| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Physiology (2002), 544.1, pp. 3-18
© Copyright 2002 The Physiological Society
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.020255
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TopAbstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
GABAA receptor fast desensitization is thought to shape the time course of individual IPSCs. Although GABAA receptors also exhibit slower phases of desensitization, the possible role of slow desensitization in modifying synaptic function is poorly understood. In transiently transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) cells, rat1
3
and
2L GABAA receptors showed distinct desensitization patterns during long (28 s) concentration jumps using a saturating (1 mM) GABA concentration.
1 ~20 ms,
(Received 8 March 2002; accepted after revision 1 July 2002; first published online 2 August 2002)
Corresponding author R. L. Macdonald: Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University, 2100 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN 37212, USA. Email: robert.macdonald{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Agonist-induced desensitization has been observed for many types of ligand-gated ion channels and may subserve diverse functions in vivo (Jones & Westbrook, 1996). GABAA receptor desensitization has been shown to be multiphasic, suggesting that multiple desensitized conformations are possible (Celentano & Wong, 1994; Haas & Macdonald, 1999). We previously investigated the desensitization patterns of and GABAA receptors (Haas & Macdonald, 1999), thought to comprise the majority of GABAA receptor isoforms in the brain (McKernan & Whiting, 1996). Both the rate and extent of desensitization were clearly dependent on subunit composition. For example, 132L receptors showed extensive desensitization that was described by a fast phase (~10 ms), an intermediate phase (~150 ms) and a slow phase (~1500 ms). In contrast, 13 receptors desensitized less extensively, with a single slow phase (~1500 ms) that resembled the slow phase of 132L receptor currents. Subunit-dependent desensitization, among other properties, may provide a molecular mechanism for regulating GABAA response efficacy during prolonged or repetitive activation.
The subcellular compartmentalization of GABAA receptors is also related to subunit composition. GABAA receptors containing the subunit have been shown to reside in extrasynaptic membrane locations in the cerebellum (Nusser et al. 1998). Extrasynaptic receptors may sense ambient extracellular levels of GABA that fluctuate over a much slower time scale than synaptic transients. The slow desensitization kinetics of isoforms are well suited for continuous response to sustained, low level GABA concentrations that may occur extracellularly (Lerma et al. 1986). In contrast, ternary receptors containing the subunits have been suggested to be predominantly localized to subsynaptic membranes (Nusser et al. 1998; Brickley et al. 1999). During individual synaptic events, fast desensitization is thought to shape the post synaptic current in part by prolonging its duration (a process known as receptor deactivation) by delaying the unbinding of GABA, although in principle all desensitized states share the property of trapping GABA on the receptor (Jones & Westbrook, 1995; Bianchi & Macdonald, 2001a). The rapid activation and desensitization kinetics of isoforms, thus, are well suited for responding to brief GABA transients during inhibitory synaptic transmission (Haas & Macdonald, 1999).
The role of intermediate and slow phases of desensitization for synaptic GABAA receptors is less clear. Slow desensitized states may not contribute to the shaping of individual IPSCs because equilibration occurs over a long time scale relative to the synaptic transient. However, persistent levels of GABA in the synaptic cleft are possible under certain conditions, such as spillover of GABA during high levels of activity (Isaacson et al. 1993; Rossi & Hamann, 1998). GABA spillover that reaches neighbouring inhibitory synapses is the equivalent of pre-incubation in low concentration GABA, which has been shown to desensitize GABAA receptors to subsequent pulses of saturating GABA (Overstreet et al. 2000). This prolonged exposure to GABA may promote entry into the slow phases of desensitization.
Slow phases of desensitization may also be involved in GABAA receptor responsiveness under conditions of repetitive receptor activation. Such conditions may occur during pathological states such as epilepsy, or during normal rhythmic network firing patterns. With exogenous application of GABA, even brief pulses can drive GABAA receptors into desensitized states, such that subsequent GABA applications evoke smaller amplitude currents. When repeated IPSCs are evoked, the decrement in synaptic current is often attributed to pre-synaptic mechanisms (Davies & Collingridge, 1993; Stevens & Wang, 1995). However, it is difficult to quantify post-synaptic receptor desensitization; if GABAA receptors can accumulate in slowly equilibrating desensitized states during repetitive stimulation, this may also constrain synaptic efficacy. Although dissecting the impact of postsynaptic receptor desensitization is complicated by the known presynaptic contributions to synaptic depression, recombinant systems employing exogenous GABA application allow direct testing of the hypothesis that slow phases of desensitization can regulate GABAA receptor availability during repeated applications of GABA.
In this study we used a chimera strategy to identify structures that conferred the distinct desensitization patterns of GABAA receptors containing or 2L subunits. Interestingly, two distinct domains of the subunit were shown to be responsible for its unique desensitization pattern. The absence of the fast and intermediate phases of desensitization was dependent upon N-terminal and TM1 sequence, while TM2 sequence regulated the contribution of the slower phases of desensitization. Additionally, we took advantage of chimeric constructs that showed slow but extensive desensitization to explore the possible role of slow desensitization in synaptic function. Progressive inhibition of peak current during pulse trains suggested that accumulation of receptors in slowly equilibrating desensitized states might contribute to decreased synaptic efficacy during repeated receptor activation.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Expression of recombinant GABAA receptors
The cDNAs encoding rat 1, 3, and 2L, GABAAR subunit subtypes and chimera subunits were individually subcloned into the plasmid expression vector pCMVNeo. See Bianchi et al. (2001) for construction of chimeras and splice site locations. All constructs have been confirmed by DNA sequencing (Sequencing Core, University of Michigan, MI, USA). Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T; a gift from P. Connely, COR Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, USA) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum, at 37 °C in 5 % CO2-95 % air. Cells were transfected with 4 µg of each subunit plasmid along with 1-2 µg of pHOOK (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for immunomagnetic bead separation (Greenfield et al. 1997), using a modified calcium phosphate co-precipitation technique as previously described (Angelotti et al. 1993). The next day, cells were replated and recordings were made 18-30 h later.
Electrophysiology
Patch-clamp recordings were performed on transfected fibroblasts bathed in an external solution consisting of (mM): NaCl 142; KCl 8; MgCl2 6; CaCl2 1; Hepes 10; glucose 10 (pH 7.4, 325 mosmol l-1). Electrodes were formed from thin-walled borosilicate glass (World Precision Instruments, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) with a Flaming Brown electrode puller (Sutter Instrument Co., San Rafael, CA, USA), fire-polished to resistances of 0.8-1.5 M
when filled with an internal solution consisting of (mM): KCl 153; MgCl2 1; MgATP 2; Hepes 10; EGTA 5 (pH 7.3, 300 mosmol l-1). This combination of internal and external solutions produced a chloride equilibrium potential near 0 mV. Cells were voltage clamped at -10 to -60 mV using an Axopatch 200A amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA). No voltage dependence of desensitization was observed in this range. For isoforms exhibiting 'fast' desensitization, cells were gently lifted from the recording dish to reduce the solution exchange time. For isoforms without fast desensitization, we observed insignificant differences in fitting the desensitization whether cells were lifted or not (despite faster current rise times upon lifting), and thus data from the two conditions were pooled. GABA was applied (via gravity) to whole cells using a rapid perfusion system consisting of multi-barrel square glass connected to a Warner Perfusion Fast-Step (Warner Instrument Corp., Hamden, CT, USA). The glass was pulled to a final barrel size of approximately 250 µm. The solution exchange time was estimated routinely by stepping a dilute external solution across the open electrode tip to measure a liquid junction current. The 10-90 % rise times for solution exchange were consistently 1-2 ms or less, although the exchange around cells was probably slower.
Analysis of currents
Currents were low-pass filtered at 2-5 kHz, digitized at 10 kHz, and analysed using the pCLAMP8 software suite (Axon Instruments). The desensitization time courses of GABAAR currents were fit using the Levenberg-Marquardt least squares method with one, two, three or four component exponential functions of the form 
ane(-t/n), where n is the best number of exponential components, a is the relative amplitude of the component, t is time and is the time constant. Additional components were accepted only if they significantly improved the fit, as determined by an F test automatically performed by the analysis software on the sum of squared residuals. Five component fits were not considered. Numerical data were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical significance, using Student's t test (unpaired) was taken as P < 0.05.
Simulations
Simulated macroscopic currents were generated using the Berkeley Madonna 8.0 software package (www.berkeleymadonna.com) that numerically solves differential equations (4th order Runge-Kutta algorithm, 100 µs step size for all simulations shown).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Desensitization of 132L and 13 GABAA receptors differed in both rate and extent
There was a clear subunit dependence of GABAA receptor desensitization (Fig. 1). Lifted cells expressing 132L (Fig. 1A) or 13 (Fig. 1C) GABAA receptors were activated by GABA (1 mM) for 28 s using the concentration jump technique. 132L receptor currents desensitized rapidly and extensively (91.1 ± 1.1 %), with a time course that was best described by four exponential functions that we will refer to as fast, intermediate, slow and ultraslow phases of desensitization (Fig. 1B). In contrast to 132L receptors, 13 receptor desensitization was slow, accounted for only 38.1 ± 4.4 % current loss over 28 s and was well described by one (or sometimes two) exponential functions (Fig. 1D and E). The measured time constants for 13 receptors were similar to the slow and ultraslow phases of desensitization of 132L receptor currents. Longer duration pulses would be required to determine whether additional, slower phases of desensitization exist. Figure 1E showed the accuracy of multi-exponential fitting for the rapidly desensitizing 132L current. The exponential functions are superimposed on the trace, and the residual current (actual current - fitted curve) is shown above the trace. Minimal deviations of the residual current were observed, except for the first 30 ms of the trace, which may have contributed to the variation of the fast time constant (Fig. 1E2).
 |
View larger version [in this window] [in a new window] |
|
|
Figure 1. A, current response of transiently expressed | ||
While excised patches have proven optimal for studying fast desensitization (Haas & Macdonald, 1999; Bianchi et al. 2001), whole cells offered two major advantages over patches for the study of slow desensitization. First, we found that the whole cell configuration provided considerably greater stability during the long duration GABA applications required to resolve slow phases of desensitization. Second, whole cell currents were typically much larger than patch currents, allowing accurate fitting of slow phases even after substantial current loss during many seconds of GABA exposure. The small current amplitudes typically remaining after even a few seconds of GABA application to patches may compromise fitting accuracy due to low signal to noise ratio. Nevertheless, two important considerations warranted further investigation to ensure that the whole cell configuration was appropriate for our study of slow desensitization. In the following sections we evaluated the potential contribution of chloride ion shifts to macroscopic desensitization and compared desensitization in whole cell and patch configurations.
Chloride ion redistribution did not account for the time course of desensitization
One difficulty in studying slow phases of desensitization is the requirement for unusually long agonist applications. It has been suggested that chloride ion shifts accounted in part for the fading of current during prolonged (on the scale of minutes) agonist applications (Akaike et al. 1987). For example, at hyperpolarized holding potentials, chloride ion efflux during the GABA application might drive the equilibrium potential for chloride (ECl) to negative potentials (it is normally near 0 mV using our solutions; see Methods), such that the driving force would decrease with time. This would lead to spurious overestimations of apparent desensitization. Despite the use of low resistance electrodes (that more easily dialyse internal solution into the cell cytoplasm to buffer chloride ion efflux), the possibility of chloride ion shifts needed to be addressed directly. Although the expression level (as reflected in current amplitude) of transfected GABAA receptors differed widely among individual cells, it was not uncommon to measure current amplitudes in the 5-15 nA range, particularly for the 132L receptors. Therefore we conducted control experiments using 132L receptors to determine whether potential redistribution of chloride ion could be affecting our measurements of desensitization. If significant chloride ion shifts were occurring over the course of GABA application, then the ECl would change as the time of GABA application increased. We repeatedly applied GABA (1 mM) for 10 s at various holding potentials and measured the current amplitude at the peak, middle (5 s) and end (10 s) of the response (Fig. 2A). We used shorter application durations for these experiments because most of the desensitization observed in 28 s pulses occurred by ~10 s, and cell stability was more robust for the required repeated GABA applications. Three cells that showed large current amplitudes (5-15 nA at -50 mV holding potential) were chosen for analysis. This protocol provided three I-V curves for each cell. The data from a representative I-V experiment (Fig. 2A) was plotted in Fig. 2B. Although this particular cell showed slight outward rectification at +50 mV, other cells showed no, or slight inward, rectification. Any change in the relative chloride ion concentration over the course of the application would be revealed as a change in the reversal potential. Chloride ion redistribution would also result in non-linearities of the I-V relations measured at different points during the 10 s application, which is theoretically ohmic (and thus linear), assuming no voltage-dependent gating. In excised patches (where chloride ion shifts were not relevant because of the small currents and large chloride ion reservoirs on both sides of the membrane), desensitization of 132L receptor currents showed minimal apparent voltage dependence between -75 and +50 mV (data not shown). We did not observe any non-linearity of the relation (Fig. 2B), and there was no significant change in reversal potential (Fig. 2C). To rule out the possibility that series resistance errors (that were not compensated in this study) affected the I-V experiment, we measured the reversal potential in three cells (that had large conductance changes in response to GABA) in which the series resistance was compensated by 85-90 % (Fig. 2C). ECl was not different when measured at the peak or 5 s later and was not different from that calculated without compensation. In Fig. 2D the relative charge transfer occurring over the course of a 28 s application from five randomly chosen 132L receptor current traces was plotted. The cumulative charge carried at 10 s was over 700 times greater than that carried by the time the peak was reached (< 5 ms). Despite this large difference in chloride flux, no evidence was found for significant redistribution of chloride ions in our experiments. Although series resistance errors may alter both the extent and the kinetics of desensitization (for example, the larger voltage error at the peak current would decrease the 'true' peak value and thus lead to underestimation of desensitization extent), we did not investigate these effects. However, neither the time constants of desensitization nor their relative contributions to the decay were correlated with conductance for the rapidly desensitizing 132L receptor currents (Fig. 2E1 and E2).
 |
View larger version [in this window] [in a new window] |
|
|
Figure 2. Chloride shifts were not responsible for the fading of current during prolonged GABA application A, currents were evoked by 10 s applications of 1 mM GABA to | ||
Comparison of GABAA receptor desensitization in excised patches and in whole cells using various perfusion techniques
The concentration jump technique has been used to demonstrate rapid, multiphasic desensitization in excised patches containing native (Celentano & Wong, 1994) and recombinant (Haas & Macdonald, 1999) GABAA receptors, as well as nucleated patches from cerebellum (Tia et al. 1996). However, desensitization was usually slower when observed at the whole cell level, even with relatively rapid perfusion (for example, see Dominguez-Perrot et al. 1997). One concern with comparisons of desensitization between the whole cell and excised patch configurations was that channel behaviour might be altered if patch excision disrupts interactions with cytoplasmic factors. For example, phosphorylation and interactions with clustering proteins are known to affect GABAA receptor function (Jones & Westbrook, 1997; Chen et al. 2000). However, it was also possible that the differences were related to the technical limitations in perfusing whole cells on a time scale sufficiently rapid to resolve fast processes. To test this possibility, we quantified the time constant and relative contribution of 'fast' desensitization, as well as the current rise time, for rapidly desensitizing 132L receptor currents evoked by GABA (1 mM) under various conditions of perfusion efficiency (Fig. 3). The slowest perfusion technique we investigated was a commonly used Y-tube apparatus (Fig. 3A), with exchange times of 70-150 ms measured at an open electrode tip (Greenfield & Macdonald 1996). Currents required ~100 ms to reach peak, and subsequent desensitization was fitted with time constants in the range of 1000 ms (not shown). A motor driven 'stepper' that switches solutions by rapidly translating parallel flow pipes across a cell (Warner Instruments, see methods) provided much faster exchange times, with open tip measurements in the range of 1-2 ms (with faster exchange possible using increased solution flow rates). When GABA was applied using this technique, current rise times (10-90 %) were 7.3 ± 0.8 ms (Fig. 3B and E). Also, a fast component of desensitization could be resolved with relatively small amplitude and time constant of 31.8 ± 2.0 ms (Fig. 3F and G). The efficiency and speed of solution exchange around whole cells could be further improved by gently lifting the cell from the culture dish (Bianchi & Macdonald, 2001a). In this configuration (Fig. 3C), the current rise time was decreased to 1.7 ± 0.1 ms, and the first component of desensitization was both faster and of greater proportion (Fig. 3C and F). (Note that the current rise time was not a measure of solution exchange time because activation reflects agonist binding and channel gating, and desensitization curtailed the peak current.) Finally, using excised patches and optimized solution exchange times of 0.2-0.4 ms, we observed rise times of 0.55 ± 0.04 ms (Fig. 3D), along with a fast desensitization time constant of 6.0 ± 0.7 ms, which had a greater relative amplitude (Fig. 3D and G). The extent of apparent desensitization was also sensitive to application method (compare Fig. 3A-D), with greater apparent desensitization observed with faster application methods. This was probably accounted for by failure to reach the 'true' peak (from which the extent of desensitization is measured) with slower applications. Although 'back-extrapolation' has been used to correct for this failure to reach peak current, such manipulations cannot account for missed currents that decay with time constants that are near to or less than the time of current activation. The extrapolation process assumes that the portion of the time course available for measurement is an accurate representation of the process in question (i.e. fast desensitization). In other words, if the fast time constant is blunted by slow GABA application, the extrapolation will underestimate the 'true' peak. Figure 3H demonstrates the effects of back extrapolating a typical excised patch current using various fitting windows.
 |
View larger version [in this window] [in a new window] |
|
|
Figure 3. Comparison of activation and fast desensitization among various perfusion techniques Representative currents were obtained from | ||
Although the results did not exclude the importance of intracellular factors or address their intactness following patch excision, they suggested that the differences in desensitization between receptors measured in whole cells and excised patches may have been accounted for in large part by the physical limitations in solution exchange times relative to the rapid channel kinetics of this type of GABAA receptor. Further support for this idea came from our observation that the pattern of desensitization of slowly desensitizing isoforms (such as for 13 receptors) was similar between intact, lifted and excised patch techniques, despite clear differences in current activation time (not shown). Despite our observation that fast processes, such as current activation and fast desensitization, were somewhat compromised by solution exchange limitations in whole cells (compared to patches), we concluded that the lifted cell mode was nevertheless appropriate for investigation of processes, such as the slower phases of desensitization, that equilibrated with slower time constants and were therefore less sensitive to solution exchange efficiency.
Structural determinants of multiphasic desensitization explored with -2L chimeras
To investigate the subunit structural domains responsible for the distinct desensitization of 13 and 132L receptor currents, we tested a series of chimeras that contained subunit sequence in the N-terminal extracellular domain spliced at various points within the first two transmembrane domains to 2L subunit sequence. Each chimera was expressed with 1 and 3 subunits and responses were recorded during 28 s applications of GABA (1 mM) (Fig. 4). Wild-type responses from Fig. 1 were shown again in Fig. 4A (132L) and Fig. 4F (13) for comparison. The first chimera, containing subunit sequence only in the N-terminus (M1e; Fig. 4B1), did not alter the pattern of desensitization, which still occurred with four phases of similar time constants (Fig. 4B2), and reached a mean current loss of 87.2 ± 1.9 % in the 28 s GABA application. The next chimera, M1pre-iso, contained two additional subunit residues moving the splice junction into transmembrane domain 1 (TM1) (Fig. 4C1). Using 400 ms pulses of GABA (1 mM) to excised patches, we previously showed that this chimera differed from M1e in that it blocked the fast phase of desensitization (Bianchi et al. 2001). Indeed, lifted cells expressing this chimera lacked the fast phase of desensitization. However, only two slow time constants of desensitization were resolved, with similar time constants to 3 and 4 observed in 132L, indicating that this chimera in fact lacked both the fast and intermediate phases of desensitization (Fig. 4C2). Despite the absence of these two desensitization phases, the currents nevertheless desensitized extensively (70.8 ± 2.7 %). Increasing the contribution of subunit sequence to include all of TM1 (M1i chimera) did not change desensitization; the extent of desensitization and its biphasic pattern was not different from that observed for the M1pre-iso chimera (62.0 ± 2.8 %; Fig. 4D1 and D2). However, extending subunit sequence to include TM2 clearly altered the extent of desensitization (41.3 ± 3.0 %; Fig. 4E1). Desensitization of the M2e chimera was indistinguishable from wild-type 13 receptor desensitization, except that it was always monoexponential (whereas 5 out of 10 13 currents decayed biphasically), with a time constant resembling 4 (Fig. 4D2). These observations strongly implicated TM2 in the regulation of slow desensitization.
 |
View larger version [in this window] [in a new window] |
|
|
Figure 4. Structural determinants of desensitization explored through A1-F1, the subunit construct is shown in schematic form (left) with N-terminus to the left, and transmembrane domains represented by boxes. Open portions of the schematics indicate | ||
We subsequently examined the desensitization of GABAA receptors containing or 2L subunits in which the four divergent TM2 residues were replaced by 2L or subunit sequence, respectively (Fig. 5). Replacing the TM2 with 2L sequence clearly increased the extent of desensitization to 68.3 ± 1.3 %, significantly greater than 13 desensitization (38.1 ± 4.4 %) (Fig. 5A). The rate and extent of desensitization of (M2S) (Fig. 5B) was indistinguishable from M1pre-iso. This result suggested that the 2L sequence in TM2 accounted for all of the observed desensitization in that chimera, which contained 2L sequence in all of the transmembrane domains, except for the first two residues of TM1. Mutating subsets of the subunit TM2 to 2L sequence did not significantly change desensitization compared to wild-type (not shown). Having shown that sequence in TM2 was necessary to decrease the extent of slow desensitization, we then tested whether it was sufficient. The reverse swap, with sequence introduced into TM2 of the 2L subunit, had minimal impact on the pattern of desensitization (Fig. 5C and D). The extent of desensitization was slightly, but significantly, less for 2L(M2S) (86.0 ± 1.7 compared to 91.1 ± 1.1 %). A summary of the desensitization extent is shown in Fig. 6 for comparison among the isoforms tested.
 |
View larger version [in this window] [in a new window] |
|
|
Figure 5. A, current response of | ||
 |
View larger version [in this window] [in a new window] |
|
|
Figure 6. Summary of desensitization extent during 28 s applications of 1 mM GABA Extent of desensitization was measured for each isoform as the following percentage: (peak current - current at offset of GABA)/peak current. * Significant difference compared to both | ||
Possible role of slow desensitization for inhibitory synaptic transmission
Previous studies have suggested that GABAA receptor deactivation following brief agonist pulses (to mimic IPSC time course) was selectively shaped by fast desensitization; simulations suggested that slower phases had little or no effect on deactivation (Jones & Westbrook, 1995; Haas & Macdonald, 1999). Few studies have investigated the role of intermediate or slow phases of desensitization on channel function. Overstreet et al. (2000) demonstrated that persistent low concentrations of GABA decreased IPSC amplitude, and suggested that persistent low GABA concentrations favoured slow desensitization (which limited synaptic receptor availability). The model proposed by Haas & Macdonald (1999) also predicted inhibition of peak currents by pre-incubation with a similar IC50 to that reported by Overstreet et al. (2000) (~2 µM; not shown), although occupancy of all three desensitized states (fast, intermediate and slow), contributed significantly to the inhibition. Our model supposes that all three proposed desensitized states are accessible only to the di-liganded receptor, in contrast to the model of Jones & Westbrook (1995). Multiphasic desensitization during the continued presence of saturating GABA has been demonstrated for both native and recombinant GABAA receptors (Celentano & Wong, 1994; Dominguez-Perot et al. 1997; Tia et al. 1996; Mellor & Randall, 1998; Haas & Macdonald, 1999; this study), indicating that slow desensitized states must be available to the fully liganded receptor. Therefore, to begin investigating the possible roles of specific desensitized states in GABAA receptor function, we conducted simulations using our comprehensive kinetic model that accounted for both single channel and macroscopic behaviour of 132L receptor currents across a range of GABA concentrations and application durations (Fig. 7A; Haas & Macdonald, 1999). Note that the longest application of GABA used to generate this model was 4 s, and thus the ultraslow phase of desensitization detected in the present study (t ~10 s) was not observed. A simulated current response to a prolonged GABA application was plotted in Fig. 7B, along with the probabilities of being in any of the three desensitized states. The multiphasic pattern of current loss reflected equilibration among the three desensitized states. The model response to a simulated 10 Hz train of 2 ms GABA pulses (1 mM) was plotted in Fig. 7C1, with the probabilities of occupying the three desensitized states given above the trace. Strong inhibition of subsequent GABA applications was observed. However, slower phases of desensitization were accumulating during the train, while the occupancy of the fast desensitization state (Df) was decreasing. Setting the entry rate constant into Df to zero altered the time course of inhibition during the train, but extensive current loss occurred nevertheless, as receptors accumulated in the slower desensitization states (Fig. 7C2). An additional prediction of fully liganded slow desensitization states was that for a given inter-pulse interval, the inhibition observed in the second response would be sensitive to the duration of the first pulse. In other words, when the first pulse was brief, occupancy of rapidly equilibrating states was favoured, such as Df. For a pair of 2 ms GABA pulses separated by 800 ms, the small amount of inhibition of the second pulse was accounted almost entirely by residual occupancy of the slower desensitized states (Fig. 7D1). As predicted, if the duration of the first pulse was increased to 200 ms, allowing additional time to equilibrate in the slower desensitized states, greater inhibition was observed in the second pulse (800 ms later) (Fig. 7D2). Again, this inhibition was accounted for by occupancy of the slow desensitized states, while Df occupancy was near zero. Finally, we tested the effect of smaller increases in the pulse duration of simulated pulse trains on occupancy of the three desensitized states. Increasing the pulse durations from 2 to 20 ms revealed a small increase in occupancy of the desensitized states (Fig. 7E). This simulation was important for the following experimental section, in which pulse trains were delivered to whole cells, requiring longer pulse durations due to perfusion limitations.
 |
View larger version [in this window] [in a new window] |
|
|
Figure 7. Simulations predict a role for slow phases of desensitization during repetitive stimulation A, the kinetic model presented by Haas & Macdonald (1999) to account for single channel gating and macroscopic currents for | ||
Although the models provided a theoretical framework for understanding the role of specific desensitized states in GABAA receptor function, we sought a model-independent test of the prediction that the slow phases of desensitization were relevant for GABAA receptor inhibition during repeated GABA applications. Several receptors with chimeric subunits were observed to desensitize extensively despite the absence of the fast and intermediate phases of desensitization (namely M1i, M1pre-iso and (M2S)). These receptors provided the functional equivalent of setting the entry rate constants into the fast and intermediate desensitized states to zero. We delivered trains of GABA (1 mM) applications that varied in duration and frequency. Although the individual pulses delivered to whole cells were, for technical reasons, longer than the likely duration of synaptic transients (~1 ms), they were a reasonable approximation and not likely to significantly increase entry into slower desensitized states compared to brief pulses (see simulation, Fig. 7E). The responses of 132L receptors to trains of 10 ms pulses delivered at intervals of 100, 200, 500 or 2000 ms are presented in Fig. 8A. The extensive inhibition observed with 100 ms intervals (left trace) was gradually diminished as the interval was increased (next three traces). Intervals of 8 s or longer were required to completely eliminate depression (not shown). For the 2000 ms interval, we also tested 200 ms GABA pulse durations (right trace). Longer pulses favoured equilibration in slower phases of desensitization. Although little desensitization accumulated for brief GABA pulses when the interval was 2000 ms, when the duration of each GABA application was increased to 200 ms, inhibition was observed. Similar results were found in three other cells. Figure 8B shows current responses obtained from a cell expressing 13(M2S) using a similar train protocol. Inhibition was observed for 20 ms GABA pulses delivered every 100 ms (left trace), suggesting that fast and intermediate desensitized states were not solely responsible for the decreased current during repetitive stimulation. The extent of inhibition was decreased with increasing intervals (next three traces). Inhibition was then observed to increase for the 2000 ms interval when the GABA application duration was increased to 200 ms, similar to the results obtained with the rapidly desensitizing 132L receptors. Similar results were obtained from four other cells (expressing either M1pre-iso or (M2S)). Figure 8C shows the lack of inhibition observed with repetitive stimulation of 13 receptors, even with pulse durations of 1000 ms delivered at 1200 ms intervals (middle trace). This was expected based on the minimal extent of desensitization observed during a continuous 28 s GABA (1 mM) application for this cell (right trace).
 |
View larger version [in this window] [in a new window] |
|
|
Figure 8. Fast desensitization is not required for inhibition during repetitive stimulation A, current responses of | ||
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
We employed chimeras between the and 2L subunits of the GABAA receptor to investigate the structural determinants of the slow components of multiphasic desensitization. Long duration GABA applications (28 s) permitted resolution of four phases of desensitization for 132L receptors (fast, intermediate, slow and ultraslow), whereas 13 receptor currents exhibited only two phases with time constants similar to the slow and ultraslow phases observed for 132L receptors. -2L chimeras indicated that distinct domains of the subunit were responsible for blocking the fast and intermediate phases of desensitization and regulating the contribution of the slow phases. Additionally, we demonstrated that slow phases of desensitization might play an important role in synaptic function under conditions of repetitive GABAA receptor activation.
Interpretation of macroscopic desensitization patterns
Using the concentration jump technique applied to excised patches, we previously showed that 132L receptors desensitized with three phases during a 4 s application of 1 mM GABA (1 ~10 ms, 2 ~150 ms, 3 ~1500 ms), while 13 receptor desensitization was dominated by a slow phase of ~1500 ms (Haas & Macdonald, 1999). Using longer (28 s) applications to whole cells, we now report four phases of desensitization for 132L and two phases of desensitization for 13 receptors that corresponded to the slow and ultraslow phases (3 and 4) of 132L receptor desensitization. The similar time constants 3 and 4 suggested that similar slow desensitized states were common to both isoforms, but that the overall desensitization extent was less in the 13 receptor. The subunit appeared to constrain the desensitization of GABAA receptors in two ways: by blocking entry into the fast and intermediate desensitized states (that account for 1 and 2), and by decreasing the overall extent of desensitization (accounted for by the remaining slow and ultraslow phases).
Because the extent of desensitization is determined by the relative occupancy of open and desensitized states, it is possible that differences in open state stability might actually be responsible for the desensitization patterns observed in this study. Increasing open state occupancy, or decreasing desensitized state occupancy, will lead to a decreased rate and extent of desensitization. For example, we have previously demonstrated that increased gating efficacy accounted for the significantly decreased rate and extent of apparent desensitization of 132L(L9'S) receptors (Bianchi & Macdonald, 2001b). It is unlikely that such a phenomenon accounts for the distinct desensitization of 13 and 132L isoforms because their desensitization is the opposite of that predicted based on differences in gating efficacy alone. 13 receptors have been shown to exhibit brief and infrequent openings, even under conditions of maximal activation by high GABA concentration (1 mM) (Fisher & Macdonald, 1997; Haas & Macdonald, 1999), and yet desensitization is minimal. In contrast, 132L receptors have much higher gating efficacy, yet their desensitization is rapid and extensive.
Several constructs exhibited desensitization patterns that were intermediate between those observed with 13 and 132L receptors. For the reasons stated above, we concluded that the increased extent of desensitization relative to 13 receptors (through greater contributions of the two slow phases) observed for receptors containing constructs such as M1pre-iso, M1i and (M2S) (see Fig. 4) was indeed due to changes in the relative occupancy of slowly equilibrating desensitized states and not a secondary effect of decreasing open state stability. However, single channel analysis of these chimeras would be required to rule out the possibility that receptors containing these constructs had compromised gating efficacy compared to 13 receptors.
The association of high efficacy gating and rapid desensitization for 132L receptors (and the lack of either phenomena in 13 receptors) raised the possibility that the processes are structurally linked. Previously, Naranjo & Brehm (1993) demonstrated that subunit switches in the nAChR resulted in a concomitant alteration of gating and desensitization properties. Further structure-function analysis at both macroscopic and single channel levels should reveal additional information about the interrelatedness of open and desensitized states.
Structural determinants of desensitization
Although TM2 contains most of the channel lining residues (Xu & Akabas, 1996), the physical nature of the channel gate, and the manner in which desensitization occludes chloride ion conduction, remain poorly understood. Electron micrograph analysis of the Torpedo nAChR has led to the suggestion that the channel gate resides in the middle of TM2 (Unwin, 1995). However, the accessibility of engineered cysteines near the cytoplasmic end of TM2 to extracellularly applied sulfhydryl reagents suggested a deeper location of the gate (Wilson & Karlin, 1998). Structural insights into desensitized conformations are even less clear. A presumably desensitized state induced by a pulse of high concentration of acetylcholine just prior to freezing the membranes indicated structural changes in the transmembrane domains as well as the extracellular N-terminus (Unwin, 1995). There are also several mutation studies that suggested the importance of various TM1 and TM2 residues in desensitization of GABAA receptors and other related ligand-gated ion channels (Revah et al. 1991; Yakel et al. 1993; Im et al. 1995; Labarca et al. 1995; Lynch et al. 1997; Dalziel et al. 2000). Involvement of transmembrane domains in desensitization may suggest a distinct mechanism from glutamate-gated AMPA receptors, in which desensitization appears to be under the control of extracellular ligand binding domains (Stern-Bach et al. 1998; Banke et al. 2001).
Using the same set of -2L chimeras shown in this study, we previously reported that the fast phase of desensitization was blocked by -subunit sequence in the N-terminus and adjacent TM1 residues (Bianchi et al. 2001). However, the short duration GABA pulses used in that study (400 ms) were insufficient to accurately resolve slower phases of desensitization. We now extend the role of subunit N-terminus and adjacent TM1 residues to include block of the intermediate phase of desensitization. However, slow phases still accounted for extensive desensitization in chimeras that contained subunit sequence in the N-terminus and TM1 (M1pre-iso, M1i). Only when subunit sequence was extended to include TM2 (M2e chimera) was desensitization similar to that observed for 13 receptor currents. Notably, the importance of subunit sequence in TM1 and TM2 for regulating desensitization patterns was dependent on subunit sequence in the N-terminus. Introducing subunit sequence into TM2 of the 2L subunit had only minimal effects on desensitization (this study), and the TM1 residues identified by the M1pre-iso chimera were insufficient to block fast desensitization (Bianchi et al. 2001). In contrast, mutation of subunit residues in TM1 (Bianchi et al. 2001) or TM2 (this study) to 2L residues increased desensitization. This structural 'asymmetry' may suggest that multiple subunit domains are required to constrain GABAA receptor desensitization. Mutation of a subset of domains can compromise the minimal desensitization phenotpye of receptors, while introducing subsets of the subunit into the 2L subunit was insufficient to alter desensitization. Additional chimeras will clarify domains of the -subunit N-terminus that are required (in combination with the transmembrane domains) for regulation of desensitization.
Our results indicated that separate subunit domains modulated the presence of fast and intermediate phases, and the contribution of slow and ultraslow phases of desensitization. This would be consistent with two distinct desensitization 'gates', one of which operates on a relatively fast time scale (tens to hundreds of milliseconds), and the other on a slower time scale (one to tens of seconds). However, it is also possible that the multiple desensitized states inferred from macroscopic current measurements reflect different conformations of a single structure that can be modulated separately through TM1 and TM2. In this regard, it is interesting that TM1 and TM2 may be interleaved at their extracellular ends, based on data obtained from cysteine scanning mutagenesis (Akabas et al. 1994; Akabas & Karlin, 1995). Either way, it remains unknown whether the collapse of the conduction pore during desensitization involves alternative conformations of the activation gate, or a physically separate structure. It is also possible that some forms of desensitization (such as the slow phases that depended on TM2 sequence) involve stable closed conformations of the channel gate, while others operate through distinct structures.
A possible role of slow desensitization for inhibitory synaptic function
The model proposed by Jones & Westbrook (1995) predicted that slow desensitization of GABAA receptors was accessible in the monoliganded state and therefore relevant only for slowly developing, low concentration GABA transients. Although we cannot rule out monoliganded, desensitized states, there is clear evidence for multiple phases of desensitization in native and recombinant GABAA receptors. With the assumption that there are minimal monoliganded receptors during application of 1 mM GABA, there must be at least four desensitized states accessible in the fully liganded receptor, one to account for each time constant of desensitization. We have previously developed a model that incorporated slow desensitized states that are accessible to the fully liganded receptor (Haas & Macdonald, 1999). Simulations using this model suggested that although Df is the most relevant desensitized state for brief transients (similar to the model of Jones & Westbrook), in fact the slower desensitized states (Di and Ds) accumulate during repetitive brief GABA pulses, accounting for the progressive loss of current. Repetitive applications of GABA resulted in pronounced inhibition of GABAA receptor currents that showed extensive desensitization, independent of the presence of fast and intermediate phases of desensitization (Fig. 8A and B). This strongly suggested that slow desensitized states could accumulate under conditions of repeated activation, even with brief pulses of GABA. Paired pulse protocols and trains of high frequency stimulation result in depression of IPSC amplitude (Davies et al. 1990; Galarreta & Hestrin, 1998; Jiang et al. 2000; Bartos et al. 2001). Presynaptic mechanisms related to vesicular release have been demonstrated (Davies & Collingridge, 1993; Stevens & Wang, 1995). Also, shifts in the postsynaptic chloride equilibrium potential have been detected during repetitive firing (McCarren & Alger, 1985; Thomson & Gahwiler, 1989). However, few studies of synaptic GABAA receptors have identified desensitization as a mechanism for depressed responses with repeated GABAA receptor activation (Alger, 1991). Our results indicated that accumulation in slow desensitized states might represent an additional post-synaptic mechanism. Note that the extension of any results obtained with recombinant receptors assumes that native receptors behave in a similar fashion. Although this has not been explicitly proven, recombinant GABAA receptors exhibit many pharmacological and kinetic properties (desensitization, deactivation, single channel kinetics) of native receptors (reviewed in Olsen & Macdonald, 2002).
It has been suggested that non-desensitizing receptors would be ideally suited for sustained responsiveness to extrasynaptic GABA (Saxena & Macdonald, 1994; Nusser et al. 1998; Haas & Macdonald, 1999). However, sustained responses are also possible from 132L receptors. Although desensitization was rapid and extensive, it was never complete on the time scale we examined (28 s). The currents were typically larger than those observed for 13 receptors, so that even after 90 % current loss over 28 s there was still significant current remaining (hundreds of picoamps). 13 receptors did not desensitize extensively during the long applications, but they had smaller peak currents on average, so that the current remaining was also in the hundreds of picoamps range. The basis for this large difference in current size may be related to differences in expression level, or gating efficacy, which is considerably greater for 132L receptors (Fisher & Macdonald, 1997; Haas & Macdonald, 1999). Whatever the basis may be, if the difference persisted in a neuronal environment, extrasynaptic 132L receptors might be able to contribute sustained membrane currents despite significant desensitization. There is evidence for isoforms in extrasynaptic membranes (Nusser et al. 1998; Brickley et al. 1999). Also, less apparent desensitization is observed in 132L receptors currents evoked by low agonist concentrations (Celentano & Wong, 1994; Haas & Macdonald, 1999). Thus, tonic inhibition resulting from prolonged GABA exposure may not be strictly limited to non-desensitizing isoforms.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
| AKABAS, M. H. & KARLIN, A. (1995). Identification of acetylcholine receptor channel-lining residues in the M1 segment of the -subunit. Biochemistry 34, 12496-12500 |
[Medline] |
| AKABAS, M. H., KAUFMANN, C., ARCHDEACON, P. & KARLIN, A. (1994). Identification of acetylcholine receptor channel-lining residues in the entire M2 segment of the alpha subunit. Neuron 13, 919-927 | [Medline] |
| AKAIKE, N., INOMATA, N. & TOKUTOMI, N. (1987). Contribution of chloride shifts to the fade of gamma-aminobutyric acid-gated currents in frog dorsal root ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology 391, 219-234 | [Abstract] |
| ALGER, B. E. (1991). Gating of GABAergic inhibition in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 627, 249-263 | [Medline] |
| ANGELOTTI, T. P., UHLER, M. D. & MACDONALD, R. L. (1993). Assembly of GABAA receptor subunits: analysis of transient single-cell expression utilizing a fluorescent substrate/marker gene technique. Journal of Neuroscience 13, 1418-1428 | [Abstract] |
| BANKE, T. G., GREENWOOD, J. R., CHRISTENSEN, J. K., LILJEFORS, T., TRAYNELIS, S. F., SCHOUSBOE, A. & PICKERING, D. S. (2001). Identification of amino acid residues in GluR1 responsible for ligand binding and desensitization. Journal of Neuroscience 21, 3052-3062 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| BARTOS, M., VIDA, I., FROTSCHER, M., GEIGER, J. R. & JONAS, P. (2001). Rapid signaling at inhibitory synapses in a dentate gyrus interneuron network. Journal of Neuroscience 21, 2687-2698 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| BIANCHI, M. T., HAAS, K. F. & MACDONALD, R. L. (2001). Structural determinants of fast desensitization and desensitization-deactivation coupling in GABAA receptors. Journal of Neuroscience 21, 1127-1136 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| BIANCHI, M. T. & MACDONALD, R. L. (2001a). Agonist trapping by GABAA receptor channels. Journal of Neuroscience 21, 9083-9091 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| BIANCHI, M. T. & MACDONALD, R. L. (2001b). Mutation of the 9' leucine in the GABAA receptor 2L subunit produces an apparent decrease in desensitization by stabilizing open states without altering desensitized states. Neuropharmacology 41, 737-744 |
[Medline] |
| BRICKLEY, S. G., CULL-CANDY, S. G. & FARRANT, M. (1999). Single-channel properties of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors suggest differential targeting of receptor subtypes. Journal of Neuroscience 19, 2960-2973 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| CELENTANO, J. J. & WONG, R. K. S. (1994). Multiphasic desensitization of the GABAA receptor in outside-out patches. Biophysical Journal 66, 1039-1050 | [Abstract] |
| CHEN, L., WANG, H., VICINI, S. & OLSEN, R. W. (2000). The gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor-associated protein (GABARAP). promotes GABAA receptor clustering and modulates the channel kinetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97, 11557-11562 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| DALZIEL, J. E., COX, G. B., GAGE, P. W. & BIRNIR, B. (2000). Mutating the highly conserved second membrane-spanning region 9' leucine residue in the 1 or 1 subunit produces subunit-specific changes in the function of human 11 -aminobutyric acidA receptors. Molecular Pharmacology 57, 875-882 |
[Abstract/Full Text] |
| DAVIES, C. H. & COLLINGRIDGE, G. L. (1993). The physiological regulation of synaptic inhibition by GABAB autoreceptors in rat hippocampus. Journal of Physiology 472, 245-265 | [Abstract] |
| DAVIES, C. H., DAVIES, S. N. & COLLINGRIDGE, G. L. (1990). Paired-pulse depression of monosynaptic GABA-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic responses in rat hippocampus. Journal of Physiology 424, 513-531 | [Abstract] |
| DOMINGUEZ-PERROT, C., FELTZ, P. & POULTER, M. O. (1997). Recombinant GABAA receptor desensitization: the role of the 2 subunit and its physiological significance. Journal of Physiology 497, 145-159 |
[Abstract] |
| FISHER, J. L. & MACDONALD, R. L. (1997). Single channel properties of GABAA receptors containing 2 or subtypes expressed with 1 and 3 subtypes in L929 cells. Journal of Physiology 505, 283-297 |
[Abstract] |
| GALARRETA, M. & HESTRIN, S. (1998). Frequency-dependent synaptic depression and the balance of excitation and inhibition in the neocortex. Nature Neuroscience 1, 587-594 | [Medline] |
| GREENFIELD, L. J. JR & MACDONALD, R. L. (1996). Whole-cell and single-channel alpha1 beta1 gamma2S GABAA receptor currents elicited by a 'multipuffer' drug application device. Pflügers Archiv 432, 1080-1090 | [Medline] |
| GREENFIELD, L. J. JR, SUN, F., NEELANDS, T. R., BURGARD, E. C., DONNELLY, J. L. & MACDONALD, R. L. (1997). Expression of functional GABAA receptors in transfected L929 cells isolated by immunomagnetic bead separation. Neuropharmacology 36, 63-73 | [Medline] |
| HAAS, K. F. & MACDONALD, R. L. (1999). GABAA receptor subunit 2 and subtypes confer unique kinetic properties on recombinant GABAA receptor currents in mouse fibroblasts. Journal of Physiology 514, 27-45 |
[Abstract/Full Text] |
| IM, W. B., BINDER, J. A., DILLON, G. H., PREGENZER, J. F., IM, H. K. & ALTMAN, R. A. (1995). Acceleration of GABA-dependent desensitization by mutating threonine 266 to alanine of the alpha 6 subunit of rat GABAA receptors. Neuroscience Letters 186, 203-207 | [Medline] |
| ISAACSON, J. S., SOLIS, J. M. & NICOLL, R. A. (1993). Local and diffuse synaptic actions of GABA in the hippocampus. Neuron 10, 165-175 | [Medline] |
| JIANG, L., SUN, S., NEDERGAARD, M. & KANG, J. (2000), Paired-pulse modulation at individual GABAergic synapses in rat hippocampus). Journal of Physiology 523. 425-439 | |
| JONES, M. V. & WESTBROOK, G. L. (1995). Desensitized states prolong GABAA channel responses to brief agonist pulses. Neuron 15, 181-191 | [Medline] |
| JONES, M. V. & WESTBROOK, G. L. (1996). The impact of receptor desensitization on fast synaptic transmission. Trends in Neurosciences 19, 96-101 | [Medline] |
| JONES, M. V. & WESTBROOK, G. L. (1997). Shaping of IPSCs by endogenous calcineurin activity. Journal of Neuroscience 17, 7626-7633 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| LABARCA, C., NOWAK, M. W., ZHANG, H., TANG, L., DESHPANDE, P. & LESTER H. A. (1995). Channel gating governed symmetrically by conserved leucine residues in the M2 domain of nicotinic receptors. Nature 376, 514-516 | [Medline] |
| LERMA, J., HERRANZ, A. S., HERRERAS, O., ABRAIRA, V. & MARTIN, D. R. (1986). In vivo determination of extracellular concentration of amino acids in the rat hippocampus. A method based on brain dialysis and computerized analysis. Brain Research 384, 145-155 | [Medline] |
| LYNCH, J. W., RAJENDRA, S., PIERCE, K. D., HANDFORD, C. A., BARRY, P. H. & SCHOFIELD, P. R. (1997). Identification of intracellular and extracellular domains mediating signal transduction in the inhibitory glycine receptor chloride channel. EMBO Journal 16, 110-120 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| MCCARREN, M. & ALGER, B. E. (1985). Use-dependent depression of IPSPs in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells in vitro. Journal of Neurophysiology 53, 557-571 | [Medline] |
| MCKERNAN, R. M. & WHITING, P. J. (1996). Which GABAA-receptor subtypes really occur in the brain? Trends in Neurosciences 19, 139-143 | [Medline] |
| NARANJO, D. & BREHM, P. (1993). Modal shifts in acetylcholine receptor channel gating confer subunit-dependent desensitization. Science 260, 1811-1814 | |
| NUSSER, Z., SIEGHART, W. & SOMOGYI, P. (1998). Segregation of different GABAA receptors to synaptic and extrasynaptic membranes of cerebellar granule cells. Journal of Neuroscience 18, 1693-1703 | [Abstract/Full Text] |
| OLSEN, R. W. & MACDONALD, R. L. (2002). GABAA receptor complex: structure and function. In Glutamate and GABA Receptors and Transporters: Structure, Function, and Pharmacology, ed. EGEBJERG, J., SCHOUSBOE, A. & KROGSGAARD-LARSEN, P., chap. 9, pp. 203-235. Taylor and Francis, New York | |
| OVERSTREET, L. S., JONES, M. V. & WESTBROOK, G. L. (2000). Slow desensitization regulates the availability of synaptic GABA(A) receptors. Journal of Neuroscience 20, 7914-7921 |
), 5 s (
) and 10 s (
) for the plot in B. B, current-voltage relation plots were derived from current measurements at three different time points of each GABA application from the cell shown in A. Similar plots were obtained in three other cells. C, calculated chloride reversal potentials were measured as the voltage corresponding to zero current from fitting the I-V relations with a straight line from -50 to +30 for each cell. Values were not significantly different among the three measurement time points (filled bars). ECl was also calculated from 3-4 GABA applications from -20 to +10 mV in cells where 85-90 % series resistance compensation was used (open bars). D, the cumulative charge transfer is shown for five randomly chosen