J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Erratum for Carabelli et al., J Physiol 532 (1) 73-90.
J Physiol Volume 533, Number 3, 922-, June 15, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Journal of Physiology (2001), 533.3, pp. 922-922
© Copyright 2001 The Physiological Society

ERRATA

Valentina Carabelli, Jesús M. Hernández-Guijo, Pietro Baldelli and Emilio Carbone

Journal of Physiology 532, 73-90 (2001)

In the printed version, on page 83, panels A and C of Fig. 8 were printed incorrectly.

The figure should have appeared as :

F8 View larger version
[in this window]
[in a new window]

Figure 8. cAMP removes the agonist-induced inhibition and potentiates the Bay K-modified L-channels

A, channel activity with high Po during consecutive depolarizations to +10 mV after incubation with 1 mM 8-CPT-cAMP (30 min) and in the presence of ATP and opioid agonists in the pipette; Vh -40 mV. The mean current to the bottom was calculated from 164 sweeps pooled from 16 patches. B, with ATP and opioids in the pipette the L-channel activity was low (top): mean Po was 0.13 and the nulls (indicated by spaces) were quite frequent (26 %). Following 8-CPT-cAMP (50 µM) incubation (with agonists in the pipette) Po increased to 0.30 and the percentage of nulls was reduced to 9 %. C, open and close time distributions at +10 mV derived from n = 164 sweeps pooled from 16 patches incubated with 1 mM 8-CPT-cAMP. Data were plotted on a square root-log binned histogram and fitted with two and three exponentials with the following values: 3.9 ms (86 %) and 11.7 ms (14 %) for to and 1.64 ms (71 %), 13.6 ms (21 %) and 61 ms (8 %) for tc. D-G, mean Po, null sweeps, mean to and tc at +10 mV in the presence of the agonists (27 patches), agonists + 1 mM cAMP (16 patches), agonists + cAMP + PTX (7 patches) and cAMP + antagonists (n = 10 patches) (** P < 0.01).





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS