters.

The mechanism by which Kir5.1 enhances the pH sensitivity of the heteromeric channel remains unclear. We therefore attempted to determine the contribution of Kir5.1 to the enhanced pH sensitivity of the heteromeric channel. Figure 2D shows the effect of individually mutating all the intracellular histidines in the Kir5.1 subunit and coexpressing them with Kir4.1 as a tandemly linked dimer. These results clearly show that none of the intracellular histidines in Kir5.1 contribute significantly to the enhanced pH sensitivity of the heteromeric channel.

Kir4.2 forms pH-sensitive channels with and without Kir5.1

The absence of Kir4.1 expression in certain tissues, for example pancreas (Shuck et al. 1996), where Kir5.1 is expressed, means that other subunits are likely to permit functional expression of Kir5.1. Kir4.2 shares 65 % identity to Kir4.1 and is highly expressed in the pancreas (Shuck et al. 1997). Pearson et al. (1999) have previously shown that Kir4.2 also forms novel heteromeric channels with Kir5.1 and that Kir4.2 homomeric channels possess an intrinsic sensitivity to intracellular acidification. However the precise pH sensitivity of these channels has yet to be determined. In order to assess the pH sensitivity of Kir4.2 and Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels both TEVC and excised giant patch recordings of channel activity were carried out (Fig. 3). In particular, the response of both channels to intracellular acidification is shown in Fig. 4A. As expected Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels were also responsive to changes in pHi in the physiological range (Table 1). However, Fig. 4A and Fig. 5 show that the response of these heteromeric Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels to pHi was only slightly different from that of Kir4.2 itself. Thus, despite their similarity, Kir4.2 is significantly more sensitive to changes in pHi than Kir4.1 and in contrast to Kir4.1 this enhanced sensitivity is not markedly altered by heteropolymerisation with Kir5.1.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 3. Kir4.2 and Kir4.2-Kir5.1 currents are inhibited by intracellular acidification

    A, representative whole-cell current traces recorded in the TEVC configuration from Xenopus oocytes expressing the indicated channels. The recordings were performed as detailed in Fig. 2B. C and D, I-V curves that were evoked by 1 s voltage ramps from -100 to +100 mV and were recorded using inside-out giant patches excised from oocytes expressing Kir4.2 (C) and Kir4.2-Kir5.1 (D) channels. The currents shown exhibit little rectification as they were were recorded in the absence of Mg2+ and polyamines and during the cytoplasmic application of solutions at the indicated pHs through a multibarrel fast-flow system. Strong rectification was observed in the cell-attached configuration before patch excision into Mg2+- and polyamine-free solution.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 4

    A, pH sensitivity of Kir4.2 and Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels to intracellular pH. Intracellular pH vs. current inhibition determined in TEVC configuration for Kir4.2 (fullcir), Kir4.2-Kir5.1 (cir) and Kir4.2(K66M) (). B, increased sensitivity of Kir4.2 correlates with the C-terminal region. Intracellular pH vs. current inhibition determined as in A for Kir4.1 (cir) and Kir4.2 (fullcir) compared to chimeras 31B () and 31C (utri) which exchange the intracellular C-terminus (see inset). The difference in sensitivity between the two subunits correlates with the C-terminus.

Differential pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 and Kir4.2

We therefore attempted to identify the structural elements which define the pH sensitivity of Kir4.2. This subunit also possesses a lysine residue at the equivalent position to K67 in Kir4.1 and K80 in Kir1.1. As expected mutation of this residue almost completely abolished the pH sensitivity of both homomeric Kir4.2 and heteromeric Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels (Fig. 4A). This provides further evidence for the primary role of the Kir4.0 subunit in determining the pH sensitivity of the heteromeric Kir4.0-Kir5.1 channel and also further evidence for the role of a titratable lysine residue in determining this characteristic. However, this did not explain the increased pH sensitivity of Kir4.2 compared to Kir4.1 and the differential modulation of their pH sensitivity by Kir5.1 (Fig. 4A and Fig. 5; Table 1). We therefore made chimeras between Kir4.1 and Kir4.2 and determined their response to changes in pHi. Figure 4B shows that the sensitivity of Kir4.2 to pHi in the physiological range appears to correlate with the intracellular C-terminus.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 5. pH sensitivity of Kir4.2 and Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels recorded in excised patches

    pH vs. relative inhibition as determined by exposure of excised, inside-out giant membrane patches to different pH solutions.

Single channel properties of Kir4.2 and Kir4.2-Kir5.1

We have also investigated the principal single channel properties of both homomeric Kir4.2 and heteromeric Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels. Using cell-attached membrane patches from oocytes expressing either Kir4.2 alone, or expressing tandemly linked Kir4.2-Kir5.2, we have determined the single channel conductance of Kir4.2 and Kir4.2-Kir5.1. Representative single channel recordings for Kir4.2 are shown in Fig. 6A. This shows that Kir4.2 forms channels similar to Kir4.1 with an extremely high open probability (Po > 0.9) and conductance of 25.2 pS. Figure 7 shows that heteropolymerisation of Kir5.1 with Kir4.2 profoundly alters the biophysical properties. These novel channels have a principal single channel conductance of 54.2 pS with additional subconductance levels. The peak values of the Gaussian distribution obtained from the recording shown in Fig. 7 are 5.1, 3.3 and 2.4 pA, indicating the presence of at least two subconductance levels of ~0.65 and ~0.45 of the full open state current. Moreover, these channels display a bursting pattern similar to Kir4.1-Kir5.1 (Pessia et al. 1996) with very long closed times (> 10 s) between bursts.

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 6. Single-channel properties of homomeric Kir4.2

    A, representative cell-attached patch recording at -100 mV from an oocyte expressing Kir4.2 channels. The bottom record is shown on an expanded time scale. B, current-voltage relationship of Kir4.2. A slope conductance of 25.2 pS was calculated from the fit with a linear regression line. The extrapolated zero-current potential was approximately -14 mV. Each data point represents the average channel current calculated from amplitude histograms (mean ± S.D. of 6 patches pulled from different oocytes).

View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

    Figure 7. Single-channel properties of heteromeric Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels

    A, representative cell-attached patch recording at -100 mV from an oocyte expressing tandemly linked Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels. The bottom record is shown on an expanded time scale. B, current-voltage relationship of Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channel. A slope conductance of 54.2 pS was calculated from the fit with a linear regression line. The extrapolated zero-current potential was approximately -30 mV. Each data point represent the average channel current calculated from amplitude histograms (mean ± S.D. of 6 patches pulled from different oocytes).

  DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

This study demonstrates that other subunits such as Kir4.2 are likely candidates to facilitate functional expression of Kir5.1 in tissues where Kir4.1 is not expressed and suggests a role for these channels in the pH-dependent regulation of K+ fluxes. As well as determining some of the basic properties of Kir4.2 and Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels we also demonstrate that Kir5.1 has different effects on the intrinsic pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 and Kir4.2. This is due to the presence of an additional pH-sensing mechanism involving the C-terminus of Kir4.2.

Relative tissue distribution of Kir4.1, Kir4.2 and Kir5.1.

As several previous studies have shown, Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 do not share perfectly overlapping patterns of tissue distribution (Bond et al. 1994; Shuck et al. 1997; Salvatore et al. 1999; Tucker et al. 2000). The detection of Kir5.1 expression in the pancreas is of particular interest. Kir4.1 expression is either low or absent in this tissue, but Kir4.2 is abundantly expressed (Shuck et al. 1997). This suggests that in cases where Kir4.1 is absent, Kir4.2 may heteropolymerise with Kir5.1 to form novel pH-sensitive channels. Figure 1 shows Kir5.1 expression to be detectable in both the exocrine and endocrine regions of the pancreas and interestingly in the pancreatic arteriolae. The exocrine regions of the pancreas are responsible for the secretion of bicarbonate as well as digestive enzymes. This involves the production of bicarbonate by carbonic anhydrase and excess protons. These are removed via the Na+-H+ exchanger which is in turn driven by the Na+-K+-ATPase. Secretion of both H+ and HCO3- therefore results in a build-up of intracellular K+. It is therefore possible that heteromeric Kir4.2-Kir5.1 channels are involved in the pH-dependent secretion of K+ produced by this route.

Mechanisms of pH sensing

Initially the dramatic effect of Kir5.1 on the intrinsic pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 suggested that Kir5.1 may possess additional pH-sensing mechanisms. However, as shown in Fig. 2, this is unlikely to be the case. Individual mutation of each intracellular histidine in Kir5.1 had no significant effect on the pH sensitivity of the heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels. By contrast mutation of lysine 67 (K67M) in Kir4.1 completely abolished the pH sensitivity of these channels. Some debate still continues as to whether this lysine residue is actually titrated at physiological pH. However, studies by Schulte et al. (1999) have provided good evidence for anomalous titration of this lysine residue and have shown that this is due to an interaction of this lysine with two highly conserved arginine residues, one in the N-terminus and one in the C-terminus. These arginine residues are thought to create a positively charged environment around the lysine residue and produce anomalous titration with a pKa in the physiological range. These arginine residues are absolutely conserved in all known Kir channels.

Kir subunits which do not possess an appropriate lysine residue in the N-terminus are not generally sensitive to changes in intracellular pH within the physiological range. Further evidence to support the role of this titratable lysine residue comes from the double mutant Kir4.1(K67M)-Kir5.1(M73K) where the equivalent position in Kir5.1 is replaced with a lysine residue. Figure 2B and C shows that this mutation essentially reverses the effect of the Kir4.1(K67M) mutation and brings the pKa back into the physiological range. It is therefore unlikely that the principal pH-sensing mechanisms are elsewhere on the Kir channel, and because only two subunits in the heteromeric channel possess 'titratable lysines' this also implies that closure of all four gates is not essential for channel closure. The results also suggest that the highly conserved region of the proximal N-terminus containing this lysine residue forms part of an evolutionarily conserved gating mechanism involving a physical association of both intracellular domains. Indeed, recent studies have indicated that conserved interactions between the N- and C-terminal domains of the Kir channel subunits may provide a common structural gating mechanism. In addition, the two arginine residues which produce anomalous titration of the pH-sensitive lysine residue both lie within conserved regions which contribute to the physical association of the N- and C-terminal domains of Kir channels (Schulte et al. 1998, 1999; Tucker & Ashcroft, 1999). Taken together, these results indicate that protonation of this lysine residue might influence the interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains and thereby provide a mechanism for modulating gating of the channel.

Differential modulation of Kir4.0 pH sensitivity by Kir5.1 and structural implications

In addition to modulating the gating and single channel properties of Kir4.1 channels, heteropolymerisation with Kir5.1 causes a significant shift in the pH sensitivity bringing the pKa of Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels into the physiological range. However, Kir5.1 has relatively little influence on the intrinsic pH sensitivity of Kir4.2. This subunit has previously been shown to be pH sensitive, although the pKa value was not known. In this study we have obtained a pKa value of approximately 7.1 for Kir4.2 in excised patches (see Table 1). This ranks Kir4.2 as one of the most pH sensitive of all the Kir channels. Although heteropolymerisation with Kir5.1 causes a small but significant shift in pH sensitivity, this shift is minor compared to the effect of Kir5.1 on Kir4.1 because it is masked by the additional pH sensitivity of Kir4.2. Chimeric analysis revealed that this enormous difference in the intrinsic pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 and Kir4.2 is due to differences in the C-terminus of these subunits. Figure 4B shows that transfer of the C-terminus of Kir4.2 into Kir4.1 can enhance the pH sensitivity to a value similar to Kir4.2. However, this effect is secondary to the primary pH sensor of Kir4.2 provided by a titratable lysine residue at an equivalent position to K67 in Kir4.1. Figure 4A shows that mutation of this residue (K66M) almost completely abolishes the pH response of these channels.

The ability of Kir5.1 to modulate the intrinsic pH sensor of Kir4.1 (K67) implies that the inter-subunit interactions produced by heteropolymerisation of Kir5.1 with Kir4.1 can influence the intra-subunit interactions which define the anomalous titration of the N-terminal lysine pH sensor. It is likely that even small adjustments in the steric arrangement of the 'Arg-Lys-Arg triad' could have a dramatic effect on the pKa of the residue and thereby the pH-dependent regulation of channel activity.

Physiological consequences of differential heteropolymerisation and pH modulation

The ability of individual potassium channel subunits to heteropolymerise is of fundamental importance in generating diversity of function from a limited number of gene products. The ability of Kir5.1 to have a profound effect on the pH sensitivity of Kir4.1 may be important for the role of this channel in renal tubular epithelia where this heteromeric channel is thought to be involved in acid-base homeostasis. However, a slightly lower pH sensitivity may be important in those tissues where Kir4.1 forms homomeric channels and where Kir5.1 is not expressed. The fact that the distribution of Kir5.1, Kir4.1 and Kir4.2 does not appear to be completely overlapping suggests that a variety of both heteromeric and homomeric combinations of these channels are involved in the pH-dependent regulation of K+ fluxes.

  REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

BOND C. T., PESSIA, M., XIA, X.-M., LAGRUTTA, A., KAVANAUGH, M. P. & ADELMAN, J. P. (1994). Cloning and expression of a family of inward rectifier potassium channels. Receptors and Channels 2, 183-191 [Medline]
CHOE H., ZHOU, H., PALMER, G. & SACKIN, H. (1997). A conserved cytoplasmic region of ROMK modulates pH sensitivity, conductance, and gating. American Journal of Physiology 273, F516-529 [Medline]
FAKLER B., SCHULTZ, J. H., YANG, J., SCHULTE, U., BRANDLE, U., ZENNER, H. P., JAN, L. Y. & RUPPERSBERG, J. P. (1996). Identification of a titratable lysine residue that determines sensitivity of kidney potassium channels (ROMK) to intracellular pH. EMBO Journal 15, 4093-4099 [Abstract]
GOSSET P., GHEZALA, G., KORN, B., YASPO, M., POUTSKA, A., LEHRACH, H., SINET, P. & CREAU, N. (1997). A new inward rectifier potassium channel gene (KCNJ15) localized on chromosome 21 in the Down Syndrome chromosome region 1 (DCR1). Genomics 44, 237-241 [Medline]
NICHOLS C. G. & LOPATIN, A. N. (1997). Inwardly rectifying potassium channels. Annual Review of Physiology 59, 171-191 [Abstract/Full Text]
PEARSON W. L., DOURADO, M., SCHREIBER, M., SALKOFF, L. & NICHOLS, C. G. (1999). Expression of a functional Kir4 family inward rectifier K+ channel from a gene cloned from mouse liver. Journal of Physiology 514, 639-653 [Abstract/Full Text]
PESSIA M., TUCKER, S. J., LEE, K., BOND, C. T. & ADELMAN, J. P. (1996). Subunit positional effects revealed by novel heteromeric inwardly rectifying K+ channels. EMBO Journal 15, 2980-2987. [Abstract]
REIMANN F. & ASHCROFT, F. M. (1999). Inwardly rectifying potassium channels. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 11, 503-508 [Medline]
SALVATORE L., D'ADAMO, M. C., POLISHCHUK, R., SALMONA, M. & PESSIA, M. (1999). Localisation and age-dependent expression of the inward rectifier K+ channel subunit Kir5.1 in a mammalian reproductive system. FEBS Letters 449, 146-152 [Medline]
SCHULTE U., HAHN, H., KONRAD, M., JECK, N., DERST, C., WILD, K., WEIDEMANN, S., RUPPERSBERG, J. P., FAKLER, B. & LUDWIG, J. (1999). pH gating of ROMK (Kir1.1) channels: control by an Arg-Lys-Arg triad disrupted in antenatal Bartter syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96, 15298-15303 [Abstract/Full Text]
SCHULTE U., HAHN, H., WIESINGER, H., RUPPERSBERG, J. P. & FAKLER, B. (1998). pH-dependent Gating of ROMK (Kir1.1) channels involves conformational changes in both N and C termini. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 34575-34579 [Abstract/Full Text]
SHUCK M., PISER, T., BOCK, J., SLIGHTOM, J., LEE, K. & BIENKOWSKI, M. (1997). Cloning and characterization of two K+ inward rectifier (Kir)1.1 potassium channel homologs from human kidney (Kir1.1 and Kir1.3). Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, 586-593 [Abstract/Full Text]
TANEMOTO M., KITTAKA, N., INANOBE, A. & KURACHI, Y. (2000). In vivo formation of a proton-sensitive K+ channel by heteromeric subunit assembly of Kir5.1 with Kir4.1. Journal of Physiology 525, 587-592 [Abstract/Full Text]
TUCKER S. J. & ASHCROFT, F. M. (1999). Mapping of the physical interaction between the intracellular domains of an inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Kir6.2. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 33393-33397 [Abstract/Full Text]
TUCKER S. J., IMBRICI, P., SALVATORE, L., D'ADAMO, M. C. & PESSIA, M. (2000). pH dependence of the inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir5.1. and localization in renal tubular epithelia, Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 16404-16407 [Abstract/Full Text]
XU H., CUI, N., YANG, Z., QU, Z. & JIANG, C. (2000). Modulation of Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 by hypercapnia and intracellular acidosis. Journal of Physiology 524, 725-735 [Abstract/Full Text]
YANG Z. & JIANG, C. (1999). Opposite effects of pH on open-state probability and single channel conductance of Kir4.1. Journal of Physiology 520, 921-927 [Abstract/Full Text]
YANG Z., XU, H., CUI, N., QU, Z., CHANCHEVALAP, S., SHEN, W. & JIANG, C. (2000). Biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels by CO2 and pH. Journal of General Physiology 116, 33-45 [Abstract/Full Text]

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr W. Pearson (Washington University, St Louis, USA) for the kind gift of Kir4.2, and for financial support, The Wellcome Trust, the Royal Society, the Telethon (Italy, Grant no.1083) and the Italian National Research Council (Progetto Strategico). P.I. is the recipient of a fellowship from M.U.R.S.T. 'Corso Biennale per Esperto in Biotecnologie Applicate alla Ricerca Scientifica Biomedica'.

Corresponding author

M. Pessia: Department of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri', Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, 66030 Santa Maria Imbaro (Chieti), Italy.

Email: pessia{at}cmns.mnegri.it




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. E. Logothetis, D. Lupyan, and A. Rosenhouse-Dantsker
Diverse Kir modulators act in close proximity to residues implicated in phosphoinositide binding
J. Physiol., August 1, 2007; 582(3): 953 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
C. Huang, A. Sindic, C. E. Hill, K. M. Hujer, K. W. Chan, M. Sassen, Z. Wu, Y. Kurachi, S. Nielsen, M. F. Romero, et al.
Interaction of the Ca2+-sensing receptor with the inwardly rectifying potassium channels Kir4.1 and Kir4.2 results in inhibition of channel function
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): F1073 - F1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Su, Y. Ohno, C. Lossin, H. Hibino, A. Inanobe, and Y. Kurachi
Inhibition of Astroglial Inwardly Rectifying Kir4.1 Channels by a Tricyclic Antidepressant, Nortriptyline
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2007; 320(2): 573 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Nie, W. Feng, R. Diaz, M. A. Gratton, K. J. Doyle, and E. N. Yamoah
Functional Consequences of Polyamine Synthesis Inhibition by L-{alpha}-Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO): CELLULAR MECHANISMS FOR DFMO-MEDIATED OTOTOXICITY
J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 15097 - 15102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Wang, J. Su, X. Wang, H. Piao, X. Zhang, C. Y. Adams, N. Cui, and C. Jiang
Subunit Stoichiometry of the Kir1.1 Channel in Proton-dependent Gating
J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13433 - 13441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
D. A. Gray, G. Frindt, Y.-Y. Zhang, and L. G. Palmer
Basolateral K+ conductance in principal cells of rat CCD
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): F493 - F504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. C. Hebert, G. Desir, G. Giebisch, and W. Wang
Molecular Diversity and Regulation of Renal Potassium Channels
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2005; 85(1): 319 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R. W. Putnam, J. A. Filosa, and N. A. Ritucci
Cellular mechanisms involved in CO2 and acid signaling in chemosensitive neurons
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): C1493 - C1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. Tanemoto, T. Abe, T. Onogawa, and S. Ito
PDZ binding motif-dependent localization of K+ channel on the basolateral side in distal tubules
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): F1148 - F1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. V. Wu, M. E. Krouse, A. Rustagi, N. S. Joo, and J. J. Wine
An Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channel in Apical Membrane of Calu-3 Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 46558 - 46565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Hibino, A. Fujita, K. Iwai, M. Yamada, and Y. Kurachi
Differential Assembly of Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel Subunits, Kir4.1 and Kir5.1, in Brain Astrocytes
J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 44065 - 44073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Casamassima, M. C. D'Adamo, M. Pessia, and S. J. Tucker
Identification of a Heteromeric Interaction That Influences the Rectification, Gating, and pH Sensitivity of Kir4.1/Kir5.1 Potassium Channels
J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43533 - 43540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M. Ishii, A. Fujita, K. Iwai, S. Kusaka, K. Higashi, A. Inanobe, H. Hibino, and Y. Kurachi
Differential expression and distribution of Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 inwardly rectifying K+ channels in retina
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): C260 - C267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
N. Alagem, S. Yesylevskyy, and E. Reuveny
The Pore Helix Is Involved in Stabilizing the Open State of Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels
Biophys. J., July 1, 2003; 85(1): 300 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
A.-A. Konstas, C. Korbmacher, and S. J. Tucker
Identification of domains that control the heteromeric assembly of Kir5.1/Kir4.0 potassium channels
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): C910 - C917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Schulze, T. Krauter, H. Fritzenschaft, M. Soom, and T. Baukrowitz
Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate (PIP2) Modulation of ATP and pH Sensitivity in Kir Channels. A TALE OF AN ACTIVE AND A SILENT PIP2 SITE IN THE N TERMINUS
J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2003; 278(12): 10500 - 10505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Piao, N. Cui, H. Xu, J. Mao, A. Rojas, R. Wang, L. Abdulkadir, L. Li, J. Wu, and C. Jiang
Requirement of Multiple Protein Domains and Residues for Gating KATP Channels by Intracellular pH
J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2001; 276(39): 36673 - 36680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pessia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pessia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, S. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS